Search found 9 matches
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:46 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Center
- Topic: Fine Art and the photo policy
- Replies: 88
- Views: 12413
Did I accidentally crash some little club? I'm sorry, but I didn't whine, I merely asked some very legitimate questions about a very very very odd contract that I was expected to follow. And where is this assumption that I am seeking anything from anyone? Very touchy aren't you. As I have said, I do...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:03 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Center
- Topic: Fine Art and the photo policy
- Replies: 88
- Views: 12413
Hold on... Before I ever said Weekend Warhol I was told, in no uncertain terms to "fuck off." I was also to that BM wasn't a good platform for contemporary fine art. I explained my side and said that while it is mostly Weekend Warhols (and I said it was a blunt term), I was going to do my thing, etc...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:43 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Center
- Topic: Fine Art and the photo policy
- Replies: 88
- Views: 12413
[quote="mudpuppy000"]If all this lack of control bothers you so much, maybe burning man isn't your thing. Arguing about it is just tilting at windmills. edit: yeah what minxy said. :)[/quote] Actually my concern is with the utter amount of control a third party would have over my work. And yes, appa...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:51 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Center
- Topic: Fine Art and the photo policy
- Replies: 88
- Views: 12413
Actually the way the contract is written, I would have to get my gear registered anyway! Also, to be honest, if I am going to spend the cash to haul my installation 3,000 miles I am going to take pictures of it. Which apparently under this contract means I couldn't show them to anyone for any gain. ...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:20 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Center
- Topic: Fine Art and the photo policy
- Replies: 88
- Views: 12413
Technically it is the governments. They just borrow it. And again, if you don't want art made there, why advertise it as such? And honestly, I am a bit wary of any entity claiming legal authority that uses such terms as "Mistress" to describe someone with unstated qualifications. Is she a lawyer? If...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:06 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Center
- Topic: Fine Art and the photo policy
- Replies: 88
- Views: 12413
Actually I feel that the rules put in place are very open to exploitation. Not that this has actually happened yet. One can pick nits about all of this, and what is exploitation and how much bokeh one needs before you aren't exploiting that camp 300 feet behind you, etc. But that is what it is, nit ...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:50 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Center
- Topic: Fine Art and the photo policy
- Replies: 88
- Views: 12413
[quote]Wow, haven't had an indignant photographer in here for a while. Welcome to Burning Man! Now go the fuck home![/quote] Nice attitude. So let me get this straight... Someone who is a working artist comes here and nicely says, "Hey this is antithetical to me making work," when Burningman claims ...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:37 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Center
- Topic: Fine Art and the photo policy
- Replies: 88
- Views: 12413
I am well versed in the model release. You seem to have missed the point. My issue is not with respecting people's rights to be photographed or not. I have no issue with that policy and thus never mentioned it. My issue is that it seems under that contract that if I was to go there and take any imag...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 3:25 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Center
- Topic: Fine Art and the photo policy
- Replies: 88
- Views: 12413
Fine Art and the photo policy
Hello - I looked, but couldn't quite find what I was looking for regarding my particular concern here, but please, pardon me if this has been covered and I missed it. I am a working artist and my focus is on installation and photography. Art is my full time job, and I also teach art at the universit...