Girlie girls.

BlueBirdPoof · Post by **BlueBirdPoof** » Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:19 pm

Wind_Borne wrote:
Axiom 1: Femininity and masculinity have instinctual and social components.
Axiom 2: Femininity and masculinity are based on comparative biology of each sex.
Axiom 3: Modern technology nullifies some of the above sexual traits (like physical strength).
Axiom 4: Our instincts don't evolve as fast as our technology.

Theorom: Femininity and masculinity are constantly redefined in the context of current technology and social conditions.

Not bad, but one thing I don't see here is a place for all the gender blending possiblities. Plus, my guess--from reading and life experience--is that every culture spends a lot of time defining Masculine and Feminine in order to exagerate the biological differences. And that the sexes are not as different as we imagine. And I have yet to find a fool proof method of sexing or gendering. (Well, with humans and gendering you can ask and risk being blown off somehow.)

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:20 pm

hey I have a question. How come this metrosexual thing does not apply to girls?

BlueBirdPoof · Post by **BlueBirdPoof** » Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:29 pm

I have no answer for you. But I'm going to feel so embarrassed if being a soft butch who tends to sleep with men ever gets to be trendy flavor of the month faddish. I'll have to invent a new non-comformaty.

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:32 pm

BlueBirdPoof wrote:I have no answer for you. But I'm going to feel so embarrassed if being a soft butch who tends to sleep with men ever gets to be trendy flavor of the month faddish. I'll have to invent a new non-comformaty.

Hey that'll never happen. well at least i hope not..
"a soft butch who tends to sleep with men "? woo hoo.

Flux · Post by **Flux** » Wed Nov 05, 2003 5:39 pm

BlueBirdPoof wrote:...a soft butch who tends to sleep with men...

<swoon>

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:30 am

Bump!