Girlie girls.

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 10:37 am

my Ivy you seem a little uptight. i've answered everyones question since i put up this thread.

why are you so up tight with everybody?

do you want to go to a party or something. it's supposed to be a fun thing nothing special.

Ivy · Post by **Ivy** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:30 am

You have answered none of my questions, the first and foremost being, "what is a girlie girl?"

I believe it was said well in another topic: "a thread is not started by title alone."

I'm trying to make an effort as to what this thread is all about, becuase I thought it might hold interest to me, but now I see it's just another forum for your nonsensical, cryptic sentences.

I'm not uptight with everyone, just people that I find annoying that tax my time and patience.

And I don't do anything that isn't special: if it's not special in some way, then what's the point?

girlie · Post by **girlie** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:41 am

Ivy wrote:
>> "what is a girlie girl?"

I second the question. My name is girlie girl, so i must say that i find
reading this thread quite confusing and amusing. What is the girlie girl
stereotype you are talking about?

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:53 am

Kinetic wrote:What about girlie girls? Give us some details on what your thinking...for all I know you could be talking about Olivia's website:

http://www.suicidegirls.com

DIGIMAN wrote:yeah yeah yeah i've seen it. yeah that'll work. but it would be better to get the girlie girls to start out what they want of it.

as was stated at the begining of this thread (seems only a few read )

i am a learner. i have no problems with that.

so to clarify. i really dont care if i'm offending anyone because that was not what i wanted to do. if you read any of my post i have no intention nor have i nor have i intentionally wanted to offend anyone.

now that that is out of the way and i am not at home at my computer so i cant quote as easily, i'll say this much.

the girlie girl thread was intended to make suttle conversation. it would be nice if you were to put what direction you like on it or ignore it all together. makes no difference to me. i'm not into offending anybody and i know i made that clear before especially to Ivy. if you dont want to read it then dont. there are other threads. nothing personal.

DogBoy · Post by **DogBoy** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 12:31 pm

Digiman sez-

as was stated at the begining of this thread (seems only a few read )

I read it...The OP doesn't say much of anything.

& then...

the girlie girl thread was intended to make suttle conversation. it would be nice if you were to put what direction you like on it or ignore it all together

Well, as you are the one that put the thread up, having a direction for it to go is kinda your responsability. You seem to have started several threads with no direction at all. Try starting a thread with a post explaining what your intent with it is. You need not just a title/subject, but some idea of what discussion you want from people. If you just want conversation, may I recomend the Idle Chat Thread.

Ivy · Post by **Ivy** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 12:34 pm

DIGIMAN wrote:
yeah yeah yeah i've seen it. yeah that'll work. but it would be better to get the girlie girls to start out what they want of it.

I so do not understand how this explains what a "girlie girl" is.

Can you please translate it into English for those of us that don't speak digiman?

warrior queen · Post by **warrior queen** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 1:17 pm

I think it means that he wants us to define it ourselves.

Ivy · Post by **Ivy** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 1:29 pm

That's cool, but it really wasn't clear.

III · Post by **III** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 2:42 pm

>i am a learner.

you left out "slow".

girlie · Post by **girlie** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 2:44 pm

>>I think it means that he wants us to define it ourselves.

I've been redefining the term "girlie girl" for over 5 years now.
(http://eplaya.burningman.org/viewtopic. ... 35&start=9)
It's a fun name to play with.

I find the act of stereotyping people through terminology to be pretty
facinating stuff. Marketing people have made it an art, and pretty much
everyone seems to have a handful of phrases they use to label people
they know or have met along the way. These terms represent gross
generalizations though, and they don't tend to be very accurate on an
individual basis. I find that as i get older i use these terms (like
"hippy", "yuppy", "raver", etc.) less and less, as they never seem to
mean anything real.

Anyone else have similar experiences with this type of language? Do you
find you use stereotypes more or less then you use to?

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 2:55 pm

girlie wrote:>>I think it means that he wants us to define it ourselves.

I've been redefining the term "girlie girl" for over 5 years now.
(http://eplaya.burningman.org/viewtopic. ... 35&start=9)
It's a fun name to play with.

I find the act of stereotyping people through terminology to be pretty
facinating stuff. Marketing people have made it an art, and pretty much
everyone seems to have a handful of phrases they use to label people
they know or have met along the way. These terms represent gross
generalizations though, and they don't tend to be very accurate on an
individual basis. I find that as i get older i use these terms (like
"hippy", "yuppy", "raver", etc.) less and less, as they never seem to
mean anything real.

Anyone else have similar experiences with this type of language? Do you
find you use stereotypes more or less then you use to?

excellent from the girlie herself. pleased to meet you. i've never seen you before. not you pic am i talking about.

and ok i'll say i'm a little slow III. this is starting to be fun.

Ivy · Post by **Ivy** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:42 pm

So, Digiman, how would you define a girlie girl?

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:44 pm

well

after looking back at all of your postings on this thread today i'd say your a girlie girl.

hey i hope that was'nt insulting but i think girlie hit it on the head for me

Rob the Wop · Post by **Rob the Wop** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:50 pm

Ivy wrote:So, Digiman, how would you define a girlie girl?

Girlie girl?

I ain't gonna tell her.

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:55 pm

Rob the Wop wrote:
Ivy wrote:So, Digiman, how would you define a girlie girl?

Girlie girl?

I ain't gonna tell her.

aw man that's half a girlie guy. that dont count.

girlie · Post by **girlie** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:55 pm

>> Girlie girl?

Damn, that picture doesn't quite show my good side, does it. :-)

The lighting's a little better in this one.

Rob the Wop · Post by **Rob the Wop** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:57 pm

girlie wrote:>> Girlie girl?

Damn, that picture doesn't quite show my good side, does it.

The lighting's a little better in this one.

<i>Again, I ain't telling her. I don't relish being a backfur pate'.</i>

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:58 pm

girlie wrote:>> Girlie girl?

Damn, that picture doesn't quite show my good side, does it.

The lighting's a little better in this one.

now that's my kind of the ultimate girlie girl yeah yeah yeah
Ivy seems to fit that too.

Ivy · Post by **Ivy** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 4:37 pm

after looking back at all of your postings on this thread today i'd say your a girlie girl.

I'd like to see cited examples with explanation, please.

And, I'm sorry, agreeing with girlie just deosn't cut it. I respect her opinion, but to just say "i agree with her" is a cop out. Maybe you don't really know what a girlie girl is; that's okay, just say so and ask what other people think. It's easy. Coherent sentences, surprising at it may sound, are often good things.

girlie · Post by **girlie** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 4:43 pm

>> And, I'm sorry, agreeing with girlie just deosn't cut it. I respect her opinion, but to just say "i agree with her" is a cop out.

Plus, i'm not really sure that i gave a real opinion on anything -- i just
made some comments on stereotyping. Digiman, if you wanna use labels
for people i agree with Ivy that you may wanna define what those labels
mean to you. Then it might be easier to get into a conversation with
others about what those labels mean to them, if that is indeed what you
are trying to do here.

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 4:44 pm

Ivy wrote:
after looking back at all of your postings on this thread today i'd say your a girlie girl.
I'd like to see cited examples with explanation, please.

And, I'm sorry, agreeing with girlie just deosn't cut it. I respect her opinion, but to just say "i agree with her" is a cop out. Maybe you don't really know what a girlie girl is; that's okay, just say so and ask what other people think. It's easy. Coherent sentences, surprising at it may sound, are often good things.

you did'nt see girlie's smashing pumpkins pic?

that's been you all day all the way.

and i dont think it's all that bad. you just really suddeny got my attention. i have no idea why.

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 4:46 pm

personally speaking i know for a fact Ivy is making too way too big a deal about it and maybe she has some other splinter under her nail to put it nicely

Lydia Love · Post by **Lydia Love** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 4:49 pm

I dunno Digiman - this vagueness and passivity from someone creating all these threads is bugging the fuck out of me too... Ivy is just more forthright about it.

girlie · Post by **girlie** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 4:55 pm

>>personally speaking i know for a fact Ivy is making too way too big a deal about it

Doesn't appear that way from where i'm sitting. I think she is simply
trying to communicate with you. You, on the other hand, appear to have
more interest in trading one liners then actually talking with people about
your thread topic. It is unclear whether this is purposeful, or out of
ignorance.

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:02 pm

ok i'll admit it's out of ignorance. then again it's kinda hard for me to concentrate like i'm supposed to cause i'm finishing up some work right now.

i really should be doing this on my off time. sorry.

hey just as long as Ivy is not mad at me or anybody else for that matter.

III · Post by **III** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:16 pm

it should be pretty fuckin clear by now that digiman is some halfassed undergraduate a.i. project that's barely gonna get its creator a passing grade.

kinda like eliza with a brain tumor.

DNFTT

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:22 pm

amazing all this over 2 words.

pretty good.

i guess you graduates think of me as a troll or something.

sounds to me like mabey it's a west coast thing. it was getting good there for awhile but looks like we all are not compatable.

i should have know when i saw the steam from too many....

from just 2 words.

no cheap shot just true. 2 words...hhuuuuhhhuhuh

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:26 pm

Ivy wrote:
after looking back at all of your postings on this thread today i'd say your a girlie girl.
I'd like to see cited examples with explanation, please.

And, I'm sorry, agreeing with girlie just deosn't cut it. I respect her opinion, but to just say "i agree with her" is a cop out. Maybe you don't really know what a girlie girl is; that's okay, just say so and ask what other people think. It's easy. Coherent sentences, surprising at it may sound, are often good things.

Ivy wrote:
hey is Ivy the only girl in this girlie girl scene?
Okay, NOW I'm offended.

I am neither "girlie girl" (if I even knew what that really was, since I still have no fucking clue what the hell you're talking about in this thread) nor do i belong to any scene, as I thought I mentioned earlier.

i know there are alot of guys here with her.
Guys "here with me?" I don't understand what this is supposed to mean. People resonding to my posts? People I'm involved with?

i need to start charging for you guys responding to Ivy
Kiss my ass. If anyone's making money off me, it damn well better be me.

is that question answered? hey i dont know. i'm still mellow.

III · Post by **III** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:26 pm

nah, it's your persistance in the "here's some garbage, what do you think?" and "that sounds good to me. how do *you* feel about that" discussion style that belies an inability at normal human interaction.

THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN · Post by **THE ORIGINAL DIGIMAN** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:28 pm

III wrote:nah, it's your persistance in the "here's some garbage, what do you think?" and "that sounds good to me. how do *you* feel about that" discussion style that belies an inability at normal human interaction.

how is girlie girl garbage ?