Oh, you mean...like....work?Bob wrote:Au contraire mon frere, *all* of the items that Harbor Freight sells do exactly what they are supposed to do.
(and seriously, those water pumps have nowhere near the flowrate they claim)
Oh, you mean...like....work?Bob wrote:Au contraire mon frere, *all* of the items that Harbor Freight sells do exactly what they are supposed to do.
MyDearFriend wrote:Men need to know: Ejaculating 2-5 times per week will significantly reduce your risk of prostate cancer.
Women need to know: Men can handle that independently.
September is Prostate Health Awareness Month.Get busy.
MyDearFriend wrote:Men need to know: Ejaculating 2-5 times per week will significantly reduce your risk of prostate cancer.
Women need to know: Men can handle that independently.
September is Prostate Health Awareness Month.Get busy.
oneeyeddick wrote:MyDearFriend wrote:Men need to know: Ejaculating 2-5 times per week will significantly reduce your risk of prostate cancer.
Women need to know: Men can handle that independently.
September is Prostate Health Awareness Month.Get busy.
While ejaculating "MIGHT" decrease your odds by up to 30%, drinking a half dozen cups of coffee a day decreases your odds(60%!) twice as much as jacking off or whatever gets you there.
and no, Ygmir, if you do both it does not mean 90%.
Box Burner wrote:Don't they use those on low-riders?
And it comes in assorted flavors, there's your Charlie Daniels, your Dennis Hopper and my favorite Hobo.Bob wrote:Soylent Green is hippies.
Prior to the Federal Income tax (and prohibition), almost 40% of the governments revenue came from taxes on liquor & beer. One major reason the Income Tax went through was to replace the revenue from alcohol & help pave the way for Prohibition.cowboyangel wrote: 8. The federal income tax was instituted specifically to coerce taxpayers to pay the interest due to the banks on the federal debt. If the money supply had been created by the government rather than borrowed from banks that created it, the income tax would have been unnecessary.
Trishntek wrote: When correctly wired, I can shoot sparks out my cock via my third ball.
and contrary to popular beleif quite stupid!Bob wrote:Owls are assholes.
Or at least pseudo-intellects like Owl from Winnie the Pooh.graidawg wrote:and contrary to popular beleif quite stupid!Bob wrote:Owls are assholes.
i remember reading winnie the pooh to my girlfriends son and being quite shocked that owl was so dumb and that rabbit was the clever one. i guess knowmad has hidden depthsBBadger wrote:Or at least pseudo-intellects like Owl from Winnie the Pooh.graidawg wrote:and contrary to popular beleif quite stupid!Bob wrote:Owls are assholes.

This is so true, I tested this theory in my late 30s, after many 18 hour days (which included work & play), I once went a week with 3 hour sleep periods each 24 hours, after which I passed out with my head landing in a Indian curry, slightly burning half my face. After this event I discovered that after a decent period of sleep and getting up early in the morning I could complete the work in half the time without making mistakes.marck wrote:You cannot "store up" sleep before you decide to stay up for four days.(91 hours was my "record")
You can only try to recover afterwords, which may take two or more days.
My rule of thumb is: for every day you are awake you will need another day recover.
You become less effective at getting anything done after you have been awake for over 36 hours, two to three hour naps may extend your effectiveness.
The point being limiting yourself to 18 hour days will maximize your productivity, all-nighters are not as productive for long projects.
I know there's a joke in there somewhere..........gaminwench wrote:If you hold a piece of bread in your mouth while cutting onions, your eyes won't tear up...
If you hold an onion in your mouth while cutting cheese, nobody will notice,,,ygmir wrote:I know there's a joke in there somewhere..........gaminwench wrote:If you hold a piece of bread in your mouth while cutting onions, your eyes won't tear up...
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
Years ago someone looked at Sears car batteries.Bay Bridge Sue wrote:
Originally, Craftsman tools were produced by major companies building the best of the best under contract to put the famous brand on it. Their motto was, If it ever breaks, we'll replace it", knowing that the specs were so high that it was extremely unlikely it would ever break. (I have a snap on ratchet head that's carrying the Craftsman Brand that was my daddy's...)
Then someone realized.. if you charge the same amount, but instead use the absolute shit cheapest tools possible, when the tool breaks, it only costs 2.3 cents to replace that $21.99 tool... and you just got people into your store again to buy something else at an equally ridiculous mark up.
Then they realized, if the tools are the absolute shit cheapest, people will stop buying your shit tools, so we better have ALMOST the cheapest shit tools, so they won''t break ALL the time, but they're not built like, say, MAC or MATCO or Snap-on... so they may cost 15 cents, rather than 2.3 cents, but they're saving brand loyalty (a little) and making more, because they may only have to replace that tool once, rather than 15 times (which ends up costing them less)...