spectabillis wrote:Dustbuddy wrote:... Give me a fucking break.... Are you totally motherfucking serious? That has got to be the most feeble goddamned excuse ... we've established that you are one sorry excuse for a man... your non-existent conscience ...
Conscience? Who's the person throwing insults, negative remarks, and innuendo's?
Those would be "innuendos"; "innuendo's" would imply the use of the possessive, "innuendos" is plural.
Either way, hardly, and look who's talking. When I say something, I say it directly, such as now, when I say that you are unfit to be a moderator on this or any other board. Every insult I threw was provoked, every negative remark backed up with verified fact. The only moral standard under which these could be viewed to be objectionable is that which you bring to everything you do: that of abject cowardice.
Seriously, just knock it off with that already, please.
Knock what off? Telling the truth when you can't cope?
No, I still have not read each and every word of each and every comment in this topic.
You saw the post that you just responded to, didn't you? You've read enough, and what you didn't read, you freely chose to ignore. Don't make excuses for yourself. You own your own choices, and they were contemptible ones without exception.
And no, I did not say I needed or did not need Spanky's help for ipaddr lookups.
When did I say you did? Or do you now wish to confuse me with Kinetic, the same way Rockdad wanted to confuse me with HughMungus?
And no again, I have never seen any explicit request to look up an ipaddr until these last few posts.
Right.
And I ask, again, if it was so serious why did you not PM me, another moderator, and admin, or email someone?
And I tell you, again, that is one weak excuse and an insult to almost everybody's intelligence. You respond to posts, but we're supposed to believe that you are incapable of seeing what you just responded to, because it wasn't a PM? What would explain this strange neurological condition of yours?
And once again, you are more than welcome to contact any and all staff members concerning any of this. I dont think their reaction is going to be much different from everyone else's you see here
On this, I'm inclined to agree with you. What is pathetic is that you see this as a source of moral validation, when all it really is, is a sign of Groupthink run out of control..
- unfortunately I dont think anyone else even wants to answer you.
Moot point, now, don't you think? I was accused of something, and the accusation was proved to be without merit, no thanks to you. If my primary ISP is left in peace, then I will have all that I could have asked for in a resolution in this matter, except for the comfort of knowing that I had not had to put the good people at Netsource at risk for an unpleasant experience, and the happy thought that the improvement in ePlaya's culture had been more than an act. The reality now stands exposed for all to see.
But you can always try, please do.
How ironic, I was the only person who was willing to try and look how you get treated.
Try to do what? As I was being defamed, in what way did you try to help me before I helped myself?
What a great community, thanks Dustbuddy!
Thank yourself. You guys have been trying to build community without morality, and that doesn't work. Yes, morality, and that doesn't mean a warm, fuzzy feelinbg that gets applied to anybody and everybody, regardless of how they act. That is a vision of right and wrong you should have outgrown before your third birthday party. Morality includes responsibility, and that concept means nothing if nobody ever gets held responsible for anything. Sometime that means that we do unpleasant things to others for no better reason than the fact that they deserve it.
And I will repeat this, yet again - its best for people to take personal differences to private messages.
A private rebuttal to a public defamation?
Its bad enough that everyone else on the board has to put up with this shit
Small reminder, Spec, because you seem to want people to forget this: I was in the right. It isn't debatable. I said that I was wrongly accused of being Hugh's sock puppet and I proved it. Right now, you're at war with the truth.
in the topics they try to have some sort of discussion in, but its much worse to spread it around by going and creating a whole new topic for it..
Even by the warped standards of so-called "Netiquette", you're wrong. Creating a new thread when a new topic arises has been SOP on the Internet since the days when the Internet was little more than Usenet and a few gopher sites. Sock puppet accusations and the 9-11 Conspiracy theory are clearly two entirely different topics, so in fact, splitting this topic off was established procedure. Note that I even put the new thread in the correct forum.
But you're always free to surprise me.
Ok, as far as I can tell you are not HughM.
How gracious of you to finally admit it. Does the expression "it was like pulling teeth" mean anything to you?
The only socks I see under your account are ... Traveller, Observer, and Dustbuddy.
*Groan* More sock puppet accusations, from the very person who refused my earlier demand to confirm that I was posting from a Midwestern ISP on the basis that he wanted to protect my privacy, back when I was debunking the first one.
Screw it, I am not going through this again. I'll get put through Hell getting past the new smear, and you guys will just come up with another one, and another one, until I get too tired to keep doing this. Why bother, especially when nothing positive is coming out of the experience? I'm out of here.
