Bet on Bush??

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:53 pm

It's pretty quiet in here so I thought I'd look for something interesting.
Diane o thirst made a wish for goblins to take Bush away.

We have a goblin candidate.

"As for Bush himself, one of his Harvard Business School professors said that Dubya was "famous" in his class for being a "pathological" liar. "

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne ... ricane.htm

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:14 pm

Here's a nice explanation of where the heat is coming from.
http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=46498

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:21 pm

Diane, you're goblins are sniffing blood and closing in.

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/p ... 7560.shtml

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Wed Oct 26, 2005 3:05 pm

I don't know if this is old news or not.
http://zzpat.bravehost.com/oct_2005/sup ... urges.html

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:34 am

This is from strange cosmos. It doesn't really say much for the people who run this country.

OUR CONGRESS

36 have been accused of spousal abuse

7 have been arrested for fraud

19 have been accused of writing bad checks

117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses

3 have done time for assault

71, repeat 71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit

14 have been arrested on drug-related charges

8 have been arrested for shoplifting

21 currently are defendants in law! suits. and

84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year

Think off it. 20% of our leaders have bankrupted businesses. What does that imply for us when they are responsible for printing money?

6% have recent DUI. This is either severe power trip or severe stupidity.
Argentina is looking better all the time.

diane o'thirst · Post by **diane o'thirst** » Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:42 pm

Bush was touch-and-go to begin with and I seriously think he's gone off the deep end. What else can explain his ignoring the rest of the country in favour of pandering to the Theocratic Right?

I give Bush a vote of No Confidence.

I said it before, and I say it again: Bush is not a leader, he's at best a manipulator. And he hasn't the first hint of the least scrap of wisdom. Cunning, perhaps — but not wisdom.

His alleged mood swings (I only say "alleged" because I'm not direct witness to them) are making the wolf in my heart prick up her ears and stare. Instability is a sign of weakness: we all know what wolves do when they spot that...

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:49 pm

Has anyone run accross anything like this. It may be BS, but certain people will do anything !!!
http://www.infowars.com/articles/terror ... terror.htm

Kinetic IV · Post by **Kinetic IV** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:59 pm

Could someone pass the salt please?

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:28 pm

eloquent

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:19 pm

UUUMMM!

It's gettin lively in here.

Isotopia · Post by **Isotopia** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:43 am

Bush is not a leader, he's at best a manipulator.

And not even a good one at that. His insistence that Iraq is the fulcrum of terrorism in the middle-east shows just how fucking blind to the facts/truth he is. Not to mention his susceptibility to the whisperings of his own version of the Palace Guards. He'll be the last to smell the political blood that Congrees is whiffing. Just like he's oblivious to the smell of the 1000+ women and men that lie in their grave because of his lies.

Lassen Forge · Post by **Lassen Forge** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 9:30 am

Isotopia wrote:
Bush is not a leader, he's at best a manipulator.
And not even a good one at that. His insistence that Iraq is the fulcrum of terrorism in the middle-east shows just how fucking blind to the facts/truth he is. Not to mention his susceptibility to the whisperings of his own version of the Palace Guards. He'll be the last to smell the political blood that Congrees is whiffing. Just like he's oblivious to the smell of the 1000+ women and men that lie in their grave because of his lies.

No... Iraq was the fulcrum of their leader insulting his daddy so we get even, and making sure we have a permanent supply of oil under our control, no matter how many of our kids get killed for it.

Oops... maybe no one is supposed to know that.

After all, we must honor the sacrifices of those kids already killed by sacrificing more lives to the American oil colony of Iraq plan. We must honor them by killing as many more as we can...

Oops... slipped out again...

Because the only important thing is to make sure we don't lose control of that vast cheap oil supply, no matter how many kids are killed and how badly we snow the American people by using catch phrases like 9-11 and War on Terror, because our profits and famly fortunes depend on...

Oops again... keeps slipping out...

And we better do everything to make sure we win the next election, no matter how the people really vote, because we need to keep power until our oil oligarchy is firmly in place...

Darn. Better shut up. Otherwise the truth might just be heard. Can't have that now, can we?

Bin Noddin · Post by **Bin Noddin** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:52 am

No... Iraq was the fulcrum of their leader insulting his daddy so we get even, and making sure we have a permanent supply of oil under our control, no matter how many of our kids get killed for it.

You nailed it, BBSue. Its scary to think how much of this is just that stupid boy's present to his dad who at least was smart enough to stay out of Bagdad. Stupidity can be worse than evil (read Barbara Tuchman's "March of Folly").

mojo · Post by **mojo** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:04 pm

BBS, - tell it sister! Has anyone even seen an accounting of the Iraqui oil resources and their export since the occupation?

joel the ornery · Post by **joel the ornery** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:03 pm

quite a vacuum of thought going on in here.

diane o'thirst · Post by **diane o'thirst** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:10 pm

I'm starting to wonder if it's really about oil, down to the brass tacks.

I know it's dogma to say "Blood for oil" but bear with me...

The recent spending and appropriations bill carries two items in it that should have most of us reaching for the torches and pitchforks. One: The Broken Promise. Congress withdrawing the money to NYC that was supposed to treat workers, survivors and emergency personnel that were exposed to the environmental hazards and toxins released by the fall of the Towers on 9/11. And second, the proposed budget cut to cancer research. I won't go into Cheney's midnight deal-making to stamp out the bill to abolish torture, which passed the Senate 90-9.

The Broken Promise and the spending cuts to cancer research leads me to believe that not just the kids in our Armed Forces, but the American people — folks back home — are being sacrificed to the Iraq war, and we know that's where the money's going to be siphoned into. If anything, cancer research needs MORE money, not less. And a promise is a promise.

The United States of America is being governed by a hostile foreign power.

joel the ornery · Post by **joel the ornery** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:18 pm

diane o'thirst wrote:The United States of America is being governed by a hostile foreign power.

tsk... tsk... tsk

helitack · Post by **helitack** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:37 pm

No, I believe we are being governed by corporate puppets.

joel the ornery · Post by **joel the ornery** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:46 pm

No, I believe we, the people have allowed ourselves to be governed by corporate puppets.

helitack · Post by **helitack** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:02 pm

joel the ornery wrote:No, I believe we, the people have allowed ourselves to be governed by corporate puppets.

That is exactly what I meant to say. Thanks Joel.

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:40 pm

I'm listening to stevie wonder's "you haven't done nothin"

Woops, wrong thread. ............or is it?

I thought this was the "what cha listening to" thread

Lassen Forge · Post by **Lassen Forge** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:09 pm

helitack wrote:
joel the ornery wrote:No, I believe we, the people have allowed ourselves to be governed by corporate puppets.
That is exactly what I meant to say. Thanks Joel.

Very well said, gentelmen!!

bb

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:33 pm

I'm listening to The psycadelic furs "President gas".

darn! Wrong thread again huh?

diane o'thirst · Post by **diane o'thirst** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:32 pm

Wow, look, I made a pointed statement! The effrontery! The temerity! Shall I apologize now?

Tell you what — I'll vote for Bush in the next election. Oh wait, he's not going to be in there. TSOL, I guess.

Lassen Forge · Post by **Lassen Forge** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:05 pm

Whaddya mean he's not gonna be there? He didn't win the last 2 elections and he's there... what makes you think this one'll be any different??

bb

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:41 pm

Bush will win the third......woops, are they working on that yet? Or will it be Jeb in 08?

joel the ornery · Post by **joel the ornery** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:15 am

well, if a Republicans win in '06 and '08... the loyal opposition has NO ONE TO BLAME BUT THEMSELVES.

I mean, have you listened to a John Kerry statement... the man personifies an over the counter sleep aid.

John Edwards... the Robin of the Democratic Batman/Robin team.

Joe Biden... a master of the sleazy appearance

and... Ted Kennedy... he's elevated himself to "joke punchline."

Three Jews walk into a bar.... ugh.... Ted Kennedy! (laughter ensues)

and then there is "do as i say, not at i do Hillary." enough said there.

me personally, i look forward to a McCain/Guiliani ticket in '08. (hawkish moderation)

but, hey that is just my opinion.

Lassen Forge · Post by **Lassen Forge** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 8:57 am

I've always believed that one votes for the most qualified candidate, not the political party. (Oops - had to edit that, sorry!!)

McCain? Yeah, he could do the job. So could Nader. So could Dean. Notice they're all different philosophies - but any of them would be better than what we had a choice of...

I just wonder, with all the damage BushCo has done to the Republican Party if even someone like McCain could fix it.

________

New bumper sticker - Bush is proof ANYONE can be President.

joel the ornery · Post by **joel the ornery** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:01 am

Bay Bridge Sue wrote:I've always believed that one votes for the most qualified candidate, not the political party.

i wish the most qualified, were the actual candidates. <heavy sigh>

Sierra · Post by **Sierra** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:13 am

A principle of government is to pretend to be the opponent. They can control the questions asked that way. This site is almost certainly the government. You should go on to it annonymously on a public computer.
www.inplanesite.com. If you get the video you should get it under a name other than your own and sent general delivery. Even then, if they want to know who you are they will. Horrible to say , if you you look into this sort of thing your phone and your computer will be tapped.