How would you violate Sarah Palin?

Post by **Elderberry** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:55 am

OMG I think I'm blind!

JK

Apollonaris Zeus · Post by **Apollonaris Zeus** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 12:11 pm

Why can't we all just fuck together!

somekind · Post by **somekind** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 12:12 pm

Why don't the chicks ever take their shoes off?

Post by **Elderberry** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 12:52 pm

somekind wrote:Why don't the chicks ever take their shoes off?

Because they are sexy!

JK

somekind · Post by **somekind** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 12:59 pm

I suppose, but no chick I've ever fucked wore her shoes during sex, and obviously none had shoes like that. (Maybe that's something you do at BM. I wouldn't know).

Post by **AntiM** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:07 pm

somekind wrote: This is my best attempt. I had trouble with photobucket over obscenity, so I added the censored bars. You still get the picture, right?

Where can I post something like this without getting banned?

Well, if I get complaints, it won't be posted here. Yes, there's censorship on the eplaya .... we're supposed to be somewhat work safe. Pretty sure you're violating the TOS and the community guidelines. If any pic even remotely looks like kids are involved, it will come down. No one's been banned for naughty pictures, but they have been toned down or taken down. Just so you know how it goes here.

Yes, I think it is funny. Just letting you know the eplaya is not as wide open as folks seem to think.

gyre · Post by **gyre** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:20 pm

Well, I'll make a complaint.
I don't like the censorship bars, just on principle.

I hear a film is in production called Nailing Palin.
No word on whether it is really her, but fundraising does seem to be a priority.

Apollonaris Zeus · Post by **Apollonaris Zeus** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:22 pm

AntiM wrote: Just letting you know the eplaya is not as wide open as folks seem to think.

Nor is it as wide open as Palin holes in that picture.

I'm glad the poster has used self-censorship

cowboyangel · Post by **cowboyangel** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:58 pm

Palin violates herself with her constant drone of vile stupidity. No need for outside help.

theCryptofishist · Post by **theCryptofishist** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:14 pm

somekind wrote:Why don't the chicks ever take their shoes off?

Will you look at those damn shoes? That's five minutes of unbuckling, and trying to get them back on in a post-coital haze...

Luckily, I don't have that problem.

Dr. Pyro · Post by **Dr. Pyro** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 8:02 pm

People people people, the question is simple: How would you violate Sarah Palin? Personally, I'd like to fuck her in the mouth. Now please, let's stay on topic.

Ginger · Post by **Ginger** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 8:08 pm

I have to say that I think this is kind of fucked up. Anyone that wants to accuse me of being uptight and not able to take a joke can. I don't care. It's sick that you would use the word violate. It seems to indicate that it's ok to rape a woman if she's a big enough asshole. While I hate Sarah Palin too, I certainly don't think that rape is an acceptable punishment.

So, let it fly. I'm ready.

dr.placebo · Post by **dr.placebo** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 8:30 pm

I am no fan of Sarah Palin, and I agree that suggesting that she be violated is in poor taste. It sounds entirely too Republican for me.

I'd be happy to have her go back to Alaska intact. I'd be even happier if the investigation of her gets her removed from office, but that's a long shot.

Post by **Elderberry** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 8:58 pm

Ginger wrote:I have to say that I think this is kind of fucked up. Anyone that wants to accuse me of being uptight and not able to take a joke can. I don't care. It's sick that you would use the word violate. It seems to indicate that it's ok to rape a woman if she's a big enough asshole. While I hate Sarah Palin too, I certainly don't think that rape is an acceptable punishment.

So, let it fly. I'm ready.

Maybe I'm naive, but if I thought that any of this was really serious, I wouldn't find it funny either.

I like this type of humor, I also like gay jokes, Polish jokes, white jokes, black jokes, Jewish jokes, Catholic jokes, Muslim jokes, etc., etc., etc.

I think too many people worry about being politically correct. I in no way condone rape or prejudice, but hey, we need to all have a sense of humor.

Personally I would only be offended by this type of humor if I knew the person telling the joke was actually a prejudice fuck or a rapist.

Sorry you took offense though.

JK

somekind · Post by **somekind** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 9:25 pm

My only intention was to violate her artistically. I don't really want to 'do it' with her. How old is she? 44? That's not that old. I'm almost there. Still, the idea is very open, and there are lots of fun pics of good 'ol Sarah doing funny stuff.

Ginger · Post by **Ginger** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 9:38 pm

I don't think anyone is seriously intending for her to be raped. I'm not a total tool. But when you use the word violate, then you send a message. Even if you would never wish that on your worst enemy- you have still send an unconcious perhaps message that what she deserves is rape.

I too love the off color jokes. It's a way to poke fun at the fucked up people who actually believe that shit. I don't personally think this is exactly the right place for it though. It's such a delicate area. You really need to know that your audience can understand that it is a joke. How do you know who's reading this? I read some post on here that make me think "that's no burner."

AND- rape is NOT sex! I think that your respone that you don't want to have sex with her shows that you don't get my point.

Post by **Elderberry** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 9:42 pm

Ginger wrote:
AND- rape is NOT sex! I think that your respone that you don't want to have sex with her shows that you don't get my point.

I think I do get your point; I just don't agree with it. I don't think it is sending any such message to any 'normal and well adjusted' person.

But you have every right to your opinion and I'm glad that you had the conviction to voice it--especially considering how new you are to eplaya.

You should fit in well here.

JK

littleflower · Post by **littleflower** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 9:52 pm

the tits are all wrong. palin's stacked. you couldn't find porn star with big boobs for this?

Ginger · Post by **Ginger** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:18 pm

JK- I feel right at home here.

I guess I'll just have to let you have your opinion too.

Post by **Elderberry** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:27 pm

Ginger wrote:JK- I feel right at home here.

I guess I'll just have to let you have your opinion too.

Thanks

JK

goathead · Post by **goathead** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:57 pm

Ginger wrote: I too love the off color jokes. It's a way to poke fun at the fucked up people who actually believe that shit. I don't personally think this is exactly the right place for it though.

Looking around, hmmm, it does look like the eplaya, sniff, sniff, kinda smell like the eplaya. Yep, pretty sure it is the eplay. So where in the hell would a better place for something like this be?

Ginger wrote: It's such a delicate area.

That's what the wife says also.

Ginger wrote: You really need to know that your audience can understand that it is a joke. How do you know who's reading this? I read some post on here that make me think "that's no burner."

Shhhh, look out for that Doc Pyro person. Did you see what he does with all of those Barbies?

theCryptofishist · Post by **theCryptofishist** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:39 pm

Hey Ginger, thanks for expressing some of what I felt. I had mixed feelings about posting to this thread at all, because of what you said, but I couldn't resist the shoe joke. I find it more than a little creepy that she gets sexualized in this way. Even though as far as I can tell, she was being flirty and seductive when she was winking at the camera during the debate. (I didn't see it, so I don't have a direct opinion.) I don't even know if I'd like it if we were also saying that McCain takes it up the ass (how I hate that phrase, but it seems appropriate in the context) from GWBush or even gets pegged by the Christian Right as personified by Palin. There was a remark a couple of months back when someone said something about how Clinton should leave the race and (as best as I can remember it) ~I hope the door hits her fat ass.~
FWIW, and I do wade into plenty of discussions with plenty of vulgarity, these remarks do get creepy on a visceral level. And there is something about constantly referring to the power discrepancies of sex that takes the life and joy out of something that's pretty damn good.
And people who whine about "political correct"ness are often lazy thinkers unwilling to examine the pain their carelessness causes. I don't know how else to be inclusive to a wide variety of people and experiences than to awknowledge that prissy and weak as that language often is, it is nonetheless worth the effort to work with it and be respectful of others' experiences, especially when you are reflexively exclusionary. I strongly suspect that women entering into full political partnerships and being in offices like the president and vice-president of the united states will coincide with changes in the ways we talk about the intersection of sex and power on both formal and informal levels.

And so many of the people who lambaste the left for "politically correct" language turn around and demand that people wear flag pins and never blastpheme. I'd love it if "religiously correct" became the meme PC is.

Bob · Post by **Bob** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:45 am

If I were a moderator the whole thread would have been deleted, maybe along with the shithead's eplaya account, and I wouldn't feel compelled much to give a reason. But that's just me.

goathead · Post by **goathead** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:42 am

Or maybe the question should have been

"How would you let Sarah Palin violate YOU?"

Imagine a picture of her in some nice spikes and leather.
John, Doc Pryo, and Barack on leashes,
down on their knees, barking like dogs.

Doc, I wouldn't be suprised if she had something special just for you.
LOL

Simon of the Playa · Post by **Simon of the Playa** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:18 am

violate.

1. to break (a law, rule, promise, etc.); fail to keep or observe; infringe on
2. to commit a sexual assault on; esp., to rape (a woman)
3. to desecrate or profane (something sacred)
4. to break in upon; interrupt thoughtlessly; disturb to violate someone's privacy
5. to offend, insult, or outrage to violate one's sense of decency

I'll take #5 for the win....

"I would call Jesus a Poopy Head and Shit on the Bible"

MikeVDS · Post by **MikeVDS** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:25 am

I can post an unedited copy on tikifuckos for you if you e-mail me a copy. We're not worried about obscenity.

Then I'll send you the link and you can go wild. We have close to 3 TB of downloads allowed so I don't think that'll be a problem.

Mike VDS (a.t) tikifuckos (d.o.t) ORG

MikeVDS · Post by **MikeVDS** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:28 am

Another place I think you can post that is imagefap.com but I'm not certain about their policy on hotlinking.

Das Bus · Post by **Das Bus** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:43 am

I'd 'do' her!

goathead · Post by **goathead** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:47 am

Das Bus wrote:I'd 'do' her!

LOL

Finally a politician the PEOPLE would like to fuck.

Toolmaker · Post by **Toolmaker** » Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:38 am

Das Bus wrote:I'd 'do' her!

Can I watch?

How would you violate Sarah Palin?

Re: How would you violate Sarah Palin?

Re: How would you violate Sarah Palin?