Looks like we may be going back on the gold standard.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtex ... l=h111-835
I think this is a good idea but I'm just a simple grease monkey type of dude. What do yall think?
What congress is up to these days
What congress is up to these days
This account has been closed as demanded by Wedeliver.
- ygmir
- Posts: 30403
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:36 pm
- Burning Since: 2007
- Camp Name: qqqq
- Location: nevada county
I don't see where they're required to "store" gold to back said dollar, and, just tying it to the price of gold is no different than it is now.....unless it's backed by actual metal, IMHO, it's just another accounting scheme to make it look like we have more money than we do........
As I see it, it would be that our dollars are worth more just because gold goes up, but, if we don't have gold to back it, then.............
just my 2 cents opinion......
As I see it, it would be that our dollars are worth more just because gold goes up, but, if we don't have gold to back it, then.............
just my 2 cents opinion......
YGMIR
Unabashed Nordic
Pagan
Unabashed Nordic
Pagan
so this is one of those newspeak empty promise things..ygmir wrote:I don't see where they're required to "store" gold to back said dollar, and, just tying it to the price of gold is no different than it is now.....unless it's backed by actual metal, IMHO, it's just another accounting scheme to make it look like we have more money than we do........
As I see it, it would be that our dollars are worth more just because gold goes up, but, if we don't have gold to back it, then.............
just my 2 cents opinion......
After Sec 3a I got lost in the language. I thought they were talkin about buyin up gold.
So I got excited for nothin.
Bummer
This account has been closed as demanded by Wedeliver.
- ygmir
- Posts: 30403
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:36 pm
- Burning Since: 2007
- Camp Name: qqqq
- Location: nevada county
that's how it strikes me anyway............Toolmaker wrote:so this is one of those newspeak empty promise things..ygmir wrote:I don't see where they're required to "store" gold to back said dollar, and, just tying it to the price of gold is no different than it is now.....unless it's backed by actual metal, IMHO, it's just another accounting scheme to make it look like we have more money than we do........
As I see it, it would be that our dollars are worth more just because gold goes up, but, if we don't have gold to back it, then.............
just my 2 cents opinion......
After Sec 3a I got lost in the language. I thought they were talkin about buyin up gold.
So I got excited for nothin.
Bummer
maybe, I missed the buying gold part, but, I don't see it......and, if it's not buying gold/silver, it's nothing by smoke and mirrors.....IMHO.......
I see there is talk of more gold being in existence than we've been led to believe. Not sure about it all, but, this is interesting:
.........................................................................................................
Feb. 24, 2009
Black Gold
The financial elite have been divided between gold and paper factions
Apparently there has long existed a big schism amongst the financial elite. The group around the Rothschilds who began creating fiat money (out of thin air) were able to accumulate enormous wealth. To keep themselves in power, they prevented certain parties (for example the Thai royal family) from selling their vast physical gold holdings. This created what is known as “black goldâ€
YGMIR
Unabashed Nordic
Pagan
Unabashed Nordic
Pagan
- CapSmashy
- Posts: 1917
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:29 pm
- Burning Since: 2007
- Camp Name: Terminal City://404 Village Not Found
- Location: Awesome Camp 2.0
Yep, great idea. Tie the value of our dollar to global commodity. It is quite obvious that many members of Congress never took any basic economics courses.
We came off of the gold standard because our economic security was tied to something we had zero control over. The Soviets dumped a massive amount of gold onto the market and crashed the value of the dollar on more than one occasion during the Cold War.
We came off of the gold standard because our economic security was tied to something we had zero control over. The Soviets dumped a massive amount of gold onto the market and crashed the value of the dollar on more than one occasion during the Cold War.
Playawaste Raiders cordially invites you to suck it.
- Ugly Dougly
- Posts: 17612
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 9:31 am
- Burning Since: 1996
- Location: เชียงใหม่
Hear, hear, and Harumph!CapSmashy wrote:Yep, great idea. Tie the value of our dollar to global commodity. It is quite obvious that many members of Congress never took any basic economics courses.
We came off of the gold standard because our economic security was tied to something we had zero control over. The Soviets dumped a massive amount of gold onto the market and crashed the value of the dollar on more than one occasion during the Cold War.
The gold standard seems to represent a holy grail to many, but it doesn't really mean that much. Balance of trade, though, has more bearing on the stability of the dollar.
Keep in mind that those who are rich and are working on getting richer, do not profit from stability.