Also, I submitted the term "Turner" to Adryan of BRC Weekly and he loved it.

This quote got me thinking. I took a look at the 2007 theme camp list (my first year) and compared it to the 2015 list of theme camps. I took all of the camp names and descriptive text listed for camps lettered A through F for both years and ran them through a word counter. I limited my analysis to the first 6 letters of the alphabet because it seemed to give me plenty of words to work with (~10,000 for 2007 and ~15,000 for 2015).jadewombat wrote:Lastly I compared the What, Where, When guides from years ago and there used to be an intelligent atmosphere of camps with puns and well thought out themes (remember Flight to Mars?). I compare this year’s guide and it has degraded to the lowest common denominator of genitals, drinks, and allures of “doin’ it.” And no, I don’t have a problem with sex, nudity, or people having a good time but there is a difference of genuinely appealing to people’s intellect or their sense of “just out to get fucked up.”
I disagree.Nekoyanagi wrote:However, people will only get as much out of it as they put into it. If some people don't get it, well that's too bad for them. But I don't think that these people necessarily ruin it for everyone else.
I vote for X. Nothing stays static forever. Everything, and everyone, constantly evolves, sometimes in ways we don't like or agree with.jadewombat wrote:Interesting stuff, Major. What about the word "Twerk" or "Twerking"?
Thanks for all of the input again. Good discussion going here. I believe that there's a fundamental difference of viewpoint here I'll test the waters on. Let me know which phrase you agree with more:
X) BM culture is somewhat chaotic, fluid, and adapts to the times and people. Although not perfect, the experience is unique and like absolutely no other on the planet.
Y) The event is well run, open and bringing out more good than bad in people but could also be seen as "Controlled Fun" by and large geared for adult crowds--inspiring creativity but up to a point.
I agree with X and Y, but in terms of past and present. As in, up until 2006, 2007, or 2008 the event was more like X, but now it’s become Y somewhere along the way. In those 2 options are whether or not you believe the BMORG has or does not have control of the event and steering the direction it goes. I’m firmly of the opinion that if you’ve been organizing this for 25 years, you already know what works and doesn’t work. Newer people complain less, I get it believe me I do.jadewombat wrote: X) BM culture is somewhat chaotic, fluid, and adapts to the times and people. Although not perfect, the experience is unique and like absolutely no other on the planet.
Y) The event is well run, open and bringing out more good than bad in people but could also be seen as "Controlled Fun" by and large geared for adult crowds--inspiring creativity but up to a point.
jadewombat wrote:they asked us “which camp we were with.” “Which” is the operative word there, there’s a difference with “where are you camping.” “Which” means that you have to belong to something, know so-and-so, or have contributed something significant. Hmmm.
jadewombat wrote:now there’s a sense that you HAVE to belong to something at BM
jadewombat wrote:if we assume for a moment that the intention of bringing in a very large percentage of virgins every year to expose the world to BM culture (or something along those lines), then at least realize what the effects are having on the culture and community.
I realize that some of you first and second year folks are really with it. In fact, I have a several friends who built projects for the Burn and SF Decompression for multiple years before going to the Burn. When I met one of them, and found they had worked on more projects than me, even though my number of burns was more than double theirs, I felt that they were burnier than me.CyanEssence wrote:I like to compare the massive amount of virgins being thrown into the burn to pouring too much ice water into a boiling pot, it stops the roll. Granted, if the fire keeps burning, all those new molecules will get up to speed, eventually. More to the point, there has to be a sweet spot as far as how many can be added without adversely affecting things.
as polarized as our society has become, I'm not about promoting divisiveness but you hit on something key here also in the bigger thought process. Smaller event or a bigger event spreading BM to the rest of the world? As great as BM is, is it for everyone? I don't think so. By the same token, Stanley Kubrick's films are not for everyone either, but that doesn't make them any less great than they are.CyanEssence wrote:
I once worked with Jerry James' son, a year or so after I first heard of the burn, and he told me why the split between Jerry and Larry happened, from his perspective. Larry's vision has become a global movement, but I am starting to see the beauty in Jerry's vision of keeping it low-key.
Yeah, but we're not talking about a monolithic company. Burning Man is a conglomeration of camps, and a lot of people who fill in the spaces between. For the most part, camps are in good shape and many benefit from Directed Distribution and other systems that ensure the cohesion of camps and villages.jadewombat wrote:Not sure if it was missed getting away from what was actually said further back up in the topic, but this is not about virgin bashing. Bear with me a minute, but here's a scenario: You're manager of a team of 20 people.
At the beginning of each year the owners of the company will cut roughly 60% of your team and replace them with new workers and as manager you have no input on who should or should not be replaced--regardless of experience or performance level these decisions are made by the owners. The owners also allow you to hire 1 new person each year.
Accidents and mistakes happen and weird, quirky rules are enacted. These rules are posted, but not everyone reads them. After 5 years how productive or effective do you think your team would be vs. if only 1-3 people were replaced each year?
These are good points Bbadger. The self-correcting idea is something I hadn't thought of before. It makes sense that people who prove that they will pull their weight will be more likely to get directed tickets, either because they run a camp/project, and get tickets from the org, or because the project leader/mayor/etc. sees that the person is worth getting a ticket to, because they will bust their ass to help make the project a reality.BBadger wrote: Sure, in 2012 with the lottery we saw severe fragmentation that impacted camps and playa projects; however, those were special conditions where BMOrg severely misjudged the effects that a truly random distribution of tickets would have, and a large amount of uncertainty created a large ticket recession. As it is now, however, established camps and builders are able to secure their tickets early, and also have sufficient community mechanisms to obtain tickets if needed. In my own circles, we've always been able to find tickets for people, even to the last moments. Most of the ticket scarcity problems hit the very people that you want immigration quotas on -- those people who lack the connections to secure their tickets, etc.
What about those unwashed new people? Let the playa sort them out. Sure, in the filtering process there might be some shit that gets stuck in the sieve, but that's just how it goes. After all, how will you know beforehand? If the answer is that only people who have been vetted by others can attend, I don't want a part in that kind of playa. Who would get to decide? Does it become some big nepotistic club? That'd be the real end of Burning Man.
I think this is a self-correcting problem. The people who create good things will more than likely have their minds blown and return to find the camps and groups who do likewise. The people with little invested will fill their bucket list and be gone. The sparkleponies and other dead weight will either shape up or need to find someone else to carry their burden. Even Plug and Play camps are too expensive for fair weather attendees to remain repeat customers. It'll all work out okay.