FossaFerox wrote:... to a mere 14". I know the threading makes the pull-out strength significantly higher than rebar, but still...|
You're counting on inline pull-out strength? That's not how you should be using pegs/stakes/rebar/etc..
- that's pretty hard to do on a Super-Fig-Lag with the pulling load offset by the link. For normal use of the Super-Fig-Lag, the threading is only for easy of getting it into and out of the playa. It also has strength for inline purposes too, but that's not the "normal" use of "pegs".
- A tent peg, stake, rebar, Super-Fig-Lag, etc., should be put into to the ground as far as possible, and the rope/load attached as close the the ground as possible; the load on it can't get any meaningful leverage from an above ground portion against a below ground portion if the whole "peg" is below the ground.
Big hint there. There's no leverage for an inline load. So why their concern? Because you should be installing the peg/stake/rebar/Super-Fig-Lag at an angle against the load. The load shouldn't pull it up out of the ground, but be pulling on it sideways.
In the image below, consider only the first peg. Pretty good angle and good line position. But the portion above would not be providing any holding strength. (and if the line wasn't next to the ground, the load would have leverage for pulling it out of the ground.)
In the second example, there's more strength as there's more peg in the ground.
The third is a technique for use in soft ground, or very large loads, to stop the pivoting of the peg and it tearing out of the ground. (The idea is illustrated, but the amount of peg in the ground and the placement of the rope is not optimum) (and at the top, the rope will want to slide down, at the bottom, it will want to slide up, which is really bad in the next example, but these are old examples just illustration purposes,)
Of course the last example makes better use of the strength of the last peg.
pegs.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.