The whole world needs Burningman.Only until we've seized the reigns of power and established our cult as a mainstream religion.
Long live DE FACTO....uh Larry......
But... but... that sounds so complicated and time-consuming. What if I just want to off hippies? Can't I just tag along?Zane5100 wrote:Only until we've seized the reigns of power and established our cult as a mainstream religion.Blenderhead wrote:So, you're saying we have to justify that kind of behavior? Why?Zane5100 wrote:Burning Man should have a bible.
Then we can have something to justify our behavior when we start killing hippies and yahoos by impaling them and making a forest surrounding The Man.
There are examples we can follow.
Uh, we'll be using impalement as opposed to roasting them en masse.Blenderhead wrote:Fine then, count me in. Guess I'll be doing some research in the flamethrower thread.
Come get me if things get exciting.
Ok, Vladimir....we're running out of stakes. Could you find a less intensive method of preparation please?Zane5100 wrote:Uh, we'll be using impalement as opposed to roasting them en masse.Blenderhead wrote:Fine then, count me in. Guess I'll be doing some research in the flamethrower thread.
Come get me if things get exciting.
Sure it takes longer, but you get to enjoy your work for a longer period of time.
Still too slow.Patience wrote:Crucifixion takes too long. I'm an instant gratification kind of guy.
How about poisoning?
Finally! SOMEONE sees the light! Er, the darkness... er.. um....Zane5100 wrote:No! No! No!Patience wrote:Crucifixion takes too long. I'm an instant gratification kind of guy.
How about poisoning?
The slowness is part of the point!
Goddamn barbarians! <throwing up hands in disgust...>
That seems to have been the model for the Burning Man website -- until they started cleaning it up recently.BlueBirdPoof wrote:Some years ago, I spent a little time musing on how a new "construct" intended to be a bible could possibly have that real "oral history with really odd lapses" quality that the "actual" bible has.
The best I could come up with was having a succession of people read it and then re-write it a week later without referring to the original, and adding anything else that took their fancy. Revisiting the idea, I see you'd have to have a bunch of rigid idealogues (or "priests") stick in something that really peeves them and blame someone else for it. And then have someone really crazy edit it, while refusing to clarify contradictions.