I know it works this way in theory, but I am unconvinced about the practice. I'm not certain how well you CAN restore the land from something as extreme as mountaintop removal, and I seem to recall controversy about the restoration from landowners in the area around where it is practiced. Also, there is the problem of living with an ongoing mountaintop removal mine nearby.mdmf007 wrote:Mines in the US used to have free reign on how they mine. Its been many decades since that was the case though. Mines must by law restore the land to as close to the same profile as before the project, I am not defending the mines, just pointing out hte fact that it is not as environemntally damaging as it used to be.
Overseas now, is a whole other story. Newmont Mining of Nevada is a worldwide operation, their record in the US is great, look at their S. America operations and they are poisoning streams killing people with cyanide accidents, leaving open pits, and raping the ground.
IMHO I think the US is probably the cleanest operators in the world.
later all
I think you might be operating from an old set of regulations. Mountaintop removal is fairly new, and newly legalized.
B.