BLM proposing raising fees - your help needed

hunter S · Post by **hunter S** » Tue May 09, 2006 5:32 pm

Can anyone bump this ???
It's way out of hand!

emily sparkle · Post by **emily sparkle** » Wed May 10, 2006 6:49 am

by bump, what exactly are you proposing?

hunter S · Post by **hunter S** » Wed May 10, 2006 7:18 am

I suggest moving the personal battle to it's own hidden corner of the world.
the start of the thread held relevant content. it has digressed into a cat fight! imop

ibdave · Post by **ibdave** » Wed May 10, 2006 7:39 am

While hunter is right to some degree, it reminds me of a playground fight. I'm just waiting for one of them to say, " My dad can beat up your Dad"

spectabillis · Post by **spectabillis** » Wed May 10, 2006 8:42 am

hunter S wrote:I suggest moving the personal battle to it's own hidden corner of the world. the start of the thread held relevant content. it has digressed into a cat fight! imop

not possible, unfortunately.

but thanks for speaking out.

k, badg... how about cooling it off a bit?

Kinetic IV · Post by **Kinetic IV** » Wed May 10, 2006 9:48 am

I'll back off, but if Cabanasprings gets attacked like that again it's right back on. That's the main reason I spoke up to begin with.

Isotopia · Post by **Isotopia** » Wed May 10, 2006 3:24 pm

So um Assanon, do you even know what anaerobic soil is? What it represents?

Kinetic IV · Post by **Kinetic IV** » Wed May 10, 2006 3:35 pm

So...you what do you want me to do, post my medical records online? Ain't gonna happen. I sent you a copy of the initial diagnosis from Anderson & KU Med as an email attachment to your stanford.edu address TWICE. What more do you want, do you want me to fly to Knoxville and hand deliver it and break down point by point what the diagnosis and treatment plan was? Give me a break. You had your opportunity and now to come back two years later asking for something I gave you? That's partly why I keep calling you ignorant and keep raising the discrimination flag when you rant and rave about me.

So what are you going to come up with next to try and attack me with?

spectabillis · Post by **spectabillis** » Wed May 10, 2006 6:37 pm

none of this has anything to do with with burninman, the org, or the board.

hunter S · Post by **hunter S** » Wed May 10, 2006 9:39 pm

Yea Spec! you the man! get this man a black & white striped shirt.

ibdave · Post by **ibdave** » Wed May 10, 2006 10:25 pm

Don't forget the Whistle....

Bob · Post by **Bob** » Sun May 14, 2006 3:59 pm

spectabillis wrote:none of this has anything to do with with burninman, the org, or the board.

Shirley, telling the BLM to go fuck themselves is not unlike telling creepy serial stalkers on the board to desist with overly personal bullshit -- just because they're part of the Thin Blue Line between the eplaya and the Russian Spammer Mafia.

spectabillis · Post by **spectabillis** » Sun May 14, 2006 6:09 pm

Shirley Says wrote:la la la... i am sure people understand it means that only so much personal shit is appropriate... la la la.

helitack · Post by **helitack** » Sun May 14, 2006 7:06 pm

Bob wrote:
spectabillis wrote:none of this has anything to do with with burninman, the org, or the board.
Shirley, telling the BLM to go fuck themselves is not unlike telling creepy serial stalkers on the board to desist with overly personal bullshit -- just because they're part of the Thin Blue Line between the eplaya and the Russian Spammer Mafia.

Don't call me Shirley

Otisserie · Post by **Otisserie** » Thu May 18, 2006 3:50 pm

Back to the subject at hand. Does anyone have an update on the BLM amendments? I heard that the BLM and BMOrg worked out a deal, but haven't had any confirmation. Did the letters we wrote do any good?

Rockdad · Post by **Rockdad** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:03 pm

http://burningman.com/news/blm_news_06.html

THANK YOUR FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENTS TO THE BLM!

At the end of April, we issued a Call To Action for our community to tell the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that we do not agree with proposed draconian stipulations that would allow the BLM to charge Burning Man even more money and also give law enforcement the unfettered discretion to evict participants from Black Rock City. In less than one week the Burning Man community rallied by sending at least 2,221 emails and 298 letters to the BLM voicing disagreement with the proposed stipulations. (The official number of emails and letters was probably even higher, but we are only able to count the letters and emails where participants also sent copies to Burning Man headquarters. We'll get the official count from the BLM in the near future.) Thank-you all for the deluge of wonderful comments and support!

Burning Man representatives met with the BLM and the Pershing County Commission to discuss the county's position about the proposed change in stipulations. The positive outcome was that Pershing County agreed with Burning Man that the BLM should continue to pay local law enforcement costs; not Burning Man.

Thanks to your support and the support of Pershing County, we are confident that we will reach a palatable agreement with the BLM very soon. Stay tuned!

capjbadger · Post by **capjbadger** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:44 pm

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nati ... ngman.html

Did we do it? Is this true? And what, if any, strings were attached?

Black Rocker · Post by **Black Rocker** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 4:25 pm

[quote="Rockdad"][url]http://burningman.com/news/blm_news_06.html[/url]

THANK YOUR FOR YOUR PUBLIC COMMENTS TO THE BLM!

At the end of April, we issued a Call To Action for our community to tell the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that we do not agree with proposed draconian stipulations that would allow the BLM to charge Burning Man even more money and also give law enforcement the unfettered discretion to evict participants from Black Rock City. In less than one week the Burning Man community rallied by sending at least 2,221 emails and 298 letters to the BLM voicing disagreement with the proposed stipulations. (The official number of emails and letters was probably even higher, but we are only able to count the letters and emails where participants also sent copies to Burning Man headquarters. We'll get the official count from the BLM in the near future.) Thank-you all for the deluge of wonderful comments and support!

Burning Man representatives met with the BLM and the Pershing County Commission to discuss the county's position about the proposed change in stipulations. The positive outcome was that Pershing County agreed with Burning Man that the BLM should continue to pay local law enforcement costs; not Burning Man.

Thanks to your support and the support of Pershing County, we are confident that we will reach a palatable agreement with the BLM very soon. Stay tuned![/quote][quote][/quote]

capjbadger · Post by **capjbadger** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 4:32 pm

Umm... Thank you Black for posting the very same info that is the post right before mine, but I was looking for confirmation and new infromation.

Black Rocker · Post by **Black Rocker** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 6:52 pm

Pyramid Lake would be a good alternative close to HWY 80. Let the Indians get some $.

d6 · Post by d6 » Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:10 pm

BLM and BM are hand-holding through 2010. AP story off the search engine

I don't care what you call me,

d6,
at one time a hander-outer of popped goodness fer 5 years,
and still a Bastard.

ubu · Post by **ubu** » Fri Sep 08, 2006 5:39 pm

yo d6, you be cool. you pass my turing test every time.

We may nonetheless, see this show move off of BLM land sooner rather than later. stay tuned.

spectabillis · Post by **spectabillis** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:29 pm

note: remove sticky status

emily sparkle · Post by **emily sparkle** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:57 am

done

BLM proposing raising fees - your help needed

Back to the Subject

What ever happened to the 4th admendment.