Maybe I will live long enough to see POT legal.
Give me something to look forward to when I retire and don't have to worry about piss testing anymore.
It's legal here in CA, but that doesn't stop the Feds from periodically raiding the dispensaries. Maybe that will ease up with the Obama administration.goathead wrote:Since the election has taken place.
Maybe I will live long enough to see POT legal.
Give me something to look forward to when I retire and don't have to worry about piss testing anymore.
Technically, it's illegal everywhere. Some states allow it for medical purposes or whatever, but federally, it's still a crime to have it. So that's why feds can do that. It's kind of at their discretion then.jkisha wrote:It's legal here in CA, but that doesn't stop the Feds from periodically raiding the dispensaries. Maybe that will ease up with the Obama administration.goathead wrote:Since the election has taken place.
Maybe I will live long enough to see POT legal.
Give me something to look forward to when I retire and don't have to worry about piss testing anymore.
I would vote to make all drugs legal. Seems a sensible thing to do. It would save millions in enforcement costs and free drug treatment could be made available to those that need/want it.
As far as drug testing at work, I have mixed feelings on that. Unfortunately there are people that have jobs that it's not good to be high while you are doing--like train engineers or high-rise construction workers for example. Should they be tested even if drugs were legal?
I think there needs to be much greater sophistocation in the testing--If you smoked on the weekend and were tested at work on Monday--the test would need to be able to discern whether or not you had enough drug in your system to be high at work, not that you smoked a day or a week ago.
JK
Why? Education and treatment, yes. But I don't think you can't pick and choose. Are you aware that some of the most addictive drugs are actually the ones that do the least long-term damage to health? If those drugs were available legally and cheaply, those people could function fine. Problem is always with crime committed to get money to buy the drugs--and of course drug dealers. both would disappear if it were legal.VelcroChicken wrote:
Maybe some strict control on certain ones, those that are highly addictive, dangerous, etc.
I'm talking like, the kind of control tobacco and alcohol is under now. As in not just putting it out on the counter for anyone to grab.jkisha wrote:Why? Education and treatment, yes. But I don't think you can't pick and choose. Are you aware that some of the most addictive drugs are actually the ones that do the least long-term damage to health? If those drugs were available legally and cheaply, those people could function fine. Problem is always with crime committed to get money to buy the drugs--and of course drug dealers. both would disappear if it were legal.VelcroChicken wrote:
Maybe some strict control on certain ones, those that are highly addictive, dangerous, etc.
JK