i'm very fond of badger as a personal friend, but don't think the history of his actions on this board make him suitable to be moderator.
Oh and Chai Guy as someone to consider whenever consideration is considered.
Some of the more effective moderator actions are done off-line in PMs. If someone gets called to the carpet over their behavior, it can be less embarrassing and involve less drama if those actions are taken away from public view.
Falls in with Trey's comment "agreed that moderators should achieve as much as possible by way of persuasion and finagling, and should probably be chosen for their ability to do so and reluctance to resort to other measures"
i wonder if moderators wouldn't prefer to remain anonymous (ie, have different login for their moderator self) that would allow them to also participate in their own conversational way without the baggage of the title of moderator.
III wrote:i'd expect there to be a team of moderators who cooperate, rather than simply distributing responsibilities.
Captain Fuckwit wrote: how to cope with a over-proliferating user like DVD Burner without censoring him or her. He'd be welcome to boing-boing his brains out
spectabillis wrote:Observation: This is the second time, in almost as many threads, that using peoples specific names as examples has made people feel the need to defend themselves. It will help the topic of discussion if we can keep the personal names out of it for now.
III wrote:well, there's yer problem right there. i think the admin actions in the past went from nothing to draconian to quickly.
let the board run for a while, learn what's working, see what (if anything), and then add moderation
Users browsing this forum: sassypickins and 0 guests