bisexuality

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Oct 19, 2003 1:48 am

too much beer, too little time. No llamas to facilitate process.

Kinetic II · Post by **Kinetic II** » Sun Oct 19, 2003 8:20 am

melissa wrote:too much beer, too little time. No llamas to facilitate process.

Llamas can really help bring clarity when others fail. As for the too much beer too little time problem, you have to work on drinking more. And make sure it's very good beer.

Alpha · Post by **Alpha** » Sun Oct 19, 2003 8:41 am

I'm not sure bisexuality is a good idea when llamas are involved...

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Oct 19, 2003 8:44 am

what the fuck is a llama?

Alpha · Post by **Alpha** » Sun Oct 19, 2003 8:52 am

llama!

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Oct 19, 2003 9:33 am

But in the context of this discussion?

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Sun Oct 19, 2003 1:52 pm

abeerinthemorning wrote:But in the context of this discussion?

I think with all the beer, melissa may have gotten the threads mixed up and thought this was the beastiality thread.

no harm done.

Kinetic II · Post by **Kinetic II** » Sun Oct 19, 2003 2:42 pm

It's a Maxis thing...if you play Sim City then you know Will Wright and Co have this thing for Llamas. Instead of city advisors you get llamas (who offer better advice). I might be wrong on Melissa's mindset about mentioning them here, but that's what I'm thinking of.

And that is a large amount of thread drift when we go from bisexuality to llamas. At least it didn't go on to cows with a PJ cow picture showing up.

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Sun Oct 19, 2003 2:48 pm

I should apologize to you Kinetic II
I did not know you were with sprint.

Last Real Burner · Post by **Last Real Burner** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 2:10 am

hey we try....

prehumosly,
Rabbi Dali Rick

Patience · Post by **Patience** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 9:02 am

That Lama is definitely bisexual.

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 9:04 am

Patience wrote:That Lama is definitely bisexual.

Which llama?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 10:34 am

Alright freaky burners, we now know that too much creative thinking is possible and fun. My llama refrence was in fact not from sim city, and as a matter of fact I have much distaste for such computer life sucking games.

Tell you what guys, I have one Burning Man candle left from the ones we made for the burn this year, and I will send it to whoever can guess my llama reference.

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 11:50 am

melissa wrote:Alright freaky burners, we now know that too much creative thinking is possible and fun. My llama refrence was in fact not from sim city, and as a matter of fact I have much distaste for such computer life sucking games.

Tell you what guys, I have one Burning Man candle left from the ones we made for the burn this year, and I will send it to whoever can guess my llama reference.

Wow! Am I in great company or what? you mean nobody got that right? I don't feel so dumb after all. This learning thing though....I think my head is going to explode. (not the one on my shoulders.)
This is exciting.

I think I'll do what i do best and Watch.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 1:41 pm

Want a hint? The english.

Kinetic II · Post by **Kinetic II** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 2:10 pm

http://andyllama.com/ehome/andyrescue/P ... e10084.htm

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Wed Oct 22, 2003 5:49 am

Can we please get some more bisexuality input PLEASE?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Oct 22, 2003 10:28 am

Nice tunes de facto man/woman/it.
You know Kinetic my brothers name is Mitch, but that wasn't quite what I was referring to. The english, llamas, and dry humor.

I am bisexual, but after my latest female escapade I have realized that women are evil, vile creatures so I stick to the more simple of the sexs. Doesn't mean I still can't look though!

JezebelinHell · Post by **JezebelinHell** » Wed Oct 22, 2003 10:39 am

Take it from a lesbian. Chicks are fucking insane!!!

Blenderhead · Post by **Blenderhead** » Wed Oct 22, 2003 10:42 am

JezebelinHell wrote:Take it from a lesbian. Chicks are fucking insane!!!

Shouldn't this be in the "Affirmations" thread?

Flux · Post by **Flux** » Wed Oct 22, 2003 10:57 am

melissa wrote:women are evil, vile creatures

and

Jezebel wrote:Chicks are fucking insane!!!

Ain't it the truth. I know being gay in this society is not an easy row to hoe, but there have been times in my life when I fervently wished I was homosexual for that very reason.

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Wed Oct 22, 2003 11:32 am

Another awsome thread bought to you by Digiman/De facto. be right back after this quick commercial break.

(that was kind of corney huh?)

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 3:35 am

.
.
.
.
.
.

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:01 am

Well I had to bring this up to the top.

What an ass hole I am.

Larissa · Post by **Larissa** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:37 pm

I didn't read all the posts, so this has probably already been said. But to me, being bisexual doesn't mean you can't settle down into a long-term relationship. It just means you have the potential to fall in love with either a man or a woman. I'm capable and have enjoyed long-term relationships with both sexes. It's about falling in love with a person, not their sex. Although, I do sometimes miss having sex with the other sex while in a monogamous long-term relationship, but that doesn't mean I'm going to cheat on my partner. Bisexual people do understand commitment, loyalty and trust.

Post by **actiongrl** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:52 pm

My tendency so far has been toward long term relationships with men, despite my equally compelling cravings for women. Luckily, there's not much problem with that about 99.98% of the time with any long term partner. I believe that relationships are less about fulfillment than they are about lessons, whether we generally choose to acknowledge it or not. I could envision a relationship with a woman, but somehow I just think that I'm here on earth to work out certain issues, and one of the core issues is my female to the archetypal male, so I am drawn to relationships with males for that reason. I don't shut myself down to any possibliity, but I think if I had a girlfriend for the long term, I'd probably still want boy energy often often often...not just penis, but male energy, that frisson that results from the differences. I couldn't be totally monogamous with a woman, I don't *think*, but I don't know. I've never tried yet.

JezebelinHell · Post by **JezebelinHell** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:31 pm

All my relationships with women have made me crave tequila and a shotgun.

DE FACTO · Post by **DE FACTO** » Thu Oct 30, 2003 12:55 am

actiongrl wrote:My tendency so far has been toward long term relationships with men, despite my equally compelling cravings for women. Luckily, there's not much problem with that about 99.98% of the time with any long term partner. I believe that relationships are less about fulfillment than they are about lessons, whether we generally choose to acknowledge it or not. I could envision a relationship with a woman, but somehow I just think that I'm here on earth to work out certain issues, and one of the core issues is my female to the archetypal male, so I am drawn to relationships with males for that reason. I don't shut myself down to any possibliity, but I think if I had a girlfriend for the long term, I'd probably still want boy energy often often often...not just penis, but male energy, that frisson that results from the differences. I couldn't be totally monogamous with a woman, I don't *think*, but I don't know. I've never tried yet.

sorry about qouting all of you but you are waaaayyyy too intense.

and that's not a bad thing.

I'm ......well......

Rob the Wop · Post by **Rob the Wop** » Thu Oct 30, 2003 8:48 am

JezebelinHell wrote:All my relationships with women have made me crave tequila and a shotgun.

I can see that. My g/f is bisexual and has had a number of relationships with women in the past. Your quote confirms most of what she has told me about those relatioships. I think there is an inherant difference between how women and men approach any issue.

Which is good (harmony can be achieved usually), but sometimes there seems to be a kind of human "feedback loop" going on. An issue provokes a response, which provokes a response, which provokes a response, ad infinitum. If the response is similiar to the original response, maybe what's needed is a vastly differing viewpoint to jar the cycle. Dunno, this is all conjecture from my end as I'm not bisexual.

Any input? The more I understand the viewpoint, the better I understand my shweetie.

JezebelinHell · Post by **JezebelinHell** » Thu Oct 30, 2003 9:28 am

I think the real problem is that when a woman is dating a man, she can always say, "What is it that men want?" and assume there's some universal answer. When you're dating another woman, you have to come to full realization with the fact that, just like you, most girls don't really know what they want. Plus girls play stupid mind games, which I don't tolerate. I think they expect fellow females to understand their rampant moodswings and tendency to say anything but what they actually mean, and I fail to comprehend this at all. I'm a straight shooter, and as such, will probably never have a lasting relationship with a woman.

bisexuality

Is there a really a God ?...