DVD Burner wrote:Apollonaris Zeus wrote:DVD Burner wrote:
The irony is, his girlfriend is Palistinian. :shock:
Youre fuckn with me DVD!
Gotta call you on this one- cites!
GREAT NEWS!
THIS JUST IN:
Israel prime minister Olmert says that he is seriously considering the Arab position mainly full pull out of west gaza and the partition of east jeruselum!!!!!!!
I would reconsider my non-support of Israel back to full support if they seek to fulfill the agreement! But they and all Jews must understand that there are those on both sides that will fight to see this fail! Enough so, that will not stop terrorist attacks to inflame both sides back in to conflict just as we are seeing in Iraq!
Voices and letters of support are needed now!
AIIZ
Ok now.....le's see......
I got it wrong. She is not Palistinian, she is from Tunisia.
:lol:
Just as well.
But I suggest you check out all that google comes up with on here:
http://www.google.com/search?client=saf ... 8&oe=UTF-8
It is rather fasinating.
Here is some new Revelations:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... Id=9642196
his girlfriend, bank employee Shaha Riza, did for a private contractor as the United States was preparing to invade Iraq.
In March of 2003, Pentagon contractor Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) hired Riza — while she still worked at the World Bank — for month-long assignment that included travel to Iraq. Officials at SAIC say they were told by the Defense Department to hire her.
At the time, Wolfowitz was deputy secretary of defense for the U.S.
Riza's supervisor, World Bank Vice President Jean-Louis Sarbib, says the circumstances surrounding the SAIC job were not transparent.
"I thought she had done this on a volunteer basis on her own time. I did not know anything about a contract with that firm," Sarbib, who is responsible for the Bank's Middle East and North Africa Region, said. "This was unusual and not terribly above board."
The assignment may have violated conflict of interest rules for World Bank employees.
"If you take contractual obligations with somebody else [outside the World Bank], there's something called the Committee on Outside Interests that has to pass judgment as to whether or not this is a potential conflict of interest," Sarbib said. "And I am not aware that there was any such request."
Riza's attorney Victoria Toensing says that her client did nothing wrong. She adds that James Wolfensohn, who was then president of the World Bank, welcomed the trip, and even asked Riza to brief members of the bank's executive board.
Toensing says Riza took an unpaid leave of absence from the World Bank for the assignment, giving up more than $10,000 in salary and benefits. SAIC confirms that Riza asked not to be paid, just reimbursed for expenses.
But critics say this isn't just bureaucratic nit picking.
"The real issue is, what is her role here?" said Bea Edwards, with watchdog group Government Accountability Project. She says revelations like this are damaging to the World Bank.
"How is she reconciling the fact that she is an international civil servant in one position ... while she is [also] a contractor for the Pentagon [as it prepares for war]?" Edwards asked.
Hmmmm, I wonder what Wifo's role was in getting her this job with no pay or how does that involve the bank if there was some future deal planned? I hope they do a full investigation.
mdmf007 wrote:Glittering Clitoris wrote:
I hope todays college shootings aren't terrorist related or your premonition may be true
What would you call it then - Pretty sure this is perfect example of Domestic Terrorism.
sick thing is its going to happen again, and again, and again. Gun control and laws arent the answer. - have to address the situation that makes people want to do this in the first place.
and this was done by an amatuer - an untrained college kid. What if he had any IED experience, access to chemicals, or a better plan other than randomly shooting people.
I guess you have to define what terrorism and its psychology.
In my opinion;
Either international terrorism or domestic terrorism in general has be perpetrated by an organization. And it must have certain elements to define as an organization. It must have goal whether its short or long term to disrupt a society, but it must point to an end.
And yes, an individual can disrupt a society, but he can't do it without a message, or if he does that message can be carried on by others in the case he dies or is captured. Domestic Racists organizations have that capability to carry on it's form of terrorism and their message is clear. International terrorists have that definative organization. Street Gangs or infamous biker gangs of the 50's movies were. Mobsters of the 20's-40's more terrorists of other Mobsters then the general public- not!
The sniper of the 90's what were their names? You know an adult and that kid. they were trying to act on the behalf of radical islam, but they were found out to be more nuts then organized.
I agree with you 700 that it is very like terrorism, but I don't feel terrorized like what 9/11 mades me feel- I might when I get back on a campus though. But I know there isn't a group of them out there. There was a guy that had mental problems and took it out on those that made him feel alienated. We know that he purposely didn't shot some individuals, but shot other right next to them.
I guess we should learn a lesson.. Be careful how you treat people or socks on Eplaya.
Who knows what could happen at the next "Meet and Greet!"
that's why I'm always nice to Dr pyro.
Never know what lurks in the mind of a man that marches Barbies into Ovens!
AIIZ