Media Responsibility for Imagery

All things outside of Burning Man.
Post Reply
User avatar
DE FACTO
Posts: 1263
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:02 am

Postby DE FACTO » Sat Nov 01, 2003 5:17 am

Look --

It's like arguing that attending Burning Man de facto turns you into some kind of pyro.


Huh? :shock:
even though...........
Top
User avatar
DVD Burner
Posts: 9750
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:09 am
Contact:
Contact DVD Burner

Postby DVD Burner » Fri Dec 19, 2003 5:47 am

First, showing us an image does not create desire. 'Sexing' the image up and creating desire for it is what the advertising industry is all about. If it were as simple as showing a product, any idiot could do it. Packaging, presentation and context are what make images compelling in an advertising sense.


I kind of disagree. If this were the case, Rappers would not be an issue.
Image

"The art is in the digit!"

The Original Digiman
Top
User avatar
Don Muerto
Posts: 718
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 4:28 pm

Postby Don Muerto » Fri Dec 19, 2003 6:00 am

DVD Burner wrote:I kind of disagree. If this were the case, Rappers would not be an issue.


Maybe it is early, but I don't get your point. Explain?
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
Top
User avatar
Lilly Flower
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 3:33 am

Speaking of Media resposibility.....

Postby Lilly Flower » Fri Dec 19, 2003 7:09 am

this is in todays N.Y. Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/19/opini ... ner=GOOGLE
You are watching too much TV.
Top
User avatar
stuart
Posts: 3328
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 10:45 am
Location: East of Lincoln

Postby stuart » Fri Dec 19, 2003 10:54 am

that article is full of wacky contradictions.

One of the Authors early statements is that Americans are the best informed people on the planet. He then goes on to complain about how we don't know what's really going on due to a lack of media coverage.

pretty sloppy stuff
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Open Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FIGJAM and 10 guests