What's a Palin

All things outside of Burning Man.
Post Reply
User avatar
ygmir
Posts: 30403
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:36 pm
Burning Since: 2007
Camp Name: qqqq
Location: nevada county

Post by ygmir » Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:54 pm

AZ, Gyre............
ImageImage

egad.....you're sounding like the conspiracy nuts you all laugh at........hahahahaha

Good parody,,,,,,hahahaha, well done.

I hope you got tickets on Louis Farrakhans (sp?) mother ship that he said is circling the earth waiting to send "his" people to lead and dominate us all...........

:roll:
YGMIR

Unabashed Nordic
Pagan

User avatar
somekind
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:27 pm
Location: chill valley
Contact:

Post by somekind » Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:59 pm

She's our sexy new librarian! Men love that and women feel comfortable with them.
http://burningmanvideos2007.blogspot.com/

If someone offers you drugs, it's a cop.
If someone asks you for drugs, it's a cop.
If someone fucks you for drugs, it's not a cop.

User avatar
gyre
Posts: 15457
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: ΦάÏ

Post by gyre » Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:43 pm

Sadly the bush administration has blocked funding of programs that help prevent aids all over the world.
Just say no. right?
The reason is condoms are birth control.

Like I said, blood.

wonderphil
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:09 pm

Post by wonderphil » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:17 pm

MikeVDS wrote: Again, do you have a cite for that? That's what I asked for in the first place and it wasn't a cite, it just brought us back to the same place.

Ok here it is



: 8)

wonderphil
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:09 pm

Post by wonderphil » Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:09 pm

MikeVDS wrote:
However I believe what Obama was doing under the guise of "organizing" was exactly what I said. He was very obviously working to promote "Black Political Power" We already have enough of that.
Again, do you have a cite for that? That's what I asked for in the first place and it wasn't a cite, it just brought us back to the same place.
One cite only (which would convince a reasonable minded person) may not exist. It would take reading lots of sources as I have done and then coming to your own conclusions. If it smells like a skunk, it may be a skunk.

I have already provided several of these cites or bits of the puzzle links in prior postings. several of the prior posts concerned the so called orginizing work and contain futher sources of scandles involving this so called work.

Obama's racist "black power" church and the anti American anti white rantings and ravings of two of the preachers caused Obama to quit his church for political reasons. Do you think he and his wife really changed their beliefs overnight?

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=59600

http://www.trinitychicago.org/index.php ... iew&id=114

Below are a few lines from Obama's books; In his words!

Might these attitudes be considered racism ? NO, the following statements are not racist because the speaker has an "APPROVED" racial background.

From Dreams from My Father: 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'

From Dreams from My Father: 'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.'

From Dreams from My Father: 'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.'

From Dreams from My Father: 'I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself , the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.'

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/02/ ... entor.html

Today, Cone's 2006 language lacks the initial shock effect he delivered in 1969 by labeling white society as the Antichrist, and the white church as uniformly racist. But, what he wrote in 1969 seems to remain at the core of his theology:

"There is, then, a desperate need for a black theology, a theology whose sole purpose is to apply the freeing power of the gospel to black people under white oppression."

Michelle Obama's recent statement (about not having been proud of her country until the favorable reception to her husband's candidacy). is thoroughly consistent with both the Africentric theology of Trinity UCC and with the black theology of their spiritual mentor's (Wright's) mentor (Cone). Her efforts to explain what she meant by her statement have, so far, been vague. The less she says, the better it will be for her husband's campaign. The more she elaborates on what she meant, the more damage she could do to his candidacy.

I completely agree with you about racism going both ways. The government is obviously the biggest perpetrator of racism against white people. My brother got caught in the whole affirmative action deal in California trying to get in the fire departments. When he was trying to get in, almost all fire departments were only hiring black firefighters. My brother doesn't care what color anyone's skin is, he's never had a problem with anyone except for their actions, he's never held anyone down, but he still felt the burden. I never give out my race on those stupid fill in the blanks (except medical), because I feel that the people with that information use it in racist ways.

That being said I also don't think any community looking to get people from that community in office is racist either. There are many communities that are mostly black and they have the right to get representation as well.
I agree with all you say above.
It's also obvious that you're quite young and a little weak in your American history,


Age is only relative but I consider you to be very wrong on both of the above statements. I am not as old as Union but I am older than most burners. Just because I have a different point of view than most of the brainwashed masses does not mean I am weak on any kind of history. In fact because I might be able to see through the BS I might be stronger on that subject than anyone on this board (and I have already forgotten many times more than most of them will ever know or that I know now).
because racism against blacks is still prevalent and was FAR FAR worse 30-50 years ago. It is not surprising that the current generation has not forgotten how bad things were and has a tendency to trust those who've gone through the same trials. Often "black" isn't referring to the color of their skin, but to the way they were treated and the things they've been called over the years. If it's based on experiences, not purely on skin color then it has nothing to do with race; except that America singled out that race and forced those experiences on them. Parents are going to teach their kids their experiences, so we may have to wait for the next generation for Americas bad behavior to be forgiven.
This is partially true but it also shows a sense of your white guilt (that you have been taught to believe).
because racism against blacks is still prevalent

Not that I see. It is now mostly the other way around mostly because of government. However I did not see white racism directly, having grown up in a 98% white area. Sometimes after leaving home I had a 1/2 white/black roommate who had a white girl friend. We got along fine and I did not see discrimination against him by any of our peers . I started to see racism later when I began to see the preaching of entitlement, hate, etc by certain black revolutionaries and preachers. The problem will not end until these hate mongers are out of business. But preaching to the proletariat and telling them how bad off they have it is big business, power and money for the preachers, so why should they quit? It is actually to their advantage to keep the people down, dependent on the state. The preachers may not intend to do that but that seems to be is the result. The black liberals seem to hate self starting blacks like Rice, Powell or Thomas who do not support their idea of an entitled racial group.

wonderphil
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:09 pm

Post by wonderphil » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:02 pm

gyre wrote:Sadly the bush administration has blocked funding of programs that help prevent aids all over the world.
Just say no. right?
The reason is condoms are birth control.

Like I said, blood.
Ok NO, you said shit, not blood.

Bush says he don't like to use them mother fuckin rubbers, he can't feel shit when using them.

Don't worry, an Obamanation admin will provide all the Africans flat screens TVs, the latest Hi DEf DVD's and porn tapes to use while using the rubbers he supplies

actually see my liberal rag references below;

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/world ... wanted=all

The United States government, the world’s largest donor of condoms, has bought more than nine billion condoms over the past two decades. Under President Bush’s global AIDS plan, which dedicates billions of dollars to fight the epidemic, a third of the money for prevention must go to promoting abstinence. But that leaves two-thirds for other programs, so the federal government’s distribution of condoms has risen, to over 400 million a year.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 941_2.html

Bush Has Quietly Tripled Aid to Africa
Increase in Funding to Impoverished Continent Is Viewed as Altruistic or Pragmatic

By Michael A. Fletcher
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 31, 2006; Page A04

President Bush's legacy is sure to be defined by his wielding of U.S. military power in Afghanistan and Iraq, but there is another, much softer and less-noticed effort by his administration in foreign affairs: a dramatic increase in U.S. aid to Africa.

The president has tripled direct humanitarian and development aid to the world's most impoverished continent since taking office and recently vowed to double that increased amount by 2010 -- to nearly $9 billion.
The moves have surprised -- and pleased -- longtime supporters of assistance for Africa, who note that because Bush has received little support from African American voters, he has little obvious political incentive for his interest.

"I think the Bush administration deserves pretty high marks in terms of increasing aid to Africa," said Steve Radelet, a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development.

Bush has increased direct development and humanitarian aid to Africa to more than $4 billion a year from $1.4 billion in 2001, according to the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. And four African nations -- Sudan, Ethiopia, Egypt and Uganda -- rank among the world's top 10 recipients in aid from the United States.

Beyond increasing aid to Africa, Bush has met with nearly three dozen African heads of state during his six years in office. He visited Africa in his first term, and aides say he hopes to make a return visit next year.

Although some activists criticize Bush for not doing more to end the ongoing genocide in the Darfur region of Sudan, others credit him for playing a role in ending deadly conflicts in Liberia, the Congo and other parts of Sudan. Meanwhile, Bush has overseen a steady rise in U.S. trade with Africa, which has doubled since 2001.

"He should be known for increasing -- doubling development assistance and tripling it to Africa after a period in which U.S. development assistance was essentially flat for decades," Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in a recent interview with the Associated Press. "He should be known for the largest single investment in AIDS and malaria, the biggest health investment of any government program ever."

To many longtime Africa supporters, all of this is surprising for a president who is often criticized as lacking curiosity about much of the world and who heads a political party traditionally skeptical of the efficacy of foreign aid.

But attacking African poverty has become a growing priority of some of the religious groups at the core of Bush's political base, and some lawmakers credit them with stoking the president's interest in the subject.

"The evangelical community raised the awareness of HIV and AIDS to the president," said Rep. Donald M. Payne (N.J.), the top-ranking Democrat on the House International Relations subcommittee on Africa. "When the Bush administration came in, HIV and AIDS were not an overwhelming priority. Now we have seen a total metamorphosis."

Current and former White House aides and independent analysts say Bush's interest in Africa is rooted in the numerous humanitarian crises that continue to bedevil the continent, as well as in the growing importance of Africa in a world increasingly linked by economics and terrorist threats.
Bush launched his $1.2 billion malaria initiative in June 2005 with the goal of reducing malaria-related deaths in 15 African countries by 50 percent. The disease kills more than 1 million people a year, most of them African children under age 5.

The malaria program complements the president's largest global health initiative, the $15 billion, five-year plan known as the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). Under the program, about 800,000 Africans are receiving drugs that enable them to live longer with the disease and help to prevent mother-to-child transmission of the virus.

"We launched one of the most important initiatives in American history, as far as I'm concerned, and that is the Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief," Bush said at a recent conference on malaria.

PEPFAR, which often funds programs through religious organizations, has come under criticism for promoting faith-based ideology over science, emphasizing abstinence programs and giving inaccurate information about the effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission. Payne says such concerns have been allayed in recent years, and he and others credit PEPFAR with saving hundreds of thousands of lives.

The Bush administration's efforts in Africa have dovetailed with a rise in aid to Africa from private groups, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as loan forgiveness from organizations such as the World Bank and stepped-up assistance from other countries, including Britain and France.

"I think [increasing aid to Africa] will be one of the things the president is most proud of when he leaves office," Gerson said. "It doesn't fit the preconception, the caricature that the president somehow has a preference for using the blunt instruments of force in international affairs when in fact on a variety of topics, the president has been a root-cause thinker in an unexpected way."


26 February 2008
Bush Urges Congress To Double U.S. Aid to Africa

http://www.america.gov/st/peacesec-engl ... 2e-02.html

User avatar
ygmir
Posts: 30403
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:36 pm
Burning Since: 2007
Camp Name: qqqq
Location: nevada county

Post by ygmir » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:24 pm

I'd rather see that aid money spent at home...........
YGMIR

Unabashed Nordic
Pagan

User avatar
gyre
Posts: 15457
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: ΦάÏ

Post by gyre » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:30 am

It's true the us isn't taken care of, but not because of foreign aid.
Also diseases from other places eventually end up here and the cost is not pennies for condoms then.

User avatar
Simon of the Playa
Posts: 22825
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:25 pm
Burning Since: 1996
Camp Name: La Guilde des Hashischins
Location: BRC, Nevada.

Post by Simon of the Playa » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:07 am

as a web agent provocateur, i get paid by the post....

and as far as sarah palin is concerned, she will come tumbling down when the
op/ops get some feet on the ground.

give it a week and that twat will wish she never left wasilla.
Frida Be You & Me

**burn**
Posts: 805
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:19 pm
Location: carousing in the corner

Post by **burn** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:09 am

She will be speaking in Northern Nevada Friday.
Risky

The Booby Bar in
http://terminalvillage.com

lurker
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 12:23 pm

Post by lurker » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:20 am

There was a fun thing that I saw with Obama chastising Palin for flip-flopping on the Bridge to Nowhere.

He said she was for it, but when she saw the uproar over it she flip-flopped and withdrew her support.

What's fun about it is that Obama didn't. He stood firm on the issue.

He voted FOR the Bridge to Nowhere even though it was clearly a money-sucking pork project.
"Life is like a box of razor blades. Sharp, shiny, and good for removing unwanted body hair"

User avatar
Apollonaris Zeus
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:17 am

Post by Apollonaris Zeus » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:04 am

ygmir wrote:AZ, Gyre............
ImageImage

egad.....you're sounding like the conspiracy nuts you all laugh at........hahahahaha

Good parody,,,,,,hahahaha, well done.

I hope you got tickets on Louis Farrakhans (sp?) mother ship that he said is circling the earth waiting to send "his" people to lead and dominate us all...........

:roll:
I can't argue with you now. I have to get into my bomb shelter they're spraying Chem Trails over my home in a black copter.

How did Louis find out about the mother ship?

User avatar
Apollonaris Zeus
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:17 am

Post by Apollonaris Zeus » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:10 am

wonderphil wrote: If it smells like a skunk, it may be a skunk.
te]


Or it might be green and sticky sticky

User avatar
Apollonaris Zeus
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:17 am

Post by Apollonaris Zeus » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:34 am

Home work?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/10/us/po ... lling.html

That's fucking stealing!


AIIZ

lurker
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 12:23 pm

Post by lurker » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:53 am

Stealing?

Judging by the lack of interest in this coming from Alaska, I'd say it's probably a standard policy in a state with so many travel issues.

But hey, what do I know? I'll reserve judgement until the people of Alaska start going after her for it.

Though I have to say, it proves my initial point--they're all gonna screw you.
"Life is like a box of razor blades. Sharp, shiny, and good for removing unwanted body hair"

User avatar
Apollonaris Zeus
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:17 am

Post by Apollonaris Zeus » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:04 am

lurker wrote:
Judging by the lack of interest in this coming from Alaska,

But hey, what do I know? I'll reserve judgement until the people of Alaska start going after her for it.
Why would the people of Alaska which are paid money from the oil industry just for being an Alaskan.

Why don't the people in NJ get check from Exon since they have their largest Refineries there too.

It's all about Bribery at every level.

Politicians and the people

I just got to laugh at this one: "Putting Lipstick on a Pig"
Obama is a funny guy and so is the pig!!

Oooop, I thought Obama was talking about Palin!

He was talking about McCain's Econ Policy

User avatar
cowboyangel
Posts: 6986
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 10:32 pm

Post by cowboyangel » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:40 pm

anybody that hunts and shoots wolves from an airplane or helicopter is sick on many levels. Sarah Palin does this according to reports I've heard from Gloria Steinnham.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believe is false."- William Casey, CIA Director 1981

User avatar
Ugly Dougly
Posts: 17612
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 9:31 am
Burning Since: 1996
Location: เชียงใหม่

Post by Ugly Dougly » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:08 pm

What are tax rates like in Alaska? I'd guess they don't have to pay any taxes, what with all the libertarians and oil wealth.

User avatar
ygmir
Posts: 30403
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:36 pm
Burning Since: 2007
Camp Name: qqqq
Location: nevada county

Post by ygmir » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:44 pm

cowboyangel wrote:anybody that hunts and shoots wolves from an airplane or helicopter is sick on many levels. Sarah Palin does this according to reports I've heard from Gloria Steinnham.
you gotta know if Gloria Steinham and Al Sharpton say it, it's right........

Image
YGMIR

Unabashed Nordic
Pagan

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Posts: 9360
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 pm
Burning Since: 2003
Camp Name: BRC Weekly
Contact:

Post by Eric » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:47 pm

lurker wrote:There was a fun thing that I saw with Obama chastising Palin for flip-flopping on the Bridge to Nowhere.

He said she was for it, but when she saw the uproar over it she flip-flopped and withdrew her support.

What's fun about it is that Obama didn't. He stood firm on the issue.

He voted FOR the Bridge to Nowhere even though it was clearly a money-sucking pork project.
Yes, but she came out against it and still took the money! She just didn't build the bridge with it. So she's against the bridge, just not the federal money. At least Obama isn't saying he was against it while still taking the cash.
WALL STREET JOURNAL, SEPT 9, 2008 wrote: But Gov. Palin's claim comes with a serious caveat. She endorsed the multimillion dollar project during her gubernatorial race in 2006. And while she did take part in stopping the project after it became a national scandal, she did not return the federal money. She just allocated it elsewhere. (emphasis mine)
That's from the Wall Street Journal, not exactly the pinnacle of liberal press.

(edited some lousy phrasing)
It's a camping trip in the desert, not the redemption of the fallen world - Cryptofishist

Eric ShutterSlut
Former Ass't Editor & columnist, BRC Weekly

User avatar
littleflower
Posts: 3420
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: rainforest canopy

Post by littleflower » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:54 pm

Ugly Dougly wrote:What are tax rates like in Alaska? I'd guess they don't have to pay any taxes, what with all the libertarians and oil wealth.
you are correct. i'm pretty sure they have a corporate tax, though.

wonderphil
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:09 pm

Post by wonderphil » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:08 pm

cowboyangel wrote:anybody that hunts and shoots wolves from an airplane or helicopter is sick on many levels. Sarah Palin does this according to reports I've heard from Gloria Steinnham.
In addition to being a slut and a pig as Obamanation supporters have claimed, Palin may even have balls.

(unlike many sniveling cry baby Obamanation white men).

:wink:

Now listen up cry babies:

In many cases there is a need to hunt wolves by helicopter. Wolves are intelligent pack animals and hunters can have a hard time keeping populations under control. If you don't already know what happens when a population booms.. then you have no reason to open your mouth.

Let me paint a picture for the uneducated. Wolves become overpopulated and eat up all the prey.. wolves starve and become infected with diseases.. wolves population crashes and prey animals populations boom without predators.. prey animals eat up all the forage.. prey animals begin to starve and become infected with diseases.. wolves populations boom due to easy prey.

Its an unhealthy cycle and the diseases that spread throughout the forest can destroy entire populations. With proper culling.. all of this death by starvation and disease can be avoided.

Alaska is not the only state where they do this. It is done even in states where they have reestablished the wolf after it had been wiped out.

http://fwp.mt.gov/news/article_7221.aspx

Besides keeping the wolf population under control leaves me more game and domestic animals to KILL AND EAT . Best of all is eating a piece of raw liver from a new kill, nice and bloody too.

Anyone who does not like this is sick on many levels

(except for the eating liver part. I hate eating liver even if it was cooked first).

User avatar
gyre
Posts: 15457
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: ΦάÏ

Post by gyre » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:34 pm

Just saw a hysterical Palin/McCain ad.
I thought it was an attack ad, but it was bragging about the stuff that is bad.
Too funny.

wonderphil
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:09 pm

Post by wonderphil » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:35 pm

littleflower wrote:
Ugly Dougly wrote:What are tax rates like in Alaska? I'd guess they don't have to pay any taxes, what with all the libertarians and oil wealth.
you are correct. i'm pretty sure they have a corporate tax, though.
For all the Obamanation people who think Alaska and Palin are owned by the oil companies read this.

I don't like this excessive tax policy either but I have reasons to believe that many of you Obamanation supporters like high taxes .

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/p ... ofits-tax/

John McCain and nearly every economist agrees that a windfall-profits tax on the oil industry would drive away investment, increase prices to consumers, and make Americans more dependent on foreign oil. If anyone wants to see that in microcosm, they only need look at Alaska. With the backing of Governor Sarah Palin, the state managed to drive away investment in development by hiking taxes on oil companies drilling on state lands:

Over the opposition of oil companies, Republican Gov. Sarah Palin and Alaska’s Legislature last year approved a major increase in taxes on the oil industry — a step that has generated stunning new wealth for the state as oil prices soared. …

BP Alaska, which runs Prudhoe Bay, said earlier this year that it had delayed the development in the western region of the North Slope as a result of the tax. ConocoPhillips cited the same reason for scrapping a $300 million refinery project.

“What the tax has done is take away all the upside,â€

wonderphil
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:09 pm

Post by wonderphil » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:01 pm

ygmir wrote:I'd rather see that aid money spent at home...........
I second that. Those billions Bush spent in Africa for health care could have been used for something at home for health care or whatever. Or better he might not have spent it all or he might have not increased the prior funding.

Bush has spent money just like a sniveling, bleeding heart liberal Dumocrat or worse. They still seem to hate him anyway (maybe he did not provide enough free rubbers or he also provided a program in addition that they don't like). They hate him for all kinds of reasons even made up reasons.

Anyway I don't know what he was thinking. You can't buy black votes if a black or part black runs against a white person, the white person has no chance in hell with 90 to 95% of the black voters. It does not matter if the white person was their best champion before. The Clintons and Obama have proven that.

wonderphil
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:09 pm

Post by wonderphil » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:30 pm

Ugly Dougly wrote:What are tax rates like in Alaska? I'd guess they don't have to pay any taxes, what with all the libertarians and oil wealth.
State Sales Tax
All states except Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire and Oregon, collect sales tax

Personal Income Tax
Seven states (Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming) do not tax personal income.

Tax Burden By State
It is estimated by the Tax Foundation that the nation as a whole will pay on average 9.7% of its income in state and local taxes in 2008, down from 9.9% in 2007 primarily because income grew faster than tax collections between 2007 and 2008.
New Jersey residents paid 11.8%, topping the charts. New Yorkers were close behind, paying 11.7%, and Connecticut was third at 11.1%. The top 10 were rounded out by Maryland (10.8%), Hawaii (10.6%), California (10.5%), Ohio (10.4%). Vermont (10.3%), Wisconsin (10.2%) and Rhode Island (10.2%).
Alaskans pay the least, 6.4 percent in 2008, but Nevada is close at 6.6 percent. In four states the residents pay between 7 and 8 percent of their income in state and local taxes: Wyoming (7.0%), Florida (7.4%), New Hampshire (7.6%) and South Dakota (7.9%). Four other states round out the bottom 10: Tennessee (8.3%), Texas (8.4%), Louisiana (8.4%) and Arizona (8.5%).


ALASKA
Sales Taxes
State Sales Tax: The state currently does not have a sales and use tax. However, some jurisdictions impose local sales taxes that range up to 7%. Anchorage does not have a sales tax.
Gasoline Tax: 8 cents/gallon
Diesel Fuel Tax: 8 cents/gallon
Cigarette Tax: $2.00/pack of 20 (Anchorage - add $1.32)
Personal Income Taxes
No state income tax
Retirement Income: Not taxed.

Property Taxes
Property taxes are assessed in 25 of 161 municipalities. Homeowners 65 and older (or surviving spouses 60 and older) are exempt from municipal taxes on the first $150,000 of the assessed value of their property. This also applies to disabled veterans. Intangible personal property is exempt from taxation. Call 907-269-6620 (Anchorage) or 907-465-2320 (Juneau) for details.
Inheritance and Estate Taxes
There is no inheritance tax and the estate tax is limited to federal estate tax collection.


corporate income tax

Alaska levies a corporate income tax on Alaska taxable income which is based on federal taxable income with certain Alaska adjustments.

Multistate corporations apportion income on a water's edge basis using the standard apportionment formula of property, payroll and sales. Oil and gas corporations use a modified apportionment formula applied to worldwide income.

Tax rates are graduated from 1% to 9.4% in increments of $10,000 of taxable income. The 9.4% maximum rate applies to taxable income of $90,000 and over.

Payment of the Alaska tax must be made on or before the 15th day of the third month after the close of the tax year. The payment due date cannot be extended. When an estimated payment is $100,000 or greater, or a payment with a return is $150,000 or greater, payment must be made online (TOPS) or by wire transfer. Tax returns are due 30 days after the Federal return due date. If the Federal return is on extension the Alaska return is automatically on extension.


More information about the corporate income tax may be found in the Tax Division Annual Report.

http://www.tax.alaska.gov/programs/prog ... aspx?60380



In addition Alaskans get a yearly check from oil revenue

wonderphil
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:09 pm

Post by wonderphil » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:38 pm

Apollonaris Zeus wrote: Why don't the people in NJ get check from Exon since they have their largest Refineries there too.
It is a totally different story on the refineries comrade, While, the refineries have something to do with oil and they may or may not be owned by an oil company. They are not much different than a chemical company, a plastic company a service station or about another thing in our life that needs crude oil to produce a product. On the other hand, The oil found under Alaskan State lands is owned by the state

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/l ... tax07.html

Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
While Congress and the presidential candidates debate the wisdom of a windfall tax on oil companies, Alaska has already imposed one, hauling in billions of dollars in new revenue for the state treasury.

Republicans in Congress this June united to defeat a proposed windfall tax on oil companies, deriding it as a bad idea that would discourage investment in U.S. oil exploration.

Things worked out far differently in the GOP stronghold of Alaska, a state whose economic fate is closely tied to the oil industry.

Over the opposition of oil companies, Republican Gov. Sarah Palin and Alaska's Legislature last year approved a major increase in taxes on the oil industry — a step that has generated stunning new wealth for the state as oil prices soared.

A wealthy state

Most of Alaska's oil production comes from land owned by the state — and leased to the oil companies that look for and extract the crude. But some of the most significant undeveloped resources are in areas owned by the federal government, such as the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge and federal waters in the outer continental shelf. Revenue from oil production there would go mostly to the U.S. Treasury, but the state could claim a small part of it, according to state Department of Revenue officials. Alaska's oil windfallby the numbers

$6 billion
Estimated revenue collected by state of Alaska from new tax on oil profits this fiscal year.

$10 billion
Estimated total oil revenue collected by state this year (old plus new oil taxes).

$1,200
Special payment to each Alaskan resident this year from new oil tax.

$2,000
Estimated annual dividend each Alaskan will receive this year from oil-wealth savings account, not counting the new oil tax.
How the windfall tax works

The tax is imposed on the net profit earned on each barrel of oil pumped from state lands, after deducting costs for production and transportation.
The tax is set at its highest rate in Prudhoe Bay, where the state takes 25 percent of the net profit of a barrel when its price is at or below $52.

The percentage then escalates as oil prices rise over that benchmark


It's all about Bribery at every level.

Politicians and the people
Ok comrade have it your own way, BTW if you would bother to check you will find the refinerys are already taxed as are all the rest of the industries I mentioned.
I just got to laugh at this one: "Putting Lipstick on a Pig"
Obama is a funny guy and so is the pig!!

Oooop, I thought Obama was talking about Palin!

He was talking about McCain's Econ Policy[/quote
]

It was clear from the crowd reaction that they knew what he was talking about just as you did. -- I do not support Obama so I think it is great that the Obamanation continues to take the low road approach unstead of trying to find something that someone might actually believe or might gain him votes instead of costing him votes as he is now doing. While he has claimed and continues to claim that he is above that shit.

wonderphil
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:09 pm

Post by wonderphil » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:33 am

Simon of the Playa wrote: as far as sarah palin is concerned, she will come tumbling down when the
op/ops get some feet on the ground.

give it a week and that twat will wish she never left wasilla.
I guess this is what you mean

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1220981 ... ical_diary

BTW

The One says attacks on him are unpatriotic

Obama: Attacks on me are unpatriotic!
By Michelle Malkin • September 10, 2008 11:21 PM

You know my favorite part of Barack Obama’s response to the lipstick bungle? It’s this obnoxious phrase, which hasn’t been remarked upon much today:

“I don’t care what they say about me but I love this country too much to let them take over another election…â€

User avatar
MikeVDS
Posts: 1899
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:10 pm
Burning Since: 2006
Camp Name: Tiki Fuckos
Location: Tiki Fuckos, Upland CA
Contact:

Post by MikeVDS » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:58 am

Wonderphil, I wonder if you actually believe all the crap you post because it's complete B.S. (Well, 95%). I personally disagree with a lot of Obama's politics but all of the false characterizations just make you look like an idiot who has no original ideas. If you don't like him and want to convince people otherwise, fine, but I'd appreciate it if you used facts and backed them up. The whole echoing retarded radio show hosts, "Obama can't be criticized" rhetoric makes you look even more pathetic than those who make up that crap.
[img]http://tikifuckos.org/anisign.gif[/img]

User avatar
ygmir
Posts: 30403
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:36 pm
Burning Since: 2007
Camp Name: qqqq
Location: nevada county

Post by ygmir » Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:54 am

MikeVDS:
In reading this entire thread, over, I wonder:
does your above chastisement apply to those on the opposite side of wonderphil?
Seems there is a fair amount of hyperbole, and far off conspiratorial accusation there, too.........and mis/dis information.

seems politics can bring out interesting characteristics in us all.........
Particularly, I see people accusing the "other" of things their candidate is guilty of, but, somehow, whitewashing it, or, something like "well, (blank) isn't nearly as bad as (blank)", if they can't deny their actions altogether.
The old hypocrisy syndrome..........

Another is making bold (IMHO) statements regarding how honest, or moral (pick your term) 'their' candidate is, and how evil the 'other'.......
Yikes!!!
I'd still submit you don't rise that high being and angel..........it's just who hides their skeletons the best........and, again IMHO, who the leftist media wants to promote.......and mostly, they do what they do for ratings, but, are, at a minimum, "left justified".........
YGMIR

Unabashed Nordic
Pagan

Post Reply

Return to “Open Discussion”