my mind begins to hum...

All things outside of Burning Man.
Post Reply
User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:36 pm

Image

User avatar
the fire elf
Posts: 7300
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:43 pm
Burning Since: 2002
Location: nation

Post by the fire elf » Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:44 pm

Image

User avatar
the fire elf
Posts: 7300
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:43 pm
Burning Since: 2002
Location: nation

Post by the fire elf » Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:44 pm

Image

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:15 pm

Image

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:17 pm

Definition of Sampling

– A term used in statistics. Sampling is the process of choosing a
representative sample from a population, then collecting data from that
sample in order to understand something about the population as a whole.

Here is a simple illustration.

You have before you a freshly baked
homemade cherry pie (the greater whole) and you are pondering the
question, “I wonder if it is delicious?â€

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:21 pm

The terms "a priori" and "a posteriori" are used in philosophy to
distinguish two different types of knowledge, justification, or argument: a
priori knowledge is known independently of experience, and a posteriori
knowledge is proven through experience. Thus, they are primarily used
as adjectives to modify the noun "knowledge", or taken to be compound
nouns that refer to types of knowledge

Image

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:24 pm

Image
experiencece. hey us, tand "a , and distinguish eto beori" a posteriori
xperindependentlnoun "knowledges refer knowleenphilosophy of are
primarily dge is pradjectives to two diffeito Thknown ifju y used as
oftomod rmthe stification, or argtakenrent "a pposteriori" are umpriori
used in rithrough ent: a that , or yof kntypes oven compound The
teknowledge isowledgenounstypes
"knowledge,

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:24 pm

Image

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:44 pm

Image









































Image

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:46 pm

Image

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:50 pm

Image

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:24 pm

Seneca addresses the question of mastering anger in three parts:

1. how to avoid becoming angry in the first place
2. how to cease being angry and
3. how to deal with anger in others.

Seneca suggests, in order to avoid becoming angry in the first place, that
the many faults of anger should be repeatedly remembered.
One should avoid being too busy or deal with anger-provoking people.
Unnecessary hunger or thirst should be avoided and soothing music be
listened to.

To cease being angry, Seneca suggests "one to check speech and
impulses and be aware of particular sources of personal irritation. In
dealing with other people, one should not be too inquisitive: It is not
always soothing to hear and see everything. When someone appears to
slight you, you should be at first reluctant to believe this, and should wait
to hear the full story. You should also put yourself in the place of the
other person, trying to understand his motives and any extenuating
factors, such as age or illness." Seneca further advises daily self-
inquisition about one's bad habit.

To deal with anger in others, Seneca suggests that the best reaction is to
simply keep calm. A certain kind of deception, Seneca says, is necessary
in dealing with angry people.

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:25 pm

Image

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:31 pm

A question raised by Van Kleef et al. based on these findings was whether
expression of emotion influences others, since it is known that people use
emotional information to conclude about others’ limits and match their
demands in negotiation accordingly. Van Kleef et al. wanted to explore
whether people give up more easily to an angry opponent or to a happy
opponent. Findings revealed that participants tended to be more flexible
toward an angry opponent compared with a happy opponent. These
results strengthen the argument that participants analyze the opponent’s
emotion in order to conclude about their limits and carry out their
decisions accordingly.
Image

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:33 pm

Image
Negotiation is a dialogue intended to resolve disputes

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:33 pm

ass hats

User avatar
the fire elf
Posts: 7300
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:43 pm
Burning Since: 2002
Location: nation

*a-hem*

Post by the fire elf » Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:08 am

you think you just go poof?

e=mc^2

energy is a form of matter

conservation of mass

brainyacts
instantiate vacuous truth

User avatar
the fire elf
Posts: 7300
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:43 pm
Burning Since: 2002
Location: nation

now tell me

Post by the fire elf » Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:10 am

who are you?
instantiate vacuous truth

erri2000
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:33 pm

Post by erri2000 » Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:47 am

We seem to be listening to the same radio station.

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:03 pm

group project

sculpture: 0's and 1's stacked

ready,

set...

oh, wait...

User avatar
the fire elf
Posts: 7300
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:43 pm
Burning Since: 2002
Location: nation

Post by the fire elf » Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:28 pm

Image

User avatar
the fire elf
Posts: 7300
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:43 pm
Burning Since: 2002
Location: nation

Post by the fire elf » Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:30 pm

Image

User avatar
Apok
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:29 pm

Post by Apok » Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:32 am

Image

User avatar
Apok
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:29 pm

Post by Apok » Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:34 am

Image

User avatar
the fire elf
Posts: 7300
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:43 pm
Burning Since: 2002
Location: nation

Post by the fire elf » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:55 am

[youtube][/youtube]

User avatar
the fire elf
Posts: 7300
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:43 pm
Burning Since: 2002
Location: nation

Post by the fire elf » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:00 pm

ImageImage

User avatar
the fire elf
Posts: 7300
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:43 pm
Burning Since: 2002
Location: nation

Post by the fire elf » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:04 pm

satan= name based thought reform
santa= name based thought reform

thereby

satan=santa
instantiate vacuous truth

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:07 pm

[youtube][/youtube]

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:10 pm

Image
Image

User avatar
mayavin
Posts: 3779
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:21 am

Post by mayavin » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:12 pm

Image
sphera spinning circa gradually midst photon shaft grazing electron soo flit while neutron's gazing

Post Reply

Return to “Open Discussion”