New World Order Marchs On....

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:05 am

You can't very well win if you're a soldier. If you retain your humanity and sensitivity, you're traveling the road to psychosis and self-destruction. If you submerge your humanity and desensitise yourself , you drift towards brutality and psychosis.
It's up to the commanders to set the "moral tone" of the conflict. The Luftwafte had different moral direction than the Gestapo. The commanders are rightfully held responsible. They are far enough removed from the gore of battle to maintain some sort of moral equilibrium in the direction of the grunts.
The U.S. "leadership" has adopted a "win at all costs" attitude. This translates to a far more brutal approach, wether in politics or battle. Our entertainment industry makes things worse with endless gore. What is the long range outlook for an increasingly desensitised and brutal populace? How brutal can we get and still function as a society?
The commerce dept says that there are 17,000 assaults and 23 murders in the American workplace every WEEK. Our leaders have set the moral tone and society is slowly ripping itself apart.
NWO plans to control all capital. Their mechanism to control all people is obvious,,,fear. That should make for a truly wonderful society. I'm sure that the birth rate will reflect everyone's happiness.

Apollonaris Zeus · Post by **Apollonaris Zeus** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:27 pm

Where's the Rabbi?

Ugly Dougly · Post by **Ugly Dougly** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:03 am

can't sit still wrote:You can't very well win if you're a soldier. If you retain your humanity and sensitivity, you're traveling the road to psychosis and self-destruction. If you submerge your humanity and desensitise yourself , you drift towards brutality and psychosis.

Your only hope is to join the insurgency.

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Sat Jun 16, 2007 3:23 pm

The second spawn of NWO,,,NAU is having birthing problems. Fox said "you take our excess population and you can have the oil." Bush said "oil, oil,,,, did you say oil?"
Americans aren't completely happy with everything that has come up from the southern border. The wages have been depressed in the name of margin and global competiveness. The new Texas superhighway isn't there to bring good salaries and quality of life. Americans are in favor of quality of life and some enviornmental protection. NWO and american business have proved themselves more than willing to shaft anything that gets in the way of profits,,,obscene or otherwise.
NWO is the corporatists dream of a corporate world. Maximum profit, minimum waste. No business impediments,,, maximum business leverage.
Right now, our grain reserves are the lowest they've been in 80 years[except for the war years] There's no leverage like food leverage.
There isn't a shadow of a doubt what unconstrained business would do to the enviornment.
To the corporatist viewpoint, all cogs are interchangeable. All bad cogs must be eliminated. [read, anyone who doesn't agree with me is a terrorist]
If NWO had the high ideal of eliminating war as being wasteful, then it might be an improvement. If you eliminated war, there should be enough to go around for everybody. Somehow, I don't think that the military industries are going to just,,,leave.
NAU is a business proposition. America gets an influx of people to make up for our population decline. Mexico gets an outlet for their excess population. America gets oil to postpone the coming crunch. Canada gets workers to speed up development of it's huge reserves of natural resources. It's a win-win situation as long as you're not a wage earner or mother earth.

Just Watching · Post by **Just Watching** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:28 pm

DVD Burner wrote:There will be no 2008 elections.

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:01 pm

Here's a thought if you want a giggle; Texans have always been pretty patriotic. Why would the shrub want to create a north American union? Did you ever get the feeling that there was something that they weren't telling us? Suppose the ice melts and lowers the salinity of the north atlantic? The climatologists project that that would stop the "atlantic conveyor" OK They say that the northern lattitudes would get cooler. OK, still not too bad.
Some very interesting "ice core" results from Greenland seem to show that ice ages were preceeded by a short warm period. There was even 1 period just before an ice age that warmed up 6 timese faster than we are warming up.
We're in the Holocene that has gone along very balmy for an unusually long time. IF we were in a runup to an emerging ice age, I would definitely want access to warmer latitudes.
If you want some interesting reading, you should look at what the Mayan calendar says about "end times",,, the year 2012. There are many end times stories floating around. The Mayans differ in that they base their
calculations on planetary alignment.
The thing that makes their stuff interesting is the work of Jennifer Lawson. She has a PHD. She has written books of storm predictions [and a little earthquake] based on planetary alignment.
Homo-sapiens has been through 2 ice ages already,,,,,,, but only as a hunter-gatherer.
Very interesting.
Dan

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:14 pm

Just Watching wrote:
DVD Burner wrote:There will be no 2008 elections.

We shall see soon enough.

Green Wood · Post by **Green Wood** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:46 pm

can't sit still wrote:We're in the Holocene

That's funny, because I thought we were in the Holo-Deck and the cancel command wasn't working!!!

So where is Dali he hasn't posted here in a while

Aiee! It burns! · Post by **Aiee! It burns!** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:57 am

Just Watching · Post by **Just Watching** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:16 am

DVD Burner wrote:
Just Watching wrote:
DVD Burner wrote:There will be no 2008 elections.

We shall see soon enough.

In a little over a year. What I'm wondering is when we do, and indeed there are no tanks rolling through the streets, the elections have indeed been held, and your prediction has not been borne out, how will you deal with that? Will you

1. Try to claim that the election wasn't a real election?
2. Try to pretend that you never said that there weren't going to be any 2008 elections, and continue to pretend this even as links to the post in which you made this claim are presented?
3. Morph into a new user, who starting fresh, will be able to delight us with a whole new barrage of conspiracy theories?
4. Honestly own up to the fact that you were wrong?
5. Fall over laughing because I am, in fact, feeding the trolls?
6. Something else entirely?

Enquiring minds want to know.

Just Watching · Post by **Just Watching** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:19 am

Aiee! It burns! wrote:

Yeah. How long ago was that published, and how many times has the imminent fall of American democracy been predicted since that time? Notice a pattern?

MikeVDS · Post by **MikeVDS** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:56 am

3. Morph into a new user, who starting fresh, will be able to delight us with a whole new barrage of conspiracy theories?

Since you appeared all of a sudden and are quite vocal, I was wondering if you did that yourself? Minus the conspiracies though.

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:56 am

Interesting Fulford; http://www.rense.com/general84/fee.htm

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Tue Dec 23, 2008 8:25 am

Here's an interesting view of the big picture that includes our current financial problems;
http://www.williammcgill.com/worlds-big ... -unfolding

Ugly Dougly · Post by **Ugly Dougly** » Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:48 am

Just Watching wrote: Yeah. How long ago was that published, and how many times has the imminent fall of American democracy been predicted since that time? Notice a pattern?

I am so happy to learn that it can never happen here! Thanks, JW!

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:36 am

Various people have various predictions. The CEO of Trends Research is Celente. His accuracy is astounding. He's now using the "R" word and I don't mean recession;
http://www.rense.com/general84/top.htm

Boijoy · Post by **Boijoy** » Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:41 am

" R " Rudolph ?

Boijoy · Post by **Boijoy** » Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:41 am

oh oh !! Rubber ?

Barbie · Post by **Barbie** » Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:12 am

RUDOLPH

Toolmaker · Post by **Toolmaker** » Thu Dec 25, 2008 8:48 am

Reefer.. the best cure for the NWO blues.

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:18 pm

A bit more NWO news;
http://news.goldseek.com/InternationalF ... 570891.php

Ugly Dougly · Post by **Ugly Dougly** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:35 am

can't sit still wrote:A bit more NWO news;
http://news.goldseek.com/InternationalF ... 570891.php

Gee, "Gold Seek" isn't a little biased?

Looks like they might be paying their bills by selling gold.
Yeah, news you can trust.

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:30 pm

Would you rather trust an honest gold salesman or the US GOV?

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:56 pm

Isn't the information age just wonderful?
http://aclu.org/pizza/images/screen.swf

littleflower · Post by **littleflower** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:20 pm

Just Watching wrote:
DVD Burner wrote:
Just Watching wrote:

We shall see soon enough.
In a little over a year. What I'm wondering is when we do, and indeed there are no tanks rolling through the streets, the elections have indeed been held, and your prediction has not been borne out, how will you deal with that? Will you

1. Try to claim that the election wasn't a real election?
2. Try to pretend that you never said that there weren't going to be any 2008 elections, and continue to pretend this even as links to the post in which you made this claim are presented?
3. Morph into a new user, who starting fresh, will be able to delight us with a whole new barrage of conspiracy theories?
4. Honestly own up to the fact that you were wrong?
5. Fall over laughing because I am, in fact, feeding the trolls?
6. Something else entirely?

Enquiring minds want to know.

i just saw this! chicken little is so appropriate to this thread.

littleflower · Post by **littleflower** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:21 pm

can't sit still wrote:Would you rather trust an honest gold salesman or the US GOV?

how do you know the gold guy is honest?

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:47 pm

A friend of mine asked me to loan her some money for a short period of time. I sold a bunch of gold back to my supplier without him batting an eye. She eventually repaid me by buying it all back. No acid test, no questions.

littleflower · Post by **littleflower** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:34 pm

have you never dealt with an honest government employee?

Toolmaker · Post by **Toolmaker** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:01 am

http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/
http://www.prisonplanet.com
http://www.infowars.com

[youtube][/youtube]

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Sun Jul 19, 2009 10:36 am

This is a very interesting read;
http://www.infowars.com/in-1969-rockefe ... trialized/
Dan