Post
by Maia » Sat May 22, 2004 12:42 pm
To follow up on your second part,, as I say too often, the Black Rock Desert is a place of surreal beauty, solitude and silence. Burning man was ok when it was a few thousand, the ripple effects of todays events are a desecration. I know that the BM PR is that it is "leave no trace", but that is far from correct.
The event should be moved out of the Black Rock Desert. Nevada is the dumping ground for the nation, nuclear waste, nuclear testing. The garbage from the Bay Area and Sacramento comes to Nevada, burning man is just another colonial outpost of California imposed on a state without the political clout to block it.
Here is something to think about, Yucca Mountain is scheduled to be the nations nuclear waste repository.. Yet, the continent is splitting apart due to cellular convection underneath Yucca Mountain, Nevada is unzipping. It is the third most Tectonicly active state after Alaska and California. It does not take a rocket scientist to see that placing radioactive waste with a half life of 10,000 years in Nevada is foolish.. Far better to place it in Michigan on the giant craton that can't have an earth quake...
But, Michigan has population,, congressmen, clout. No chance of doing the right thing and burying the stuff there. It will come to cloutless Nevada, same with burning man. It is in the Black Rock 'cause California won't have it and has the clout to prevent it.
When you combine that with the social issues, rural Nevadans are extremely conservative, the burning man attendees are by rural Nevada standards extremely wierd (my opinion is a bit different, I see them as weak, soft pale indoors types,, certainly not the sort you want to spend a week in the desert with, but then remember, it isn't really the desert any more, for that week the population density of black rock city is identical to Detroit Michigan 7,500 per sq mile), You find that for the most part only those who make money off burning man like having it appear,, like a cold sore every year..