lbdavid98 wrote:Clearly it was an attempt by the committee to encourage Obama to use his position as president to take this country in a new direction. They understood their purpose, I'm sure Obama is smart enough to figure it out, so the only question is whether or not he'll live up to the honor,,,if police and citizens were unarmed then the only people with weapons would be the criminals, and do we have any doubt that they'd use them as a force for more destruction? ,,, I'd rather the UN make these decisions, but I do believe that sometimes they have to be made.
Since when is the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to incite an agenda or manipulate a nation's leader?
Whether or not he'll live up to the honor??? Isn't that cart before the horse thinking?
Disarming the public is most definitely the agenda of Progressives and the U.N. Don't think for a second an armed citizenry is the goal of anyone in the current administration!
The U.N. cannot decide whether to shit or get off the pottychair!!!
i'm jus' sayin',,,
...........................................