$1Trillion of untapped minerals in Afghanistan

All things outside of Burning Man.
User avatar
geekster
Posts: 4865
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:53 pm
Location: Hospice For The Terminally Breathing
Contact:

Post by geekster » Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:45 pm

cowboyangel wrote:So, we're "nice" then you recommend we wipe villages off the map? Did I read that right? I guess you're with Joe Barton. Now we need a nuke disaster to wake you up too I suppose.
Of course you didn't read that right. I said we try to be too "nice" when to throw a GBU at a compound once a week or so and engage them in firefights in the surrounding countryside or try to pick off a couple of guys in a pickup truck with a Predator.

The policy would be to evacuate the town, scrape it down to bare earth and leave. It would probably have to be done only once or twice. Seriously. You end up putting an end to the violence in a much shorter period of time and end up with a lot fewer people killed. If they still give any lip, literally plow the fields with salt to make them unusable for a few years.

See, here is the problem that a lot of people can't get through their head is that the Taliban survives only at the pleasure of the local population. If after 10 years of trying to plink Taliban, you still have more Taliban, that should be your first clue that what you are doing isn't working.

If the population wants to support the Taliban, fine, they should pay a price for that. Consider it an economic sanction. They allow the terrorists to operate out of their village, fine, they lose the village.

It wouldn't take too many such villages being razed before the villagers tell the Taliban to take a hike. WE can't approach it in that manner but the Chinese can and would have little worry about doing something like that.

Remember a couple of years ago when Uyghurs in Xinjiang were raising hell? China simply bulldozed the mosque. Took it right down to dirt. They settled right down after that. China didn't attempt to locate those responsible, have some drawn out trials for several years, have people in prison that would generate riots of people demanding they be set free. They just bulldozed the mosque. That sends a powerful message and doesn't kill anybody. It just says "keep it up and you will go backwards and you will keep going backwards until you straighten up and fly right".

There has been only one successful invader subdue that region in recorded history. A good deal of that very same culture is alive and well in that area. Nothing succeeds like success. If Chinese citizens are placed at risk there, they are probably going to ask themselves a very simple question. "What would Genghis do?".
Pabst Blue Ribbon - The beer that made Gerlach famous.

User avatar
DVD Burner
Posts: 11031
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:09 am
Burning Since: 1986
Camp Name: White Trash Camp
Contact:

Post by DVD Burner » Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:48 pm

geekster wrote:
We are destroying them with "restraint".


REALLY?


Well I really hope I am not pulling this quote out of context.......with what you are saying and kinda tryin to explain here..........the quote I posted here.......in relating to the context to what you may be saying?

Butt......




I think I have a bunch of links that would/might put this quote into proper context.
While i am thinking about it and will get back to this quote a little bit later because it has a few things I can relate to about it...........


Anyone else notice the similarities between these kinda people?

I mean, ok so this is the BP_ thread and this is about oil and shit but......


I mean.......after all there is this


[youtube][/youtube]




And then there is this:

[youtube][/youtube]


And this:



[youtube][/youtube]




similar to this:[youtube][/youtube]
https://www.facebook.com/NeXTCODER

User avatar
DVD Burner
Posts: 11031
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:09 am
Burning Since: 1986
Camp Name: White Trash Camp
Contact:

Post by DVD Burner » Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:49 pm

Wait a minute, did I just post my opinion again? :shock:
https://www.facebook.com/NeXTCODER

User avatar
DVD Burner
Posts: 11031
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:09 am
Burning Since: 1986
Camp Name: White Trash Camp
Contact:

Post by DVD Burner » Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:01 am

Yep, somebody head me off at the past.

does anyone see where I am going with this?

Better head me off at the past, cause I'm gonna go there.

You know I am.

:?

make sure if you do, you have all facts straight.

And if you make any mistakes just admit it and get on with it so we all know you are not full of shit and have a valid point you can back up.

if I can do it you better be able to do it better than I and consistently do it for all time eplaya is in existence



Move along if you cant.
:twisted: :?


Ok, i should say......


Fine tune as many times as you want and use it to your advantage.

[youtube][/youtube] :P





:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
https://www.facebook.com/NeXTCODER

User avatar
Simon of the Playa
Posts: 22831
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:25 pm
Burning Since: 1996
Camp Name: La Guilde des Hashischins
Location: BRC, Nevada.

Post by Simon of the Playa » Sun Jun 20, 2010 9:04 am

well at least i'll finally be able to get a decent martini in Kandahar now.

ahhh, progress.
Frida Be You & Me

User avatar
geekster
Posts: 4865
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:53 pm
Location: Hospice For The Terminally Breathing
Contact:

Post by geekster » Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:34 pm

REALLY?
Well I really hope I am not pulling this quote out of context.......with what you are saying and kinda tryin to explain here.
Look, we lob a bomb into a place take out 5 civilians here 20 there, 7 somewhere else, after 10 years it adds up. After 10 years of "restraint" we end up killing a lot more civilians than if we had just gone in after the bad guys in the first place.

We end up drawing it out, we enable them to fight longer. So we take great pains to avoid civilian casualties but sometimes some get in the way anyway. Too often we let the bad guys off the hook in order to avoid hurting people. It is my belief that policy like that ends up getting MORE civilians killed in the long run. Just in fewer numbers in each incident but you have more such incidents over a longer period.

It enables the enemy to fight longer and the people pay no price for enabling that behavior by performing such tasks as running ammunition for them.

But having said all of that, what would we give them in its place? A corrupt Karsai administration? That is where we would need a second "prong" of action. The corruption in the government of Afghanistan needs to be eliminated. The problem with that is that what we see as "corruption" is the cultural norm in that and many other places in the world. What we call bribery is the normal course of doing business in that part of the world and has been for a thousand years or more.

It takes THREE GENERATIONS to build a nation. People in Afghanistan do not identify as Afghans. They identify as Pashtuns, Tajiks, Hazeris, Uzbeks, Turkmen, Baluchi, and all sorts of others. They don't even speak a single language as a nation. Most do speak either Dari (in the North) or Pashto (in the South) but there are over 30 languages and dialects there. Third languages such as Naristani and Uzbeki are spoken across fairly large areas.

First, in order to build a cohesive nation, you need a common language and a common culture. Afghanistan should, in my opinion, engage in a massive electronic communications project providing news, educational and entertainment programming by radio across the nation in Dari. There should be content for all ages but in particular the children. What this does is gives children growing up all across the country some common culture. They can all talk about some show they liked to listen to when they were kids, for example, and have common songs and rhymes and such. Many of the various tribal proverbs and stories can be translated into Dari and shared with the rest of the country, too, creating a sort of "melting pot" of culture.

At the same time there needs to be a system of reasonable communications by the creation of a road and rail net that interconnects the country. An analog in the US might be the old US route system of highways and a rail construction program about like that of the mid 18th century here. Afghanistan currently has one railroad under construction and none in operation.

Now, once you have some semblance of a common culture and a communications mechanism, people start moving goods around. Now lets say you want to build a bridge, a dam, a mine, or a road. Bring workers from one region into a different region to work. Get them away from their "tribal elders" and into a different town in a different part of the country. So now you have a generation that is brought up exposed to a common language, common culture, and can move around. Now Pashtuns begin to marry Uzbeks. Tajiks begin to marry Hazeris. The tribal identity begins to fade and the national identity begins to take its place.

The first generation will have a hard go of it because their parents are still of the "old" way and will not approve of many of the things the younger ones are doing. The second generation will have an easier to go of it and that will be where things turn. Only when the third generation comes into the society on its own will the transition be complete and people really consider themselves Afghans.

But you can't have any of that while people are running around blowing shit up. It can cost millions to build a road and it can be destroyed with a few hundred bucks worth of fertilizer. This notion of trying hard to hold the "civilian" population harmless from the acts of the Taliban is just making the problem worse. The Taliban COME from the local population. Until they pay a price for supporting that crap, it will continue forever. So if you go in, tell the population of a town that THEY will be held responsible for what goes on and if it continues, the town will cease to exist, it gives them a very real stake in what goes on. I believe it would have to actually be done in only a very small number of cases, maybe one or two. Once the people realize that this is serious business, they stop tolerating the bullshit.

But then there is the third issue and that is protection of the world heroin supply. If we got too effective at eliminating opium in the area, very powerful politicians around the world who are financed by very powerful global mobsters are going to start agitating to get out in order to protect their supply of opium. Its a mess.

But the bottom line is that until the people actually pay some kind of real tangible price for supporting the Taliban, that isn't going to change. And until some effort is made to produce some sort of national identity things aren't going to change. And doing that is going to take somewhere between 50 and 75 years.

It took 150 years in this country from the time of the House of Burgesses to the Continental Congress. Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were the third generation of his family here. The first generation came over, and their grandchildren were the generation that identified as "American" and not British.

But right now I think it all hinges on corruption. Until we can present them with an alternative to the Taliban that isn't corrupt, we are pissing in the wind. Once we do, the Taliban really have nothing else to offer.
Pabst Blue Ribbon - The beer that made Gerlach famous.

User avatar
geekster
Posts: 4865
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:53 pm
Location: Hospice For The Terminally Breathing
Contact:

Post by geekster » Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:17 pm

And, uhm, whatever happened to this:

http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/i ... 0306.shtml

And that was four years ago.
Pabst Blue Ribbon - The beer that made Gerlach famous.

User avatar
geekster
Posts: 4865
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:53 pm
Location: Hospice For The Terminally Breathing
Contact:

Post by geekster » Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:54 pm

Maybe there is hope:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 03479.html

Just as it was a similar uprising that signaled the end in Iraq, maybe the same will happen in Afghanistan. This is what it takes. It takes people standing up and taking control over their own destiny and not sitting around waiting for "the government" to do it for them.

They kicked out the Taliban, they now have a stake in keeping the place free of them. "The government" didn't kick out the Taliban, the people of the village did.
Pabst Blue Ribbon - The beer that made Gerlach famous.

User avatar
Apollonaris Zeus
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:17 am

Post by Apollonaris Zeus » Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:58 pm

Now we need to get Pakistan from supporting and supplying the the taliban with our cash we can get down to biz and the real reason why we are in Afghan to take their minerals

User avatar
geekster
Posts: 4865
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:53 pm
Location: Hospice For The Terminally Breathing
Contact:

Post by geekster » Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:19 am

Pakistan will be stirring shit in Afghanistan as long as Afghanistan is friendly with India.
Pabst Blue Ribbon - The beer that made Gerlach famous.

Post Reply

Return to “Open Discussion”