Wadsworth Power Project
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
Wadsworth Power Project
http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPACT/ ... /i1443.htm
From today's Federal Register:
Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Paiute Wadsworth Compressor Station, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Site Visit
[Federal Register: June 30, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 125)]
[Notices]
[Page 39460-39462]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30jn04-63]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP04-343-000]
Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Paiute Wadsworth Compressor
Station, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of
Site Visit
June 23, 2004.
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of Paiute Pipeline Company's (Paiute)
proposed Wadsworth Compressor Station Project. Paiute proposes to
abandon operation and use of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) peak-shaving
facility near the town of Lovelock in Pershing County, Nevada and an
associated pipeline, modify existing valve assemblies, and construct
and operate a new compressor station near the town of Wadsworth in
Washoe County, Nevada.\1\ The EA will be used by the Commission in its
decision-making process to determine whether the projects are in the
public convenience and necessity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Paiute's application was filed with the Commission, on May
21, 2004, under sections 7(b) and (c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA)
and part 157 of the Commission's regulations. The Commission issued
a notice of the application on May 28, 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice (NOI) is being sent to affected and adjacent
landowners; Federal, State and local representatives and agencies;
local newspapers and libraries; potentially interested Indian tribes;
public interest and environmental groups; and parties to the
proceeding. Government representatives and agencies are encouraged to
notify their constituents of the proposed projects and encourage them
to comment.
Additionally, with this NOI we \2\ are asking government agencies
and tribes with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues to cooperate with us in the preparation of the EA.
Agencies may choose to participate once they evaluate Paiute's proposal
relative to their responsibilities. Agencies that would like to request
cooperating status should follow the directions for filing comments
described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ ``We'', ``us, and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the FERC's Office of Energy Projects (OEP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are a landowner receiving this NOI, you may be contacted by
a representative of Paiute about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if
the project is approved by the Commission, that approval conveys with
it the right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement negotiations
fail to produce an agreement, the company could initiate condemnation
proceedings in accordance with state law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' should have been
attached to the project notice Paiute is required to provided to
landowners. This fact sheet addresses a number of typically asked
questions, including the use of eminent domain and how to participate
in the Commission's proceedings. It is available for viewing on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov).
Summary of the Proposed Project
Paiute seeks authority to:
• Abandon operation, use, and storage services at the H.G.
Laub LNG facility near Lovelock, in Pershing
[[Page 39461]]
County, Nevada, at about milepost (MP) 164.4 along Paiute's mainline,
which it leases from Public Service Resources Corporation (PSRC);
• Abandon operation and use of 61.1 miles of 20-inch-
diameter pipeline which loops \3\ Paiute's mainline between the
Lovelock LNG plant and Paiute's existing Wadsworth Pressure Limiting
Station. This loop is also leased from PSRC;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A loop is a segment of pipeline installed adjacent to an
existing pipeline and connected to it at both ends. The loop allows
more gas to be moved through the system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Modify existing aboveground valve assembly facilities,
including the:
--Compressor Station 6 Valve Assembly at about MP 164.4 in Pershing
County, Nevada;
--Chimney Rock Valve Assembly at about MP 183.9 in Pershing County,
Nevada;
--Brady Hot Springs Valve Assembly at about MP 199.5 in Churchill
County, Nevada;
--Pyramid Indian Reservation Valve Assembly at about MP 219.4 in Washoe
County, Nevada; and
--Wadsworth Pressure Limiting Station at about MP 225.5 in Washoe
County, Nevada; and
--Construct, own, operate, and maintain a new 3,747 horsepower (hp)
compressor station near Wadsworth, at about MP 224.0 in Washoe County,
Nevada.
From today's Federal Register:
Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Paiute Wadsworth Compressor Station, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Site Visit
[Federal Register: June 30, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 125)]
[Notices]
[Page 39460-39462]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30jn04-63]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP04-343-000]
Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Paiute Wadsworth Compressor
Station, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of
Site Visit
June 23, 2004.
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of Paiute Pipeline Company's (Paiute)
proposed Wadsworth Compressor Station Project. Paiute proposes to
abandon operation and use of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) peak-shaving
facility near the town of Lovelock in Pershing County, Nevada and an
associated pipeline, modify existing valve assemblies, and construct
and operate a new compressor station near the town of Wadsworth in
Washoe County, Nevada.\1\ The EA will be used by the Commission in its
decision-making process to determine whether the projects are in the
public convenience and necessity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Paiute's application was filed with the Commission, on May
21, 2004, under sections 7(b) and (c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA)
and part 157 of the Commission's regulations. The Commission issued
a notice of the application on May 28, 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice (NOI) is being sent to affected and adjacent
landowners; Federal, State and local representatives and agencies;
local newspapers and libraries; potentially interested Indian tribes;
public interest and environmental groups; and parties to the
proceeding. Government representatives and agencies are encouraged to
notify their constituents of the proposed projects and encourage them
to comment.
Additionally, with this NOI we \2\ are asking government agencies
and tribes with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues to cooperate with us in the preparation of the EA.
Agencies may choose to participate once they evaluate Paiute's proposal
relative to their responsibilities. Agencies that would like to request
cooperating status should follow the directions for filing comments
described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ ``We'', ``us, and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the FERC's Office of Energy Projects (OEP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are a landowner receiving this NOI, you may be contacted by
a representative of Paiute about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if
the project is approved by the Commission, that approval conveys with
it the right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement negotiations
fail to produce an agreement, the company could initiate condemnation
proceedings in accordance with state law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' should have been
attached to the project notice Paiute is required to provided to
landowners. This fact sheet addresses a number of typically asked
questions, including the use of eminent domain and how to participate
in the Commission's proceedings. It is available for viewing on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov).
Summary of the Proposed Project
Paiute seeks authority to:
• Abandon operation, use, and storage services at the H.G.
Laub LNG facility near Lovelock, in Pershing
[[Page 39461]]
County, Nevada, at about milepost (MP) 164.4 along Paiute's mainline,
which it leases from Public Service Resources Corporation (PSRC);
• Abandon operation and use of 61.1 miles of 20-inch-
diameter pipeline which loops \3\ Paiute's mainline between the
Lovelock LNG plant and Paiute's existing Wadsworth Pressure Limiting
Station. This loop is also leased from PSRC;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A loop is a segment of pipeline installed adjacent to an
existing pipeline and connected to it at both ends. The loop allows
more gas to be moved through the system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Modify existing aboveground valve assembly facilities,
including the:
--Compressor Station 6 Valve Assembly at about MP 164.4 in Pershing
County, Nevada;
--Chimney Rock Valve Assembly at about MP 183.9 in Pershing County,
Nevada;
--Brady Hot Springs Valve Assembly at about MP 199.5 in Churchill
County, Nevada;
--Pyramid Indian Reservation Valve Assembly at about MP 219.4 in Washoe
County, Nevada; and
--Wadsworth Pressure Limiting Station at about MP 225.5 in Washoe
County, Nevada; and
--Construct, own, operate, and maintain a new 3,747 horsepower (hp)
compressor station near Wadsworth, at about MP 224.0 in Washoe County,
Nevada.
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
Wadsworth Power II
Paiute has proposed two options for the abandonment of the
facilities leased from PSRC. One option would be to leave the
facilities in an inactive state, with all natural gas purged from the
LNG plant and loop. The loop would be cut and capped, and the
connections between the loop and Paiute's mainline would be removed at
four valve assembly sites. The second option would be to leave the
leased facilities in an active state, with PSRC taking over operation
of the LNG plant and loop. In this case, Paiute would need to install
inlet and outlet piping at the LNG plant, Compressor Station 6 Valve
Assembly, and at the Wadsworth Pressure Limiting Station. PSRC would
need to install custody metering and pressure limiting facilities at
the same locations, plus odorization facilities at the LNG plant.
Paiute's proposed new Wadsworth Compressor Station would add 27,154
dekatherms per day, or 26.7 million cubic feet per day, to the capacity
of its mainline system, making up the deficit lost by abandonment of
the LNG facility and loop. Paiute's lease of the LNG plant and
associated loop terminates in July 2005. Paiute would like to have the
proposed facilities constructed and in service prior to the winter of
2005-2006.
Paiute's proposed Wadsworth Compressor Station would be located on
privately owned land. However, Paiute's existing Compressor Station 6,
Chimney Rock, and Brady Hot Spring Valve Assemblies are on land
administered by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), while its
existing Pyramid Lake Indian Reservation Valve Assembly is within the
Pyramid Lake Indian Reservation. The general location of the project
facilities is shown in appendix 1.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all appendices, other
than appendix 1 (maps), are available on the Commission's website at
the ``eLibrary'' link or from the Commission's Public Reference and
Files Maintenance Branch, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, or call (202) 502-8371. For instructions on connecting to
eLibrary refer to the last page of this notice. Copies of the
appendices were sent to all those receiving this notice in the mail.
Requests for detailed maps of the proposed facilities should be made
directly to Paiute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Requirements for Construction
Construction of the proposed facilities would affect a total of
about 12.2 acres. Operation of the facilities would require about 1.3
acres total. Construction of Paiute's Wadsworth Compressor Station
would affect about 11.7 acres, of which 1.3 acres would be needed for
operation of the facility. Most of the modifications at Paiute's
existing aboveground valve assemblies would be done within the existing
fenced permanent right-of-way. However, modifications at three existing
Paiute facilities may affect about 0.5 acre total temporarily during
construction. The land temporarily impacted during construction of
these facilities would afterwards be restored to its previous condition
and use.
The Scoping Process
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals.
This process is referred to as ``scoping.'' The main goal of the
scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the important
environmental issues. By this NOI, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All
comments received are considered during the preparation of the EA. To
ensure your comments are considered, please carefully follow the
instructions in the public participation section of this NOI.
Our independent analysis of environmental issues will be in the EA.
Depending on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA
may be published and mailed to Federal, State, and local agencies,
affected and adjacent landowners, environmental and public interest
groups, interested individuals and Indian tribes, local newspapers and
libraries, and the Commission's official service list for this
proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA is
published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we make our
recommendations to the Commission.
Currently Identified Environmental Issues
We have already identified several issues that we think deserve
attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and
the environmental information provided by Paiute. This preliminary list
of issues may be changed based on your comments and our analysis.
• Geology and Soils:
--Seismic hazards related to the location of facilities in areas of
high earthquake potential.
• Water Resources and Wetlands:
--Assessment of impacts on any streams and wetlands.
• Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation:
--Permanent clearing of vegetation for operation of new aboveground
facilities.
--Potential effects on the bald eagle, a federally-listed threatened
species.
• Cultural Resources:
--Avoidance of archaeological sites which may potentially qualify for
the National Register of Historic Places.
--Native American and tribal concerns.
• Land Use, Recreation and Special Interest Areas, and
Visual Resources:
--Assessment of land use and visual compatibility of the proposed
facilities with Federal and tribal land owners, including the BLM and
the Pyramid Lake Indian Reservation.
• Air and Noise Quality:
--Effects on local air quality and noise environment from construction
and operation of proposed facilities.
• Reliability and Safety:
--Assessment of hazards associated with the abandonment of the Lovelock
LNG plant.
• Alternatives:
--Assessment of the no action alternative, system alternatives, and
alternative facility locations.
[[Page 39462]]
facilities leased from PSRC. One option would be to leave the
facilities in an inactive state, with all natural gas purged from the
LNG plant and loop. The loop would be cut and capped, and the
connections between the loop and Paiute's mainline would be removed at
four valve assembly sites. The second option would be to leave the
leased facilities in an active state, with PSRC taking over operation
of the LNG plant and loop. In this case, Paiute would need to install
inlet and outlet piping at the LNG plant, Compressor Station 6 Valve
Assembly, and at the Wadsworth Pressure Limiting Station. PSRC would
need to install custody metering and pressure limiting facilities at
the same locations, plus odorization facilities at the LNG plant.
Paiute's proposed new Wadsworth Compressor Station would add 27,154
dekatherms per day, or 26.7 million cubic feet per day, to the capacity
of its mainline system, making up the deficit lost by abandonment of
the LNG facility and loop. Paiute's lease of the LNG plant and
associated loop terminates in July 2005. Paiute would like to have the
proposed facilities constructed and in service prior to the winter of
2005-2006.
Paiute's proposed Wadsworth Compressor Station would be located on
privately owned land. However, Paiute's existing Compressor Station 6,
Chimney Rock, and Brady Hot Spring Valve Assemblies are on land
administered by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), while its
existing Pyramid Lake Indian Reservation Valve Assembly is within the
Pyramid Lake Indian Reservation. The general location of the project
facilities is shown in appendix 1.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all appendices, other
than appendix 1 (maps), are available on the Commission's website at
the ``eLibrary'' link or from the Commission's Public Reference and
Files Maintenance Branch, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, or call (202) 502-8371. For instructions on connecting to
eLibrary refer to the last page of this notice. Copies of the
appendices were sent to all those receiving this notice in the mail.
Requests for detailed maps of the proposed facilities should be made
directly to Paiute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Requirements for Construction
Construction of the proposed facilities would affect a total of
about 12.2 acres. Operation of the facilities would require about 1.3
acres total. Construction of Paiute's Wadsworth Compressor Station
would affect about 11.7 acres, of which 1.3 acres would be needed for
operation of the facility. Most of the modifications at Paiute's
existing aboveground valve assemblies would be done within the existing
fenced permanent right-of-way. However, modifications at three existing
Paiute facilities may affect about 0.5 acre total temporarily during
construction. The land temporarily impacted during construction of
these facilities would afterwards be restored to its previous condition
and use.
The Scoping Process
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals.
This process is referred to as ``scoping.'' The main goal of the
scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the important
environmental issues. By this NOI, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All
comments received are considered during the preparation of the EA. To
ensure your comments are considered, please carefully follow the
instructions in the public participation section of this NOI.
Our independent analysis of environmental issues will be in the EA.
Depending on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA
may be published and mailed to Federal, State, and local agencies,
affected and adjacent landowners, environmental and public interest
groups, interested individuals and Indian tribes, local newspapers and
libraries, and the Commission's official service list for this
proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA is
published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we make our
recommendations to the Commission.
Currently Identified Environmental Issues
We have already identified several issues that we think deserve
attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and
the environmental information provided by Paiute. This preliminary list
of issues may be changed based on your comments and our analysis.
• Geology and Soils:
--Seismic hazards related to the location of facilities in areas of
high earthquake potential.
• Water Resources and Wetlands:
--Assessment of impacts on any streams and wetlands.
• Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation:
--Permanent clearing of vegetation for operation of new aboveground
facilities.
--Potential effects on the bald eagle, a federally-listed threatened
species.
• Cultural Resources:
--Avoidance of archaeological sites which may potentially qualify for
the National Register of Historic Places.
--Native American and tribal concerns.
• Land Use, Recreation and Special Interest Areas, and
Visual Resources:
--Assessment of land use and visual compatibility of the proposed
facilities with Federal and tribal land owners, including the BLM and
the Pyramid Lake Indian Reservation.
• Air and Noise Quality:
--Effects on local air quality and noise environment from construction
and operation of proposed facilities.
• Reliability and Safety:
--Assessment of hazards associated with the abandonment of the Lovelock
LNG plant.
• Alternatives:
--Assessment of the no action alternative, system alternatives, and
alternative facility locations.
[[Page 39462]]
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
Power Plant III
Public Participation
You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the project. By becoming a commentor, your
concerns will be addressed in the EA and considered by the Commission.
You should focus on the potential environmental effects of the
proposal, alternatives to the proposal (including alternative facility
locations), and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impact. The
more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. Please
carefully follow these instructions to ensure that your comments are
received in time and properly recorded:
• Send an original and two copies of your letter to: Magalie
R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
St., NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426;
• Label one copy of the comments for the attention of Gas Branch 3;
• Reference Docket No. CP04-343-000; and
• Mail your comments so that they will be received in
Washington, DC on or before July 30, 2004.
Please note that we are continuing to experience delays in mail
deliveries from the U.S. Postal Service. As a result, we will include
all comments that we receive within a reasonable time frame in our
environmental analysis of this project. However, the Commission
strongly encourages electronic filing of any comments or interventions
or protests to this proceeding. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
under the ``e-Filing'' link and the link to the User's Guide. Before you
can file comments you will need to create a free account which can be
created on-line.
If you do not want to send comments at this time but still want to
remain on our environmental mailing list, please return the Information
Request (appendix 3). If you do not return the Information Request, you
will be taken off the mailing list.
Site Visit
We will also be conducting a site visit to the proposed location of
Paiute's Wadsworth Compressor Station, on Monday, July 12, 2004. Anyone
interested in participating in the site visit should meet at the
parking lot for the Best Western Airport Plaza, 1981 Terminal Way,
Reno, Nevada 89502, at 12 p.m. (noon) on July 12, 2004. Participants
must provide their own transportation. For additional information,
please contact the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (202)
502-8004.
Becoming an Intervenor
In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want
to become an official party to the proceeding known as an
``intervenor.'' Intervenors play a more formal role in the process.
Among other things, intervenors have the right to receive copies of
case-related Commission documents and filings by other intervenors.
Likewise, each intervenor must provide 14 copies of its filings to the
Secretary of the Commission and must send a copy of its filings to all
other parties on the Commission's service list for this proceeding. If
you want to become an intervenor you must file a motion to intervene
according to rule 214 of the Commission's rules of practice and
procedure (18 CFR 385.214) (see appendix 2).\5\ Only intervenors have
the right to seek rehearing of the Commission's decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Interventions may also be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper. See the previous discussion on filing
comments electronically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Affected landowners and parties with environmental concerns may be
granted intervenor status upon showing good cause by stating that they
have a clear and direct interest in this proceeding which would not be
adequately represented by any other parties. You do not need intervenor
status to have your environmental comments considered.
Additional Information
Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at 1-866-208-FERC or on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link.
Click on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number
field. Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected] or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502-8659.
In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.
Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/
EventsList.aspx along with other related information.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4-1443 Filed 6-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the project. By becoming a commentor, your
concerns will be addressed in the EA and considered by the Commission.
You should focus on the potential environmental effects of the
proposal, alternatives to the proposal (including alternative facility
locations), and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impact. The
more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. Please
carefully follow these instructions to ensure that your comments are
received in time and properly recorded:
• Send an original and two copies of your letter to: Magalie
R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
St., NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426;
• Label one copy of the comments for the attention of Gas Branch 3;
• Reference Docket No. CP04-343-000; and
• Mail your comments so that they will be received in
Washington, DC on or before July 30, 2004.
Please note that we are continuing to experience delays in mail
deliveries from the U.S. Postal Service. As a result, we will include
all comments that we receive within a reasonable time frame in our
environmental analysis of this project. However, the Commission
strongly encourages electronic filing of any comments or interventions
or protests to this proceeding. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
under the ``e-Filing'' link and the link to the User's Guide. Before you
can file comments you will need to create a free account which can be
created on-line.
If you do not want to send comments at this time but still want to
remain on our environmental mailing list, please return the Information
Request (appendix 3). If you do not return the Information Request, you
will be taken off the mailing list.
Site Visit
We will also be conducting a site visit to the proposed location of
Paiute's Wadsworth Compressor Station, on Monday, July 12, 2004. Anyone
interested in participating in the site visit should meet at the
parking lot for the Best Western Airport Plaza, 1981 Terminal Way,
Reno, Nevada 89502, at 12 p.m. (noon) on July 12, 2004. Participants
must provide their own transportation. For additional information,
please contact the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (202)
502-8004.
Becoming an Intervenor
In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want
to become an official party to the proceeding known as an
``intervenor.'' Intervenors play a more formal role in the process.
Among other things, intervenors have the right to receive copies of
case-related Commission documents and filings by other intervenors.
Likewise, each intervenor must provide 14 copies of its filings to the
Secretary of the Commission and must send a copy of its filings to all
other parties on the Commission's service list for this proceeding. If
you want to become an intervenor you must file a motion to intervene
according to rule 214 of the Commission's rules of practice and
procedure (18 CFR 385.214) (see appendix 2).\5\ Only intervenors have
the right to seek rehearing of the Commission's decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Interventions may also be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper. See the previous discussion on filing
comments electronically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Affected landowners and parties with environmental concerns may be
granted intervenor status upon showing good cause by stating that they
have a clear and direct interest in this proceeding which would not be
adequately represented by any other parties. You do not need intervenor
status to have your environmental comments considered.
Additional Information
Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at 1-866-208-FERC or on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link.
Click on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number
field. Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected] or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502-8659.
In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.
Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/
EventsList.aspx along with other related information.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4-1443 Filed 6-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
- Apollonaris Zeus
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:17 am
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
Darned if I know. (Seriously, I can't read these things so well that I really know what's going on.)
It's certainly near (as space is counted in the west.) There has been a certain amount of discussion about the Sempra plant in particular and power plants in general that I'm just doing it on semi-automatic pilot. Basically, it's potentially useful information that everyone can ignore or use as they individually see fit.
It's certainly near (as space is counted in the west.) There has been a certain amount of discussion about the Sempra plant in particular and power plants in general that I'm just doing it on semi-automatic pilot. Basically, it's potentially useful information that everyone can ignore or use as they individually see fit.
-
Simply Joel
- Posts: 3483
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:08 am
- Location: Land of Lincoln
- Contact:
It is written in english.
Don't you read and write in english?
DVD... this excludes you by your own admission.
What is means is the EPA process has begun...
does anyone have any objections, if so, the process is printed above.
Don't you read and write in english?
DVD... this excludes you by your own admission.
What is means is the EPA process has begun...
does anyone have any objections, if so, the process is printed above.
Democrats... snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, daily!
slap my salmon, baby
slap my salmon, baby
- Apollonaris Zeus
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:17 am
I see. You have a case of internet sensory serotonin disfunctionality overload syndrome!theCryptofishist wrote: I'm just doing it on semi-automatic pilot.
my prescription will cure that:
Take you burning man before you go to sleep in the morning and perform oral sex with the first two people you meet in the morning. sexual gender dependant on your preference!
If that doesn't work then go to Nevada and pay the most money for least amount of sex you can find and then you can worry about that for a week or two.
A II Z
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
My experience of NEPA documents it that they are written in three sub-dialects of English all at once: legalese, scientific jargon, and beaureaucratese. I can't tell if this NOI means that some junky power plant is about to be replaced with something cleaner or if the new plant will have so much more capacity that it will spew out more garbage particles for instance. YMMVSimply Joel wrote:It is written in english.
Don't you read and write in english?
- Apollonaris Zeus
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:17 am
Yes, but the synopsis is what I want!theCryptofishist wrote:My experience of NEPA documents it that they are written in three sub-dialects of English all at once: legalese, scientific jargon, and beaureaucratese. I can't tell if this NOI means that some junky power plant is about to be replaced with something cleaner or if the new plant will have so much more capacity that it will spew out more garbage particles for instance. YMMVSimply Joel wrote:It is written in english.
Don't you read and write in english?
A II Z
- cowboyangel
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 10:32 pm
- Apollonaris Zeus
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:17 am
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
More on the Wadsworth Power project
http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPACT/ ... /i1437.htm
Again, I'm not quite sure what all this means (and I cut it short, because much of the language is "boiler plate" repeatician of what was in the earlier notice. Make sure that you have the correct information if you are commenting.) I can say this. I--The original DEIS on this power plant was given a rating of "Environmental Concerns-2: Insufficient Information" in 1995 by the EPA. I don't know if they made sufficient corrections for the actual building of the plant. II--Sometimes, multiple Environmental Assesments for interrelated projects are attempts by the filing agency to break a larger project into smaller pieces and limit scrutiny by the public and the EPA. Othertimes it is legitemate.the Federal Register wrote:Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Tuscarora 2005 Expansion Project, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Site Visit
[Federal Register: July 2, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 127)]
[Notices]
[Page 40366-40368]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jy04-49]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP04-344-000]
Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare
an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Tuscarora 2005 Expansion
Project, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of
Site Visit
June 22, 2004.
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of Tuscarora Gas Transmission
Company's (Tuscarora) proposed 2005 Expansion Project. Tuscarora
proposes to install and operate a new compressor unit at its existing
Wadsworth Booster Station in Washoe County, Nevada, and construct and
operate a new compressor station near the town of Likely in Modoc
County, California.\1\ The EA will be used by the Commission in its
decision-making process to determine whether the projects are in the
public convenience and necessity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Tuscarora's application was filed on May 21, 2004, under
section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and part 157 of the
Commission's regulations. The Commission issued a notice of the
application on May 28, 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice (NOI) is being sent to affected and adjacent
landowners; Federal, State and local representatives and agencies;
local newspapers and libraries; potentially interested Indian tribes;
public interest and environmental groups; and parties to the
proceeding. Government representatives and agencies are encouraged to
notify their constituents of the proposed projects and encourage them
to comment.
Additionally, with this NOI we \2\ are asking government agencies
and tribes with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues to cooperate with us in the preparation of the EA.
Agencies may choose to participate once they evaluate Tuscarora's
proposal relative to their responsibilities. Agencies that would like
to request cooperating status should follow the directions for filing
comments described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ ''We'', ``us'', and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the FERC's Office of Energy Projects (OEP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are a landowner receiving this NOI, you may be contacted by
a representative of Tuscarora about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if
the project is approved by the Commission, that approval conveys with
it the right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement negotiations
fail to produce an agreement, the company could initiate condemnation
proceedings in accordance with State law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' should have been
attached to the project notice Tuscarora is required to provided to
landowners. This fact sheet addresses a number of typically asked
questions, including the use of eminent domain and how to participate
in the Commission's proceedings. It is available for viewing on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov).
Summary of the Proposed Project
Tuscarora seeks authority to:
• Construct, install, own, operate and maintain a new 3,600
hp unit at its existing Wadsworth Booster Station at about MP 10.6
along Tuscarora's Wadsworth lateral, near its interconnection with
Paiute's mainline, in Washoe County, Nevada; and
• Construct, install, own, operate, and maintain a new 8,000
hp compressor station at about MP 81.6 along Tuscarora's mainline near
Likely in Modoc County, California.
The facilities proposed by Tuscarora would add up to 51,753
dekatherms per day (Dth/d) in firm transportation capacity to its
system. This additional capacity is contracted to Southwest Gas
[[Page 40367]]
Corporation (Paiute's parent company), Sierra Pacific Power Company (a
part owner of Tuscarora), and Avista Corporation. Tuscarora would like
to have the proposed facilities constructed and in service prior to the
winter of 2005-2006.
Tuscarora's Wadsworth Booster Station and Likely Compressor Station
are located on privately owned lands. However, an existing access road
to Tuscarora's Wadsworth Booster Station crosses lands owned by the
U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Pyramid Lake Indian
Reservation. The general location of the project facilities is shown in
appendix 1.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all appendices, other
than appendix 1 (maps), are available on the Commission's Web site
at the ``eLibrary'' link or from the Commission's Public Reference,
Room, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, or call (202)
502-8371. For instructions on connecting to eLibrary refer to the
last page of this notice. Copies of the appendices were sent to all
those receiving this notice in the mail. Requests for detailed maps
of the proposed facilities should be made directly to Tuscarora.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Requirements for Construction
Construction of the proposed facilities would affect a total of
about 12 acres. Operation of the facilities would require about 3.8
acres total. About 2.5 acres would be used during construction of
Tuscarora's new unit at the Wadsworth Booster Station, of which about
0.5 acre would be required for operation of the facility. Construction
of Tuscarora's new Likely Compressor Station would affect about 9.0
acres, of which 3.3 acres would be used during operation of the
facility. The land temporarily impacted during construction of these
facilities would afterwards be restored to its previous condition and use.
<snip>