And then there is Burning Man!technopatra wrote:
Yes, I mean according to our social mores, which I hope to heaven are not going away anytime soon. Boundaries are the landmark of civilized cultures, and some of them should not ever be crossed.
The separation of the technical part of sex and the emotional part is tanatmount to the overall knowledge and pleasure of sex and love.
I wouldn't want to too, nor have my child, marry or fall in love with my first just because she or he was the first or the first one good at sex. There are other criteriors that must met before love is to happen, but to be satisfied in bed will keep more relationships together longer then just bad sex and being loved.
Robert Heinlein saw a world that was perfect to him and he wrote about it in his books. if you read his books he was truely in love with his mother- ie "The man that lived forever". That was his perfect world.
I don't believe in having a relative be your sex guide, but I don't believe that people that have an older mentor teach them about sex- if they truely are proficient in sex are wrong or bad for doing so, in fact I think that to be very advance.
I am amazed at how many women I have been intimate with, say that they never had sex like that before and I don't think for a second that I am the sex Messiah. Its just that they have had such bad sex parners.
After I had instructed the preliminaries about sex and love, I would have a sex ed teacher teacher instruct my child about the ins and outs (no joke) of sex and relationships then provide a professional or mentor for them to work out the details in the actual performance of sex. This would cause less confusion and/or rejection at an early developemental stage that could cause serious phychological harm or perhap turn them into sexually violent people.
Sex ed in school is bullshit and may cause more harm then good!
A II Z