Every single one of my cameras has been to the desert - Black Rock and a number of others. I take them out to take photos. They aren't jewelery, or fine china. They're tools.
The D700 and D3 have been out there 3 years in a row with no cleaning or other attention besides a wipe down.
I've also taken my 4x5 press camera, random polaroids, etc. Never had a problem.
I've had more equipment broken while on the job covering stories surrounded by hundreds of elbow-wielding news guys.
Playa proof SLR housing?
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 3:02 pm
- chris2010
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:55 pm
- Burning Since: 2010
- Location: Citrus Springs, Florida
- Contact:
Before Burning Man 2010 I had been debating bring my Expensive camera & lenses because of the Playa dust and the chances of loosing things out on the Playa. I wound up getting a Canon PowerShot D10 which is a 12MP waterproof camera. It did a good job on the Playa for my still, but it was limited to 3X zoom. It had a great strapping system which made it easy to attach to my backpack (or other things). For my HD Videos I got a Sanyo Xaci VPC-CA9 which is also a Waterproof camera. Both are great camera, but since I got them there have been a lot of new waterproof cameras which shoot great Still and Video in HD.
~Chris~
2010, 2011)°(2013?
2010, 2011)°(2013?
- Irreverent Moniker
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:01 am
- Location: Sacramento
I didn't worry about my camera last year, but I took an older D60 that I didn't really care about it. It didn't get damaged or even all that dirty.
I'm planning on taking a better camera this year, with my much more expensive 18-200 VR, so I'm a bit more worried. I might pick up one of those Aquapac waterproof bags just in case.
I'm planning on taking a better camera this year, with my much more expensive 18-200 VR, so I'm a bit more worried. I might pick up one of those Aquapac waterproof bags just in case.
Walk tall, kick ass, learn to speak Arabic, love music and never forget you come from a long line of truth seekers, lovers and warriors.
- CapSmashy
- Posts: 1917
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:29 pm
- Burning Since: 2007
- Camp Name: Terminal City://404 Village Not Found
- Location: Awesome Camp 2.0
My 18-200 has been on the Playa every year since 07 and hasn't had an issue.Irreverent Moniker wrote:I didn't worry about my camera last year, but I took an older D60 that I didn't really care about it. It didn't get damaged or even all that dirty.
I'm planning on taking a better camera this year, with my much more expensive 18-200 VR, so I'm a bit more worried. I might pick up one of those Aquapac waterproof bags just in case.
- CapSmashy
- Posts: 1917
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:29 pm
- Burning Since: 2007
- Camp Name: Terminal City://404 Village Not Found
- Location: Awesome Camp 2.0
Ummm... not really true and a pretty bad analogy to boot.Super Evil Brian wrote:Megapixel count means nothing. It's like horsepower in cars or wattage in an amplifier. The first few years of digital SLRs was pretty rough, but the last year was pretty good, if one has the money. I don't recall a 3MP digital from Nikon.
mp comes into play in terms of making clean enlargements. A 3mp image with a 50% crop blown up to 11x17 will look like absolute dog piss in a frame. Unless of course you were going for blocky abstract.
And there is a very big difference between a 270 horsepower 02 T/A and a 600 hp 02 T/A.
The D1 was pretty awesome for its time, but is pretty much obsolete junk today compared to even the low end DSLR's of today.Older digital cameras also had a bad problem blowing out highlights, which is a serious problem in a bright and high-key environment.
- Playa Status
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:56 pm
- CapSmashy
- Posts: 1917
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:29 pm
- Burning Since: 2007
- Camp Name: Terminal City://404 Village Not Found
- Location: Awesome Camp 2.0