The photo policy needs work

Share your views on the policies, philosophies, and spirit of Burning Man.
User avatar
capjbadger
Posts: 2692
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:17 am
Burning Since: 2005
Camp Name: Lamplighters
Location: Horus' Left Armpit

Postby capjbadger » Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:58 pm

Fishy is correct. During the rental time, there is an exclusion zone that is not public land for that time period.

-Badger
Arrrggg!! Avast ye fucking fluffy bunny shirtcockers! Haul your drunken hairy fat ass out of our sight or prepare to receive a hot buttered hedgehog fired up your aft quarters!

Honey Badger don't care. Honey Badger don't give a shit!

User avatar
Bob
Posts: 6762
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 10:00 am
Burning Since: 1986
Camp Name: Royaneh
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Postby Bob » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:43 am

Speaking strictly, the BLM requires permits for commercial photography anywhere on its lands.
Amazing desert structures & stuff: http://sites.google.com/site/potatotrap/

"Let us say I suggest you may be human." -- Reverend Mother Gaius Helen Mohiam

User avatar
some seeing eye
Posts: 2173
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:06 pm
Burning Since: 1999
Camp Name: Woo
Location: The Oregon

Postby some seeing eye » Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:19 am

Speaking strictly, the BLM requires permits for commercial photography anywhere on its lands.


Thanks Bob, I didn't know that. Weird though. I wonder which is cheaper, a mining claim where photography is reasonably necessary, or a photography permit? The BM ticket or a photography permit?


Return to “Philosophical Center”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests