Radiation

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:07 pm

Apparently, California got a good dose of the fallout from Japan,,, worse than many areas in Japan.

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/08/map- ... cross.html

Isotopia · Post by **Isotopia** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:18 pm

Once again your level of idiocy is off the fucking scale.

Instead, why not go get yourself a can of gasoline, pour it on yourself (thoroughly) and hope that someone, feeling sorry for your stupid ass, tosses - with all compassion - a lit cigarette on you.

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:34 pm

My, how typical,,, stupidity. A lit cigarette won't ignite gasoline. Fact and honesty is a moving-target for you. You rarely consider it or hit it. Waste of keystrokes.

Simon of the Playa · Post by **Simon of the Playa** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:55 am

you are the waste of keystrokes, mr. "I've been sitting around posting propaganda for the tea-party instead of participating in Burning Man"...

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 6:24 pm

"World Health Organisation's International Agency for Research on Cancer issued a statement saying radiofrequency radiation was "possibly carcinogenic", classifying mobile phones as a category 2B carcinogen, similar to the pesticide DDT and engine exhaust."

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/techno ... z1XE3AiF9b

can't sit still · Post by **can't sit still** » Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:22 am

it seems that there is an awful lot of Plutonium around Fukushima.
http://enenews.com/strontium-found-80-k ... misoma-map
It's a debatable question if the MOX reactors even had that much plutonium. There is an alternative explanation offered. Impossible to know the truth.
http://www.rense.com/general94/secbb.htm

Isotopia · Post by **Isotopia** » Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:36 pm

The bias of your enews source goes beyond the pale. It's nothing more than a sounding board for anti-nuclear zealots and paranoid conspiracists.

Once again your disingenuous claims of seeking truth without bias reveal you to be fraudulant jackass seemingly incapable of objective, fact-based reportage.

Major Krash · Post by **Major Krash** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:14 pm

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/ ... l.pdf+html

doesn't look incredibly cheery...

gyre · Post by **gyre** » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:57 pm

We had a truck accident recently involving uranium fuel rods enroute to a reactor.

NRC says radioactive material comes through here daily.

Ugly Dougly · Post by **Ugly Dougly** » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:41 am

Isotopia wrote:The bias of your enews source goes beyond the pale. It's nothing more than a sounding board for anti-nuclear zealots and paranoid conspiracists.

Once again your disingenuous claims of seeking truth without bias reveal you to be fraudulant jackass seemingly incapable of objective, fact-based reportage.

You don't read science-fiction, then?

Isotopia · Post by **Isotopia** » Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:33 pm

Actually I do. I'm just able to differentiate fiction from the truth unlike some who post here.

Radiation

Re: Radiation

Re: Radiation

Re: Radiation

Re: Radiation

Re: Radiation

Re: Radiation

Re: Radiation

Re: Radiation

Re: Radiation

Re: Radiation

Re: Radiation