new camp new rules, any takers?

koreankitty · Post by **koreankitty** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:58 pm

this will be my third year at burning man. i'm finally doing it. i'm starting my own camp with friends and looking to expand and share the wealth, knowledge and love for all. we're two asian hotties based in the bay area. we are NOT sparkle ponies! we work hard, and play harder. we have many talents. our theme is created from 2 strong women who promote the freedom of sexuality, no please don't be prude because we aren't. we love to dance, laugh, create art and memories. we have an RV this year and looking to share it with you as well. We are looking to keep our camp female friendly so please message us for details. Please be local since we have many upcoming projects and fundraisers that we would like you to be a part of.

Post by **trilobyte** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:05 pm

Congrats on starting your own camp!

Roberto Dobbisano · Post by **Roberto Dobbisano** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 7:50 am

"LIP MY STOCKINGS!"

theCryptofishist · Post by **theCryptofishist** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:54 am

1 If you want people to be "local" maybe you should say where you are.
2 Saying you're "hotties" and that you're looking to share an RV might lead to some unwanted conclusions.

Kontradiction · Post by **Kontradiction** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:34 am

Er, welcome and good luck!

Post by **Elderberry** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:39 pm

theCryptofishist wrote:1 If you want people to be "local" maybe you should say where you are.
2 Saying you're "hotties" and that you're looking to share an RV might lead to some unwanted conclusions.

Doesn't "bay area" cover that? But regardless, not much in that post really sells the concept, let alone explains what that concept might be. I can see most of the applicants being young, horney guys.

Nipple · Post by **Nipple** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:58 pm

Uh, some of us are middle-aged horny guys, thank you.

Post by **Elderberry** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:51 pm

LOL, yes but we're all young at heart!

Ugly Dougly · Post by **Ugly Dougly** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:59 pm

Waiting for the provocative poster to return.

theCryptofishist · Post by **theCryptofishist** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:31 pm

jkisha wrote:
theCryptofishist wrote:1 If you want people to be "local" maybe you should say where you are.
2 Saying you're "hotties" and that you're looking to share an RV might lead to some unwanted conclusions.
Doesn't "bay area" cover that?

D'oh!

Post by **Elderberry** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:35 pm

Ugly Dougly wrote:Waiting for the provocative poster to return.

One post wonder?

Nipple · Post by **Nipple** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:40 pm

Her and "Big Sexxy".

oneeyeddick · Post by **oneeyeddick** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 6:06 pm

When she says that she wants to keep the camp "female friendly' does that mean that no shirt cockers are allowed?

MyDearFriend · Post by **MyDearFriend** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 7:12 pm

jkisha wrote:
theCryptofishist wrote: If you want people to be "local" maybe you should say where you are.
Doesn't "bay area" cover that?

Only if you live in California.

Y'all are not quite at the center of the universe, you know.

OED: I would never presume that shirt-cockers were unfriendly to females.

oneeyeddick · Post by **oneeyeddick** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:02 pm

"female friendly" is hippyspeak for lesbian.

theCryptofishist · Post by **theCryptofishist** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:05 pm

What's lesbian speak for hippie?

oneeyeddick · Post by **oneeyeddick** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:08 pm

Dustmop, or swiffer if they are from the Bay area..

Post by **Elderberry** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:16 pm

oneeyeddick wrote:"female friendly" is hippyspeak for lesbian.

Where did you learn to speak lesbian?

oneeyeddick · Post by **oneeyeddick** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:23 pm

1st, 3rd, and 6th grade.

Kontradiction · Post by **Kontradiction** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:49 pm

Thought she said she was from the "Bare area"...hunh...

lemur · Post by **lemur** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:41 pm

koreankitty wrote:we're two asian hotties based in the bay area. .., no please don't be prude because we aren't.

i want to see photographs of "two asian hotties"

edit:
without clothes on

MyDearFriend · Post by **MyDearFriend** » Thu Oct 20, 2011 4:45 am

lemur wrote:
koreankitty wrote:we're two asian hotties based in the bay area. .., no please don't be prude because we aren't.

i want to see photographs of "two asian hotties"

edit:
without clothes on

Me too, but, I don't think she's coming back.

BTW, does "Bay Area" = suburbs of some specific city? or what? Seriously I don't speak Californian.

oneeyeddick · Post by **oneeyeddick** » Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:27 am

The entire western US knows the "bay area" to be San Francisco, and yes that includes Montana.

Drawingablank · Post by **Drawingablank** » Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:22 am

I've always taken bay area to be the San Francisco Bay Area including the surrounding towns - Oakland, Berkley, etc... Sort of like saying The San Francisco Metro Area.

Wow, just noticed the new sig OED - I am flattered that you liked it enough to use that line as a sig.

Ugly Dougly · Post by **Ugly Dougly** » Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:25 am

jkisha wrote:
Ugly Dougly wrote:Waiting for the provocative poster to return.
One post wonder?

That's a very charitable way of saying it, I suppose.
"She" really got you going didn't she? Now whose sock was that?

Post by **Elderberry** » Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:06 am

Ugly Dougly wrote:
jkisha wrote:
Ugly Dougly wrote:Waiting for the provocative poster to return.
One post wonder?
That's a very charitable way of saying it, I suppose.
"She" really got you going didn't she? Now whose sock was that?

I HATE that people are allowed to have socks on this board. If I ruled the world, that would be grounds for immediate banning from the board. I can't think of anything that speaks to someone's character more loudly than the fact that they have to hide behind a sock. (and NO, IT'S NOT ART!)

Just_Joe · Post by **Just_Joe** » Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:11 am

MyDearFriend wrote: BTW, does "Bay Area" = suburbs of some specific city? or what? Seriously I don't speak Californian.

Good question.
"Bay Area" refers to the area surrounding The City.

H.G.Crosby · Post by **H.G.Crosby** » Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:15 am

just a tad bit paranoid, aren't we kisha?

does this mean every questionable post now immediately comes from a sock?

i feel you are very anti-hosiery and quite bigoted towards argyle in particular.

shame on you.

kingsoon · Post by **kingsoon** » Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:42 am

H.G.Crosby wrote:just a tad bit paranoid, aren't we kisha?

does this mean every questionable post now immediately comes from a sock?

i feel you are very anti-hosiery and quite bigoted towards argyle in particular.

shame on you.

I am agreeing on you master Crosby

Post by **Elderberry** » Thu Oct 20, 2011 1:08 pm

LOL it's not as egregious when the socks are all hung on the line for all to see who owns them. I'm usually too naive to appreciate the questionability of a post's owner right off. I was actually surprised to learn that Liz Estrada was a sock.

H.G.Crosby wrote:just a tad bit paranoid, aren't we kisha?

does this mean every questionable post now immediately comes from a sock?

i feel you are very anti-hosiery and quite bigoted towards argyle in particular.

shame on you.

new camp new rules, any takers?

new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

Re: new camp new rules, any takers?

it aint one of mine...

Re: it aint one of mine...

Re: it aint one of mine...