Oh for fawkes sake lets go burn something already

[BlackRockCityPimp]

Just adding another useless post. How many do I have to rack up before I'm considered dangerous?

If that rag is soaked in apple cider vinegar you are a dangerous occupier ready for gas grenades and you look like you are peaceful in the pic so that makes you very dangerous. Be careful sis, the goons might wisk you away to a FEMA camp for being ready for tear gas.

[illy dilly]

Typically I'd say "Welcome to eplaya,"
But clearly I'm late for the party,
Welcome anyway!

[wh..sh]

Typically I'd say "Welcome to eplaya,"
But clearly I'm late for the party,
Welcome anyway!

You cannot be trusted then.

[ygmir]

Typically I'd say "Welcome to eplaya,"
But clearly I'm late for the party,
Welcome anyway!

You cannot be trusted then.

*raising hand, waving wildly, jumping up and down*
can I be trussed?

[wh..sh]

Typically I'd say "Welcome to eplaya,"
But clearly I'm late for the party,
Welcome anyway!

You cannot be trusted then.

*raising hand, waving wildly, jumping up and down*
can I be trussed?

you can surely be trussed

Let me get that rope

[theCryptofishist]

Typically I'd say "Welcome to eplaya,"
But clearly I'm late for the party,

Welcome anyway!

You cannot be trusted then.

*raising hand, waving wildly, jumping up and down*
can I be trussed?

you can surely be trussed

Let me get that rope

I dunno. Ygmir is wigglier than an eel.

[ygmir]

You cannot be trusted then.

*raising hand, waving wildly, jumping up and down*
can I be trussed?

you can surely be trussed

Let me get that rope

*gleeful giggle*

[illy dilly]

Typically I'd say "Welcome to eplaya,"
But clearly I'm late for the party,
Welcome anyway!

You cannot be trusted then.

Ouch!
Last time I was late for an eplaya party, there was simply no food left.... This time it means I'm not trusted.

Don't I get a third strike?

[wh..sh]

Typically I'd say "Welcome to eplaya,"
But clearly I'm late for the party,
Welcome anyway!

You cannot be trusted then.

Ouch!
Last time I was late for an eplaya party, there was simply no food left.... This time it means I'm not trusted.

Don't I get a third strike?

Granted. You cannot be trusted then.

But if you posting count crosses 5000, I won't be able to help.

[ygmir]

does the trust/no trust thing changes with each 5K posts?

[wh..sh]

does the trust/no trust thing changes with each 5K posts?

Apparently... I might have to quote BRCP from thread, page 1.

Most users with post counts above 5000 cannot be trusted and anyone that posts more than 10 times a day needs some additional hobbies.

[ygmir]

does the trust/no trust thing changes with each 5K posts?

Apparently... I might have to quote BRCP from thread, page 1.

Most users with post counts above 5000 cannot be trusted and anyone that posts more than 10 times a day needs some additional hobbies.

so, can I pull the double negative clause, and if I post more than 10 a day, and, have over 5K posts, I'm actually trustworthy?
and, if not, is there a threshold, at every 5K, where you start over? or is it cumulative?
Could it be alternating 5K thresholds, so that at every 10K you get trustworthy, again, until you pass the next 5 k, when you become untrustworthy, again awaiting the next horizon of trustworthiness, which would also correspond with the next 10K threshold?
How about if you have socks?
Is it additive, to the "core" poster, or, is each sock isolated, and if not isolated, can said thresholds be transferred, between socks of said original poster, to accelerate, or decelerate, the approach to said trust horizon, and judgement therein?

[AntiM]

I am not going to play if there is math involved.

Welcome to the eplaya, fuckos notwithstanding.

[illy dilly]

does the trust/no trust thing changes with each 5K posts?

Apparently... I might have to quote BRCP from thread, page 1.

Most users with post counts above 5000 cannot be trusted and anyone that posts more than 10 times a day needs some additional hobbies.

so, can I pull the double negative clause, and if I post more than 10 a day, and, have over 5K posts, I'm actually trustworthy?
and, if not, is there a threshold, at every 5K, where you start over? or is it cumulative?
Could it be alternating 5K thresholds, so that at every 10K you get trustworthy, again, until you pass the next 5 k, when you become untrustworthy, again awaiting the next horizon of trustworthiness, which would also correspond with the next 10K threshold?
How about if you have socks?
Is it additive, to the "core" poster, or, is each sock isolated, and if not isolated, can said thresholds be transferred, between socks of said original poster, to accelerate, or decelerate, the approach to said trust horizon, and judgement therein?

No no no, you have it all wrong!
We have established that you are untrustworthy above 5k posts, and also for more than 10 posts a day. You can only regain trust if your post count over 10, does not accumulate to 203 words or more. Keep in mind that when quoting another poster, the words from their post DO NOT count towards your accumulated word count. But, a single posts greater than 345.5 words, but less than 376 words, negates the other 9 posts of the day, bring you back to 1 post for the day.
Regarding the multiple thousand post threshold, the 're-trustworthy' clause only takes effect under said conditions:
-NO EPLAYAN IS RE-TRUSTWORTHY BETWEEN 5K AND 7K POSTS
-After the 7k post, you are re-trustworthy every 2.5k posts if you created your account in a month with only 30 days.
-If the user accounts registered to a location WEST of the Mississippi river (Except Hawaii and Alaska), they are re-trustworthy every odd thousand after 7k (ie. 9k,11k,13k) and un-trustworthy every even thousand (ie 8k,10k,12k)
-If the user accounts registered to a location EAST of the Mississippi river, they are untrustworthy every odd thousand after 7k (ie. 9k,11k,13k) and re-trustworthy every even thousand (ie 8k,10k,12k)
-Users from Hawaii and Alaska are trustworthy every 200th post to 245th post.
-Users from Canada are always un-trustworthy since their heads split in the middle when they talk.
-The 10k post can be considered trustworthy, if the user can identify and prove, what their 10k post was.

Sock accounts are always considered to be completely untrustworthy, except for posts between 5k and 7k.
A socks post count can be used to up a Core posters post count. Though, once a socks post count is associated with a core posters count, the association is permanent.

See Yggy, its pretty easy really.

[Savannah]

CUT. PRINT!

[Nipple]

While reading Illy's post, this is where I post the youtube of the guy's head exploding.

[ygmir]

Most users with post counts above 5000 cannot be trusted and anyone that posts more than 10 times a day needs some additional hobbies.

[/quote]

does the trust/no trust thing changes with each 5K posts?

so, can I pull the double negative clause, and if I post more than 10 a day, and, have over 5K posts, I'm actually trustworthy?
and, if not, is there a threshold, at every 5K, where you start over? or is it cumulative?
Could it be alternating 5K thresholds, so that at every 10K you get trustworthy, again, until you pass the next 5 k, when you become untrustworthy, again awaiting the next horizon of trustworthiness, which would also correspond with the next 10K threshold?
How about if you have socks?
Is it additive, to the "core" poster, or, is each sock isolated, and if not isolated, can said thresholds be transferred, between socks of said original poster, to accelerate, or decelerate, the approach to said trust horizon, and judgement therein?

No no no, you have it all wrong!
We have established that you are untrustworthy above 5k posts, and also for more than 10 posts a day. You can only regain trust if your post count over 10, does not accumulate to 203 words or more. Keep in mind that when quoting another poster, the words from their post DO NOT count towards your accumulated word count. But, a single posts greater than 345.5 words, but less than 376 words, negates the other 9 posts of the day, bring you back to 1 post for the day.
Regarding the multiple thousand post threshold, the 're-trustworthy' clause only takes effect under said conditions:
-NO EPLAYAN IS RE-TRUSTWORTHY BETWEEN 5K AND 7K POSTS
-After the 7k post, you are re-trustworthy every 2.5k posts if you created your account in a month with only 30 days.
-If the user accounts registered to a location WEST of the Mississippi river (Except Hawaii and Alaska), they are re-trustworthy every odd thousand after 7k (ie. 9k,11k,13k) and un-trustworthy every even thousand (ie 8k,10k,12k)
-If the user accounts registered to a location EAST of the Mississippi river, they are untrustworthy every odd thousand after 7k (ie. 9k,11k,13k) and re-trustworthy every even thousand (ie 8k,10k,12k)
-Users from Hawaii and Alaska are trustworthy every 200th post to 245th post.
-Users from Canada are always un-trustworthy since their heads split in the middle when they talk.
-The 10k post can be considered trustworthy, if the user can identify and prove, what their 10k post was.

Sock accounts are always considered to be completely untrustworthy, except for posts between 5k and 7k.
A socks post count can be used to up a Core posters post count. Though, once a socks post count is associated with a core posters count, the association is permanent.

See Yggy, its pretty easy really.

ok thanks, that answers my question.

[wh..sh]

No no no, you have it all wrong!
We have established that you are untrustworthy above 5k posts, and also for more than 10 posts a day. You can only regain trust if your post count over 10, does not accumulate to 203 words or more. Keep in mind that when quoting another poster, the words from their post DO NOT count towards your accumulated word count. But, a single posts greater than 345.5 words, but less than 376 words, negates the other 9 posts of the day, bring you back to 1 post for the day.
Regarding the multiple thousand post threshold, the 're-trustworthy' clause only takes effect under said conditions:
-NO EPLAYAN IS RE-TRUSTWORTHY BETWEEN 5K AND 7K POSTS
-After the 7k post, you are re-trustworthy every 2.5k posts if you created your account in a month with only 30 days.
-If the user accounts registered to a location WEST of the Mississippi river (Except Hawaii and Alaska), they are re-trustworthy every odd thousand after 7k (ie. 9k,11k,13k) and un-trustworthy every even thousand (ie 8k,10k,12k)
-If the user accounts registered to a location EAST of the Mississippi river, they are untrustworthy every odd thousand after 7k (ie. 9k,11k,13k) and re-trustworthy every even thousand (ie 8k,10k,12k)
-Users from Hawaii and Alaska are trustworthy every 200th post to 245th post.
-Users from Canada are always un-trustworthy since their heads split in the middle when they talk.
-The 10k post can be considered trustworthy, if the user can identify and prove, what their 10k post was.

Sock accounts are always considered to be completely untrustworthy, except for posts between 5k and 7k.
A socks post count can be used to up a Core posters post count. Though, once a socks post count is associated with a core posters count, the association is permanent.

See Yggy, its pretty easy really.

Yggy, THIS THIS is exactly why we can't all live based on 10 rules.

[ygmir]

No no no, you have it all wrong!
We have established that you are untrustworthy above 5k posts, and also for more than 10 posts a day. You can only regain trust if your post count over 10, does not accumulate to 203 words or more. Keep in mind that when quoting another poster, the words from their post DO NOT count towards your accumulated word count. But, a single posts greater than 345.5 words, but less than 376 words, negates the other 9 posts of the day, bring you back to 1 post for the day.
Regarding the multiple thousand post threshold, the 're-trustworthy' clause only takes effect under said conditions:
-NO EPLAYAN IS RE-TRUSTWORTHY BETWEEN 5K AND 7K POSTS
-After the 7k post, you are re-trustworthy every 2.5k posts if you created your account in a month with only 30 days.
-If the user accounts registered to a location WEST of the Mississippi river (Except Hawaii and Alaska), they are re-trustworthy every odd thousand after 7k (ie. 9k,11k,13k) and un-trustworthy every even thousand (ie 8k,10k,12k)
-If the user accounts registered to a location EAST of the Mississippi river, they are untrustworthy every odd thousand after 7k (ie. 9k,11k,13k) and re-trustworthy every even thousand (ie 8k,10k,12k)
-Users from Hawaii and Alaska are trustworthy every 200th post to 245th post.
-Users from Canada are always un-trustworthy since their heads split in the middle when they talk.
-The 10k post can be considered trustworthy, if the user can identify and prove, what their 10k post was.

Sock accounts are always considered to be completely untrustworthy, except for posts between 5k and 7k.
A socks post count can be used to up a Core posters post count. Though, once a socks post count is associated with a core posters count, the association is permanent.

See Yggy, its pretty easy really.

Yggy, THIS THIS is exactly why we can't all live based on 10 rules.

yuh huh.

that's one rule, with lots of conditions.

just simplify......and quit coveting.......you know the drill.

it was a fine answer, to a simple question I asked, that's all.

[wh..sh]

it was a fine answer, to a simple question I asked, that's all

It's a mighty fine post by Illy Dilly! I especially dig the sock association clause.

[illy dilly]

ok thanks, that answers my question.

Sweet, glad I could make things nice and clear!

it was a fine answer, to a simple question I asked, that's all

It's a mighty fine post by Illy Dilly! I especially dig the sock association clause.

Speaking of clauses, we watched Santa Clause 2 last night with Tim Allen, the entire movie is based on the "misses Clause" kinda made me think of this silly thread.