Did you win tickets for less than your Max bid?

[theCryptofishist]

One of the "rangers" in our area (team lead) did'nt get a ticket even though he's a veteran burner and been a ranger for years.

This confused me cause I thought volenteers for infrastructure got free tickets.

What am I missing?

For the most part, volunteers get a discounted ticket the year after they work enough shifts. Some choose to forgo this.

[FIGJAM]

I think I'm just sufering from thread contamination.

My concern was not enough key people to take care of the dangerously unprepared masses that these threads seem to indecate will be there this year.

I gotta escape these threads for my own piece of mine!

(There's only a small piece left.)

[magdelyn]

Just for the record:

I bid for 1 ticket at $240 and got none tickets.

: )

[666isMONEY]

i won my ticket at the highest ($390) and also donated $20 to BRAF . . . wonder if the donation helped?

[Ratty]

My husband put in for a $240 ticket and got stiffed.

I know of several people that get free tickets. Believe me, it's not much of a consolation. The retail outlets that have been selling tickets forever and now can't. They have always and will continue to receive gift tickets. And some of the long-standing businesses that have been servicing the BM org till this year. They were also dumped and told "we'll still give you tickets". Imagine your job going down the shitter and they hand you a couple of tickets to make up for it.

Some of these businesses won't recover from losing a big chunk of their livelyhood. I guess this is one of those heartless non-profits.

[bradtem]

Of course the BMOrg knows very precisely the success rate at each level, while this is a self-selected poll without scientific value.

But it is curious that it shows (at present) the following success rates:

$240 tier: 33%
$320 tier: 62%
$390 tier: 52%

This does not jibe with the other surveys suggesting that theme camps only got about a third of what they asked for on average. Unless the camps almost universally tried to enter at $240 tier. We were told 80,000 people asked for 1.7 tickets each on average.

Could it be that a really large proportion of the population tried for $240 tier, and that those who bid more money had more like a 50% rate? Could it be that too many people went all or nothing on $240, being either poor or greedy, hoping to fix it in the secondary sale? In the past, I think a lot of people tried for the low price tickets even though they were willing to pay more. It's human nature -- the exact same ticket for less or more, depending on when you buy it -- most people would rather pay less, only a few have the sense of deliberately paying more to make room for others to pay less. Perhaps this extended into the lottery. People didn't realize that what they were saying is, "Give me a shot at $240. I can't afford more, so if I have to pay $320 or $390, I would prefer not to go." That's what you were saying with a $240 entry -- did you realize that?