Brothel girl in search of wild camp!!!

Zulegoona · Post by **Zulegoona** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:13 am

cowboyangel wrote:Kristy if you can now capture the hearts of the hard liners like Rob, Bob, Joel, Stuart, Badger for a start, then you've really got something going on.

I think that would be a good first set of messages to have Sensei
deliver.

Sensei · Post by **Sensei** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:18 am

I oh-so-humbly await orders... or messages. Or massages.

Rob the Wop · Post by **Rob the Wop** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:33 am

cowboyangel wrote:Kristy if you can now capture the hearts of the hard liners like Rob, Bob, Joel, Stuart, Badger for a start, then you've really got something going on.

kirstykreme wrote: 1. are you humble
2. will you follow orders, no questions asked (trust is key not blind faith)
3. can you accept ANYONE to share kindness with
4. can you reject all fear, guilt, anger and unhappiness
5. will you share all possitive ideas, perception and plans you have

Sorry, #2 and #4 would pretty much stop me.
#2 is far too dangerous a mindset for me to entertain (prior military- I can do this, but without knowing if someone personally is worthy of loyalty FIRST- ain't gonna happen).
#4 all of these emotions have their definite place. I cannot myself simply 'reject' them. Maybe the unhappiness, but the rest serve to start adrenaline pumping and provide a conscience. Nice to say they are rejected, in reality this is wishful thinking. I think you mean unnecessary fear, guilt, anger and unhappiness.

Simply Joel · Post by **Simply Joel** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:08 am

Kristy Kreme wrote:Hi Everyone !

If anyone wants to be my message boy they have to pass a test first.

1. are you humble
2. will you follow orders, no questions asked (trust is key not blind faith)
3. can you accept ANYONE to share kindness with
4. can you reject all fear, guilt, anger and unhappiness
5. will you share all possitive ideas, perception and plans you have

Put in laymens terms, can you be a friend.

Kisses, Kristy Kreme

1. at times... uh, no.
2. no, didn't in the military, won't start now.
3. yes, maybe not Pat Buchanan, Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggert
4. not exactly, i thrive on all that stuff
5. sure... as long as we are naked.

and finally, yes... in a curmudgeonly manner at all times.

can i bring my wife, "Mistress Sylvia," along?

Rian Jackson · Post by **Rian Jackson** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:10 am

Joel, i know it disgusts you because you might catch my anarcho cooties, but i think i love you.

Simply Joel · Post by **Simply Joel** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:15 am

Rian Jackson wrote:Joel, i know it disgusts you because you might catch my anarcho cooties, but i think i love you.

Anarcho-Syndicalism

Solidarity alone is capable of stopping the operations of the old order

http://www.nucleus.com/~markv/aslinks.html

may i suggest instead of stopping the operations of the older order, start a new order without the issues of the older order... a tall task, yet worth the effort.

Rian Jackson · Post by **Rian Jackson** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:18 am

i prefer to attempt both - sometimes at once, sometimes alternating.

samtzu · Post by **samtzu** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:26 am

Simply Joel wrote:
Rian Jackson wrote:Joel, i know it disgusts you because you might catch my anarcho cooties, but i think i love you.

Anarcho-Syndicalism

Solidarity alone is capable of stopping the operations of the old order

http://www.nucleus.com/~markv/aslinks.html

may i suggest instead of stopping the operations of the older order, start a new order without the issues of the older order... a tall task, yet worth the effort.

This takes a total paradigm break, which ain't easy. It sometimes ends in madness (i.e. French and Russian Revolutions; or the rising of the kundalini)

samtzu · Post by **samtzu** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:39 am

Oh, yeah... and "Meet the new boss; same as the old boss."

Rian Jackson · Post by **Rian Jackson** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:43 am

samtzu wrote:
Simply Joel wrote:
Rian Jackson wrote:Joel, i know it disgusts you because you might catch my anarcho cooties, but i think i love you.

Anarcho-Syndicalism

Solidarity alone is capable of stopping the operations of the old order

http://www.nucleus.com/~markv/aslinks.html

may i suggest instead of stopping the operations of the older order, start a new order without the issues of the older order... a tall task, yet worth the effort.
This takes a total paradigm break, which ain't easy. It sometimes ends in madness (i.e. French and Russian Revolutions; or the rising of the kundalini)

it's ok. i had a hinduism teacher who gave us the instructions for raja yoga and then told us we could go mad if we tried it without a guide. so of course, i did. every day for a time.

explains a lot, doesn't it?
ok, gotta say though, it was weird to be doing it, then look in the mirror and not recognise myself.

samtzu · Post by **samtzu** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:52 am

Rian Jackson wrote:
samtzu wrote:
Simply Joel wrote:
Anarcho-Syndicalism

Solidarity alone is capable of stopping the operations of the old order

http://www.nucleus.com/~markv/aslinks.html

may i suggest instead of stopping the operations of the older order, start a new order without the issues of the older order... a tall task, yet worth the effort.
This takes a total paradigm break, which ain't easy. It sometimes ends in madness (i.e. French and Russian Revolutions; or the rising of the kundalini)
it's ok. i had a hinduism teacher who gave us the instructions for raja yoga and then told us we could go mad if we tried it without a guide. so of course, i did. every day for a time.

explains a lot, doesn't it?
ok, gotta say though, it was weird to be doing it, then look in the mirror and not recognise myself.

That's the one, right there. That's where the break occurs. If you stay in the break long enough, the paradigm shifts by itself, and there is a new person looking back at you.

Simply Joel · Post by **Simply Joel** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:29 am

samtzu wrote:
Simply Joel wrote:
Rian Jackson wrote:Joel, i know it disgusts you because you might catch my anarcho cooties, but i think i love you.

Anarcho-Syndicalism

Solidarity alone is capable of stopping the operations of the old order

http://www.nucleus.com/~markv/aslinks.html

may i suggest instead of stopping the operations of the older order, start a new order without the issues of the older order... a tall task, yet worth the effort.
This takes a total paradigm break, which ain't easy. It sometimes ends in madness (i.e. French and Russian Revolutions; or the rising of the kundalini)

and those examples cited above are why i am quite content with changing the status quo ever so slightly instead of overthrowing the man, 'cause he's keeping me down revolution nonsense.

tisha2 · Post by **tisha2** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:36 am

i absolutely love that this conversation has erupted on the "Brothel girl in search of wild camp!!!" thread!

stuart · Post by **stuart** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:51 am

I fucking fail at every one of those qualifiacations except for perhaps #5 because I truly believe everyone is entitled to my opinion.

CA, hard liner?

I am starting to get a complex

a pretty grim view of how I am perceived

someone either lend a hand or kick me in the nuts

samtzu · Post by **samtzu** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:52 am

tisha2 wrote:i absolutely love that this conversation has erupted on the "Brothel girl in search of wild camp!!!" thread!

But of course... would you expect this to occur in the "Greatest Baseball Fans in the World!" thread? Don't be silly....

GuinivereElise · Post by **GuinivereElise** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:53 am

Kristy Kreme wrote:Hi Everyone !

If anyone wants to be my message boy they have to pass a test first.

1. are you humble
2. will you follow orders, no questions asked (trust is key not blind faith)
3. can you accept ANYONE to share kindness with
4. can you reject all fear, guilt, anger and unhappiness
5. will you share all possitive ideas, perception and plans you have

Put in laymens terms, can you be a friend.

Kisses, Kristy Kreme

Wait---

my friends are supposed to 'follow orders, no questions asked'???! That's what a friend does? Shit: I've been hanging out with the wrong crowd...

Rian Jackson · Post by **Rian Jackson** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:54 am

stuart wrote:I fucking fail at every one of those qualifiacations except for perhaps #5 because I truly believe everyone is entitled to my opinion.

CA, hard liner?

I am starting to get a complex

a pretty grim view of how I am perceived

someone either lend a hand or kick me in the nuts

what was that about handling your nuts? i didn't think you wanted that from me, Stuie the Cutie

samtzu · Post by **samtzu** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:58 am

Kristy Kreme wrote:Hi Everyone !

If anyone wants to be my message boy they have to pass a test first.

1. are you humble
2. will you follow orders, no questions asked (trust is key not blind faith)
3. can you accept ANYONE to share kindness with
4. can you reject all fear, guilt, anger and unhappiness
5. will you share all possitive ideas, perception and plans you have

Put in laymens terms, can you be a friend.

Kisses, Kristy Kreme

No one can answer #1. truthfully... so, someone else decide for me.
#2? Nope. I almost got my ass blown away doing that... there's no telling what could happen to my ass this time... 'course, then again I may like it...
#3... If they are willing to share, also, and not act like a rabid vampire, sucking every fucking bit of kindness out of me and leaving me alone as an undead husk of life-that-once-was.
#4 No... but I'm doing better!!
#5 Absolutely!! As a matter of fact, at some point you may want to stuff something in my mouth just to shut me up!!

And, yeah... I can be a friend...

Rian Jackson · Post by **Rian Jackson** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:01 am

Kristy Kreme wrote: 1. are you humble
2. will you follow orders, no questions asked (trust is key not blind faith)

Put in laymens terms, can you be a friend.

So, Kristy, do you live up to these? Who do you take your orders from? So is this a friend/ master relationship? I'm totally confused. Because some of these are not very reciprocal. And it seems like someone who's humble wouldn't be giving orders.

Oi. i'm headed back to the bar. booze is less confusing.

tisha2 · Post by **tisha2** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:12 am

samtzu wrote:
tisha2 wrote:i absolutely love that this conversation has erupted on the "Brothel girl in search of wild camp!!!" thread!

But of course... would you expect this to occur in the "Greatest Baseball Fans in the World!" thread? Don't be silly....

AND "Greatest Baseball blah blah" thread has become a discussion on socialism!!!! heehee!

Rian Jackson · Post by **Rian Jackson** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:17 am

i've stalwartly REFUSED to read the baseball thread. gak.

GuinivereElise · Post by **GuinivereElise** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:24 am

Rian Jackson wrote:i've stalwartly REFUSED to read the baseball thread. gak.

I heartily concur...

and I'll see your gak, and raise you a blech.

tisha2 · Post by **tisha2** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:24 am

samtzu wrote: No one can answer #1. truthfully... so, someone else decide for me.
#2? Nope. I almost got my ass blown away doing that... there's no telling what could happen to my ass this time... 'course, then again I may like it...
#3... If they are willing to share, also, and not act like a rabid vampire, sucking every fucking bit of kindness out of me and leaving me alone as an undead husk of life-that-once-was.
#4 No... but I'm doing better!!
#5 Absolutely!! As a matter of fact, at some point you may want to stuff something in my mouth just to shut me up!!

And, yeah... I can be a friend...

you fucking said it.

Simply Joel · Post by **Simply Joel** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:58 am

stuart wrote:I fucking fail at every one of those qualifiacations except for perhaps #5 because I truly believe everyone is entitled to my opinion.
CA, hard liner?
I am starting to get a complex
a pretty grim view of how I am perceived
someone either lend a hand or kick me in the nuts

stuart, yes you are as grim as perceived.... aint it great?

a curmdugeon in the making, i tell ya...

by the way, this was lending a hand... not the latter.

Simply Joel · Post by **Simply Joel** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:25 pm

tisha2 wrote:
samtzu wrote:
tisha2 wrote:i absolutely love that this conversation has erupted on the "Brothel girl in search of wild camp!!!" thread!

But of course... would you expect this to occur in the "Greatest Baseball Fans in the World!" thread? Don't be silly....
AND "Greatest Baseball blah blah" thread has become a discussion on socialism!!!! heehee!

psuedo-socialism... actually salary caps from the liberal left, who would have thunk it.

Sensei · Post by **Sensei** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:27 pm

You guys are just jealous I got the job. Though truthfully, I have yet to relay my first "massage".

* Sensei goes back to filing his nails *

Simply Joel · Post by **Simply Joel** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:27 pm

Simply Joel wrote:
tisha2 wrote:
samtzu wrote: But of course... would you expect this to occur in the "Greatest Baseball Fans in the World!" thread? Don't be silly....
AND "Greatest Baseball blah blah" thread has become a discussion on socialism!!!! heehee!
pseudo-socialism... actually salary caps from the liberal left, who would have thunk it.

tisha2 · Post by **tisha2** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:16 pm

Simply Joel wrote:
Simply Joel wrote:
tisha2 wrote: AND "Greatest Baseball blah blah" thread has become a discussion on socialism!!!! heehee!
pseudo-socialism... actually salary caps from the liberal left, who would have thunk it.

are you fishing for a response?

helitack · Post by **helitack** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:49 pm

On second though Kristy, I retract the message boy offer, I would rather be the massage boy. If there is such a position. I just happen to have this massage lotion...............

Simply Joel · Post by **Simply Joel** » Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:56 pm

tisha2 wrote:
Simply Joel wrote:
Simply Joel wrote: pseudo-socialism... actually salary caps from the liberal left, who would have thunk it.
are you fishing for a response?

correcting a misspelling, actually.

Brothel girl in search of wild camp!!!

message boys

Re: message boys

Re: message boys

Re: message boys

Re: message boys