They are British, and French colonial era postcards.theCryptofishist wrote:It's an amazing piece of "exotica." Have we reclaimed ground from that kind of colonization?
There does seem to be both “US military, army girlsâ€
Hmmmm, I see just a bit, well maybe a lot, of over analyzing here.theCryptofishist wrote:I wonder how "staged" those photos are.
I guess you're right about ownership of by the photographer.
It's just the whole history of eroticization of marginal peoples, including the natives in colonial situations.
But there is something much sweeter than a lot of modern porn. Not simply that more is implied and less shown, but that there's a certain crassness in the modern pics I've seen.
I'm guessing that the models were prostitutes.
Fuck you, too. Just because it's a simple thing for you, doesn't mean it's simple for me. Things like objectification are interesting to me, it's the kind of mind I have. You don't have to participate, but you've no cause to belittle it.goathead wrote: Hmmmm, I see just a bit, well maybe a lot, of over analyzing here.
It's hard to tell directly about the status of the women shown. They may well be violating local conventions by posing topless, but that does not directly lead to prostitution. Given our limited knowledge it depends on the story that one wants to construct. Your guess may be correct, of course, since prostitutes are generally already on display (and more) for cash.theCryptofishist wrote:I wonder how "staged" those photos are.
I guess you're right about ownership of by the photographer.
It's just the whole history of eroticization of marginal peoples, including the natives in colonial situations.
But there is something much sweeter than a lot of modern porn. Not simply that more is implied and less shown, but that there's a certain crassness in the modern pics I've seen.
I'm guessing that the models were prostitutes.