Silver writes:I put my young and stupid ass on the line for this
The right to be an obnoxious asshole?
On the whole I would rather be dead; indeed if I could tell the difference. Right now I actually live in Northern VA, come next June the kid is out of high school and I am moving into the city. In about 10 years I can totally pack it in and retire, (thought it would be sooner but the divorce is a big hit) and I am only looking a metro areas of 2 mill plus, and warm, the only snow I ever want to see again is on mountains waaayyy in the distance.move out West, breathe some clean air, sit with the other rednecks in the Owl Club in some dusty town
I think the point was made earlier by someone other than me that this space (e-playa) is a privately owned entitiy. Whether TOS takes precedence over the US Constitution is a question to be determined by the judicial system... or as it plays out in the "open market."Maia wrote:...does the TOS take precedence over the US Constitution?
Absolutely. Private contracts can and will restrict your rights. I am currently under a Non-Disclosure Agreement from my work. This means I cannot talk about confidential information to people not in my company.Maia wrote:does the TOS take precedence over the US Constitution?
When you buy a house in Celebration, Florida you give up such civic rights as voting in city elections, instead the corporation takes care of such things. Even less micro-managing condo boards routinely take away the option of hanging your clothes on a line to dry. When you think of the energy wasted by manditory use of dryers and the subsequent building of power plants . . . that's too bad. It's still legal.Rob the Wop wrote:
Absolutely. Private contracts can and will restrict your rights. I am currently under a Non-Disclosure Agreement from my work. This means I cannot talk about confidential information to people not in my company.
Beaten to the punch, Alpha replied:We're not withholding the distribution rights of your half-cocked ideas ransom.
Regardless of political philosophy, I'm at a loss to understand why anyone marginally familiar with free-speech issues in this country can't grok this. To suggest that the Constitution(TM) somehow still trumps decades of legal definition and clarification is just absurd. BRR's contrarian yodelling to the contrary doesn't do much when the avalanche of precedent is heading his way.Let me add, "or provide you a forum in which to speak. That's not why eplaya is here.".
I feel I am already there... cold beverage in hand...stuart wrote:promise? I will make a deal with you. I will ignore you if I know whom to ignore. If you stay BRR, I promise not to respond, ever.Ignore me, in fact if all of your ignored me, maybe I would go away,,
Anyone wanna join me in this experiment?
Here it is. <PLONK>theCryptofishist wrote: Oh where oh where has my little plonk gone?
Oh where oh where can it be?
It kept me from idiots who ranted too long,
Bring back my plonker to me.
Bring back, bring back, oh bring back my plonker to me (to me!)
Bring back, bring back, oh bring back my plonker to me
When I was living in rural California there was a definite "type" who would spend a lot of time reading the constitution and ignoring all other laws. (At least until they were pulled over for driving without liscence and registration--fear would take over then.) It was religious fundimental literalism only with a different source document. Trying to bring up how actual people actually lived was simply too much for them. They couldn't fathom the difference between purities and practicalities. They tended to be marginal people without much in the way of social skills. They could actually be well-informed and intelligent on other issues though.KellY wrote: a complete loon
theCryptofishist wrote:When I was living in rural California there was a definite "type" who would spend a lot of time reading the constitution and ignoring all other laws. (At least until they were pulled over for driving without liscence and registration--fear would take over then.) It was religious fundimental literalism only with a different source document. Trying to bring up how actual people actually lived was simply too much for them. They couldn't fathom the difference between purities and practicalities. They tended to be marginal people without much in the way of social skills. They could actually be well-informed and intelligent on other issues though.KellY wrote: a complete loon
Our Grinch has always seemed cut from this cloth to me.
Um, I have no idea what you're asking me. And I don't really see how knowing one of the founders of Sierra Nevada Brewing is relevant to anything.BRR wrote: Kelly,, I cain't be half right can I?? Back in college I had a climbing buddy, he used to brew his own beer.. Taught me to do the same in my hippie cabin along the Feather River.. He went on and opened a homebrew shop, then got some financial backing and opened a brewery in.... Chico,, he makes a finel pale ale.