Fascism in Action

All things outside of Burning Man.
Post Reply
User avatar
Silver
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:45 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by Silver » Wed May 05, 2004 8:17 pm

BRR wrote:
I put my young and stupid ass on the line for this
Silver writes:
The right to be an obnoxious asshole?
My grandfather tried to raise me as a Southern gentleman, that means that I can be a real SOB some of the time.

User avatar
Zephryus
Posts: 208
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 7:06 am
Location: On A Goddamn Boat
Contact:

Post by Zephryus » Wed May 05, 2004 9:20 pm

The court recognizes Bob's request for BRR to behave in a responsible and respectful fashion, and SECONDS the motion. Objections?

The court recognizes KellY's hypothetical questions and ACCEPTS them as relevant to the social dynamics currently being discussed.
The court also ACCEPTS Badger's extension of KellY's hypothetical situation, with thanks for the mental image.

Rodent's particularly witty Mayo reference is ACCEPTED.

BRR's argument that free speech which is not directly harmful should be all-pervasive and applied equally to any given situation is DENIED, on the grounds that this website has a well-published set of Cummunity Guidelines and Terms of Service, which are linked to at the bottom of each page of these boards, and which BRR explicitly agreed to adhere to when he activated his account. These documents apply strictures to one's freedom of expression beyond those set by the constitution, and are held to be valid by this court, the Administrators and Moderators of this board, and the vast majority of this board's active members. While the court is receptive to challenges made to these documents and the principles they are founded upon, "But I don't wanna!" is not considered a proper challenge. Furthermore, the court finds BRR in contempt for use of needless hyperbole in stating his case. While the court is receptive to charges levied against this board and its members, these charges must necessarily be backed up with convincing evidence and rational, well stated arguments, both of which BRR has thus far refused to supply.

Put or shut up, bitch.

Pending BRR's (likely) failure to, in fact , "put up," the court recognizes Bob's recommendation that the Administrators freely associate BRR's ass with the door and SECONDS the motion.

User avatar
Isotopia
Posts: 2848
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 11:26 am

Post by Isotopia » Wed May 05, 2004 11:15 pm

<engaging maximum anti-Pepsi-blast-through-the-nose computer monitor protection shield>

Off to the crush thread.

User avatar
Silver
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:45 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by Silver » Thu May 06, 2004 2:51 am

Sorry about the last posting,went over the top there. I was working from home and dealing with a 17 year old whose attitudes greatly remind me of BBR.
My grandfather tried to raise me as a Southern gentleman, that means that I can be a real SOB some of the time.

Simply Joel
Posts: 3483
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:08 am
Location: Land of Lincoln
Contact:

Post by Simply Joel » Thu May 06, 2004 6:05 am

Isotopia wrote:<engaging maximum anti-Pepsi-blast-through-the-nose computer monitor protection shield>
That is funny, too.

Maia
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 7:30 am

You alls

Post by Maia » Thu May 06, 2004 7:20 am

Dear Dear zeph.. I have read your posts regarding freedom of speech and TOS. I just wanted to add something. Where in the TOS is a violation by Ric? And,,, does the TOS take precedence over the US Constitution?

And Silver,, perhaps living within the Beltway has skewed your reason. My advice, move out West, breathe some clean air, sit with the other rednecks in the Owl Club in some dusty town and complain about "liberals' and their unreasonable interpretations of the Constitution.. buncha faggots anyway, right?

Love,

Maia

User avatar
Silver
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:45 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by Silver » Thu May 06, 2004 7:38 am

move out West, breathe some clean air, sit with the other rednecks in the Owl Club in some dusty town
On the whole I would rather be dead; indeed if I could tell the difference. Right now I actually live in Northern VA, come next June the kid is out of high school and I am moving into the city. In about 10 years I can totally pack it in and retire, (thought it would be sooner but the divorce is a big hit) and I am only looking a metro areas of 2 mill plus, and warm, the only snow I ever want to see again is on mountains waaayyy in the distance.
My grandfather tried to raise me as a Southern gentleman, that means that I can be a real SOB some of the time.

Simply Joel
Posts: 3483
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:08 am
Location: Land of Lincoln
Contact:

Re: You alls

Post by Simply Joel » Thu May 06, 2004 7:54 am

Maia wrote:...does the TOS take precedence over the US Constitution?
I think the point was made earlier by someone other than me that this space (e-playa) is a privately owned entitiy. Whether TOS takes precedence over the US Constitution is a question to be determined by the judicial system... or as it plays out in the "open market."

On a related note, I am unclear whether the legislative branch is sufficiently informed, let alone engaged in e-commerce, e-community and e-taxation... but I am going to assert that "once they figure it out, all bets are off" regarding the e-world. The legislative branch simply hasn't figured out how to "get their fingers into the pie."

Guest

Michael Moore

Post by Guest » Thu May 06, 2004 8:16 am

Did you listen to Michael Moore on CNN.. Media companies suppressing dissent.. This being a media company, sometimes suppressing dissent. Does that mean when the revolution comes, Eisner and Harvey, hopefully not Nicole,, she is not butt ugly.. (likely go up against the wall)

User avatar
Alpha
Posts: 764
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 4:55 pm

Post by Alpha » Thu May 06, 2004 8:17 am

In what way is eplaya a media company??

User avatar
Ranger Genius
Posts: 2408
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 7:07 am
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain
Contact:

Post by Ranger Genius » Thu May 06, 2004 9:01 am

Here's the difference: We're not trying to stop you from getting the message out. We're not withholding the distribution rights of your half-cocked ideas ransom. You have every right to publish them and distribute them. But that doesn't mean we have to buy them.

I support your right to say what you have to say, BRR, but that doesn't mean I have to listen to you.
“We cross our bridges when we come to them and burn them behind us, with nothing to show for our progress except a memory of the smell of smoke, and a presumption that once our eyes watered.”

User avatar
Alpha
Posts: 764
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 4:55 pm

Post by Alpha » Thu May 06, 2004 9:04 am

Ranger Genius wrote:I support your right to say what you have to say, BRR, but that doesn't mean I have to listen to you.
Let me add, "or provide you a forum in which to speak. That's not why eplaya is here."

User avatar
theCryptofishist
Posts: 40312
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
Burning Since: 2017
Location: In Exile

Post by theCryptofishist » Thu May 06, 2004 9:05 am

Another first amendment right.
Free Assembly. We have the right to freely assemble on the Playa. We do not have the right to assemble on the Black Rock Grinch's privately owned ranch. Is this an infringement on our rights? No. (Just as well, I'm sure my pitchfork and torch would be no match for his "fire power.")

User avatar
Rob the Wop
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 4:06 pm
Location: Furbackistan, OR
Contact:

Re: You alls

Post by Rob the Wop » Thu May 06, 2004 9:08 am

Maia wrote:does the TOS take precedence over the US Constitution?
Absolutely. Private contracts can and will restrict your rights. I am currently under a Non-Disclosure Agreement from my work. This means I cannot talk about confidential information to people not in my company.

Private contracts can restrict your right to freedom, speech, etc. When you set up an account on this board, you accept the agreements of a private contract with the mediators of this board. Also a business (of which this BBS is a portion of) has the right to refuse service to individuals, so long as it is not discriminations based upon race, faith, etc.

Trying to make a Supreme Court case out of getting tossed from a BBS is kind of pointless, really. If you could find one lawyer that would not consider you a nutcase, then you would simply end up with a possible frivolous lawsuit countersuit. You would never win a "free speech" case in a real court.
[b]The other, other white meat.[/b]

User avatar
theCryptofishist
Posts: 40312
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
Burning Since: 2017
Location: In Exile

Re: You alls

Post by theCryptofishist » Thu May 06, 2004 9:14 am

Rob the Wop wrote:
Absolutely. Private contracts can and will restrict your rights. I am currently under a Non-Disclosure Agreement from my work. This means I cannot talk about confidential information to people not in my company.
When you buy a house in Celebration, Florida you give up such civic rights as voting in city elections, instead the corporation takes care of such things. Even less micro-managing condo boards routinely take away the option of hanging your clothes on a line to dry. When you think of the energy wasted by manditory use of dryers and the subsequent building of power plants . . . that's too bad. It's still legal.

Guest

s

Post by Guest » Thu May 06, 2004 9:19 am

Alpha,, the internet is media,, eplaya is part of a company.

Ranger, but you are listening, and reading, and responding. That would make me an integral part of your eplaya media experience.. Ignore me, in fact if all of your ignored me, maybe I would go away,, try it see if it works.. But I think, you cannot resist the bait. Funny aside,, the bm cult is referred to by some as Bmorg. There is a website in which former Mormons moan about the the church which they refer to as the Morg.

If you have the right to peaceably assemble on the Playa, do I not have the right to peaceably assemble on the Playa too, same place same time without paying money to a private company for the use of public land? What I would like to do in drive my dune buggy freely and peaceably thoughout the playa without restrictions placed by profit making organizations..

Don't you have the right to peaceably assemble on nearby Hotsprings during burning Man? But the burning man organization puts security guards at the hot springs to turn you away..

Can't you twist the right of assembly and the right of free speech into knots, unless you strip it to the simplicity of; it is exactly what it says it is?

User avatar
Alpha
Posts: 764
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 4:55 pm

Post by Alpha » Thu May 06, 2004 9:21 am

*plonk*

User avatar
Isotopia
Posts: 2848
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 11:26 am

Post by Isotopia » Thu May 06, 2004 9:30 am

We're not withholding the distribution rights of your half-cocked ideas ransom.
Beaten to the punch, Alpha replied:
Let me add, "or provide you a forum in which to speak. That's not why eplaya is here.".
Regardless of political philosophy, I'm at a loss to understand why anyone marginally familiar with free-speech issues in this country can't grok this. To suggest that the Constitution(TM) somehow still trumps decades of legal definition and clarification is just absurd. BRR's contrarian yodelling to the contrary doesn't do much when the avalanche of precedent is heading his way.

User avatar
DVD Burner
Posts: 11031
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:09 am
Burning Since: 1986
Camp Name: White Trash Camp
Contact:

Post by DVD Burner » Thu May 06, 2004 11:24 am

I'm starting to like BRR. Suddenly everyone is starting to realize........ I'm not that bad after all huh.
:lol:

If ya'll had'nt delt with me, ya'll would'nt have been prepaired for fighting in the mud with BRR. :lol:
https://www.facebook.com/NeXTCODER

User avatar
stuart
Posts: 3325
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 10:45 am
Location: East of Lincoln

Post by stuart » Thu May 06, 2004 11:54 am

Ignore me, in fact if all of your ignored me, maybe I would go away,,
promise? I will make a deal with you. I will ignore you if I know whom to ignore. If you stay BRR, I promise not to respond, ever.

Anyone wanna join me in this experiment?

Simply Joel
Posts: 3483
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:08 am
Location: Land of Lincoln
Contact:

Post by Simply Joel » Thu May 06, 2004 11:57 am

stuart wrote:
Ignore me, in fact if all of your ignored me, maybe I would go away,,
promise? I will make a deal with you. I will ignore you if I know whom to ignore. If you stay BRR, I promise not to respond, ever.

Anyone wanna join me in this experiment?
I feel I am already there... cold beverage in hand...

User avatar
KellY
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 11:32 am

Post by KellY » Thu May 06, 2004 12:06 pm

I'm actually in the position of thinking that BRR is a complete loon regarding his rabid attacks on the event and his bizarre assertions about his rights here (If Burning Man is a media company because the internet is media and the LLC is a compnany, that make pretty much every business in the world that ,say, publishes a company newsletter for empoyees a media company too), while agreeing with him wholeheartedly on the Environmental thread.

So, I will limit myself to ignoring his bullshit about the event but maintain dialogue in other spheres. A little more courtesy would go long way though, BRR.
"Of what use is a philosopher who doesn't hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes

User avatar
theCryptofishist
Posts: 40312
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
Burning Since: 2017
Location: In Exile

Post by theCryptofishist » Thu May 06, 2004 12:09 pm

Nice thought, boys, but that "maybe" makes me think that it's an idle promise. (Think of the source, now.)







Oh where oh where has my little plonk gone?
Oh where oh where can it be?
It kept me from idiots who ranted too long,
Bring back my plonker to me.
Bring back, bring back, oh bring back my plonker to me (to me!)
Bring back, bring back, oh bring back my plonker to me

User avatar
DVD Burner
Posts: 11031
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:09 am
Burning Since: 1986
Camp Name: White Trash Camp
Contact:

Post by DVD Burner » Thu May 06, 2004 12:14 pm

theCryptofishist wrote: Oh where oh where has my little plonk gone?
Oh where oh where can it be?
It kept me from idiots who ranted too long,
Bring back my plonker to me.
Bring back, bring back, oh bring back my plonker to me (to me!)
Bring back, bring back, oh bring back my plonker to me
Here it is. <PLONK>
https://www.facebook.com/NeXTCODER

User avatar
theCryptofishist
Posts: 40312
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
Burning Since: 2017
Location: In Exile

Post by theCryptofishist » Thu May 06, 2004 12:15 pm

KellY wrote: a complete loon
When I was living in rural California there was a definite "type" who would spend a lot of time reading the constitution and ignoring all other laws. (At least until they were pulled over for driving without liscence and registration--fear would take over then.) It was religious fundimental literalism only with a different source document. Trying to bring up how actual people actually lived was simply too much for them. They couldn't fathom the difference between purities and practicalities. They tended to be marginal people without much in the way of social skills. They could actually be well-informed and intelligent on other issues though.



Our Grinch has always seemed cut from this cloth to me.

User avatar
DVD Burner
Posts: 11031
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:09 am
Burning Since: 1986
Camp Name: White Trash Camp
Contact:

Post by DVD Burner » Thu May 06, 2004 12:20 pm

My bad. <PLONK>


and as far as:

theCryptofishist wrote:
KellY wrote: a complete loon
When I was living in rural California there was a definite "type" who would spend a lot of time reading the constitution and ignoring all other laws. (At least until they were pulled over for driving without liscence and registration--fear would take over then.) It was religious fundimental literalism only with a different source document. Trying to bring up how actual people actually lived was simply too much for them. They couldn't fathom the difference between purities and practicalities. They tended to be marginal people without much in the way of social skills. They could actually be well-informed and intelligent on other issues though.



Our Grinch has always seemed cut from this cloth to me.


it's the fear of being wrong and admitting it.
https://www.facebook.com/NeXTCODER

dragonfly Jafe
Posts: 1877
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 11:08 am
Location: the Oregon Trail

Re: "freedom of assembly"

Post by dragonfly Jafe » Thu May 06, 2004 12:20 pm

[quote="BRR"]If you have the right to peaceably assemble on the Playa, do I not have the right to peaceably assemble on the Playa too, same place same time without paying money to a private company for the use of public land? What I would like to do in drive my dune buggy freely and peaceably thoughout the playa without restrictions placed by profit making organizations.. quote]

Citizens of BRC have the "right" to assemble as they do because of a private contract (their ticket) between them and the BM llc. The BM llc has the legal "right" to this space because of a private contract between the BM llc and the BLM.

The closure order that BLM puts into effect temporarily removes BRC from "public land". The government can do this. Try exercising your "right" to the portion of BRD that the BM llc rents, and you will find the error of your thinking.

You could always out-bid the BM llc and rent the BRC space for yourself. Then you would be free to open this space to anyone you choose (or restrict anyone you choose). You could even sell tickets to your event!

regards, Jafe

Simply Joel
Posts: 3483
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:08 am
Location: Land of Lincoln
Contact:

A call for tolerance of the stupid and handicapped

Post by Simply Joel » Thu May 06, 2004 12:25 pm

Ya kno' there isn't any new inhabitable land being created in recent history (volcanic areas aren't all that habitable right after a lava flow).... so, me thinks...

"We all had better learn to get along with one another... 'cause we are running out of space."

Guest

lotta them side canyon dudes

Post by Guest » Thu May 06, 2004 1:21 pm

Carry a lotta weapons too, always pays to be courteous,, and also not to drive up them side canyons..

Kelly,, I cain't be half right can I?? Back in college I had a climbing buddy, he used to brew his own beer.. Taught me to do the same in my hippie cabin along the Feather River.. He went on and opened a homebrew shop, then got some financial backing and opened a brewery in.... Chico,, he makes a finel pale ale.

User avatar
KellY
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 11:32 am

Re: lotta them side canyon dudes

Post by KellY » Thu May 06, 2004 2:18 pm

BRR wrote: Kelly,, I cain't be half right can I?? Back in college I had a climbing buddy, he used to brew his own beer.. Taught me to do the same in my hippie cabin along the Feather River.. He went on and opened a homebrew shop, then got some financial backing and opened a brewery in.... Chico,, he makes a finel pale ale.
Um, I have no idea what you're asking me. And I don't really see how knowing one of the founders of Sierra Nevada Brewing is relevant to anything.

Cryptofish makes a good point. I think all fundamentalists are dangerous and out of touch with reality, be they free-market nuts, 2nd amendment-NRA people, Christians, scientific materialists, whatever.
"Of what use is a philosopher who doesn't hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes

Post Reply

Return to “Open Discussion”