I try to keep these things short, but sometimes that just leaves obvious questions.ygmir wrote:I'll tell ya, Gyre, what I appreciate about these long winded posts, by both of us:
hopefully, it gets info and opinions (which vary), out in the open and available to some who may not have as much experience, allowing a more informed decision.
Thanks for that.
You really should try some real world experiments.
It's just better to see for yourself.
We wanted to see a real world comparison for ourselves and we wanted to confirm that the high performance self defense ammo is worth the high cost.
(It is, at least to the point that your gun can handle it.)
I doubt there is a power advantage with the 7.62 ammo due to design, but the good stuff is ultra reliable.
There are plenty of gelatin tests out there, but I didn't think they would really address the question.
I know some coroners I could ask.
Coroners and trauma surgeons don't have anything positive to say about being shot.
As it happens, I took my qualification class with a trauma surgeon from the hospital that gets the worst cases here.
It's only anecdotal, but Corbon gets many calls from coroners about the Glaser fragmenting round.
Some there think it is the most dangerous round, on average.
It is thought to spread after penetration.
It occurs to me that although california seems to still ban many semi-automatic rifles for "assault weapon" nonsense, if you buy the legal pre May selectable weapons, you can still use them in california.
So, machine gun legal.
Single fire, not legal.
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
The assault rifle version
[youtube][/youtube]
Hydrostatic Shock or possibly more correctly Fluid Dynamic Shock
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatic_shock











