MY FAVORITE VIDEO (TODAY) IS...

C.f.M. · Post by **C.f.M.** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:07 am

[youtube][/youtube]

Roberto Dobbisano · Post by **Roberto Dobbisano** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:35 am

that was wrong.......horribly horribly wrong.

im going to go take some Versed and try to forget the last 15 minutes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midazolam

Simon of the Playa · Post by **Simon of the Playa** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:11 pm

[youtube][/youtube]

geospyder · Post by **geospyder** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:50 pm

[youtube][/youtube]

Ugly Dougly · Post by **Ugly Dougly** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:31 am

With kind regards to Callahan's crosstime saloon:
[youtube][/youtube]

goathead · Post by **goathead** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 8:00 am

a little doom for your morning.

[youtube][/youtube]

geekster · Post by **geekster** » Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:40 pm

[youtube][/youtube]

Ugly Dougly · Post by **Ugly Dougly** » Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:11 pm

Here:
[youtube][/youtube]
Now you can afford tickets.

zachass · Post by **zachass** » Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:18 pm

an oldie but a goodie...

[youtube][/youtube]

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:52 pm

[youtube][/youtube]

geekster · Post by **geekster** » Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:15 am

[youtube][/youtube]

geekster · Post by **geekster** » Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:25 am

DVD, the French guy lost me when he said that a map that would take many minutes to load on IPv4 would load instantly on IPv6 and that would be an incentive for adoption.

That is not true. IPv6 does not give you any additional bandwidth, in fact just the opposite. The huge packet headers now because you need 256 bits for addressing (128 for source + 128 for destination) instead of only 64 bits means that for a given number of IPv6 packets you actually have less data transferred.

The ONLY benefit for v6 at this point is the increased address space. If it was better technology, network operators would have pulled it into the mainstream 10 years ago. IPv4 address depletion is the only thing that is going to drive v6.

scotto · Post by **scotto** » Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:08 am

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:31 am

geekster wrote:DVD, the French guy lost me when he said that a map that would take many minutes to load on IPv4 would load instantly on IPv6 and that would be an incentive for adoption.

I have been telling this and posting this for years on this board. It is instantaneous.

geekster wrote: That is not true. IPv6 does not give you any additional bandwidth, in fact just the opposite. The huge packet headers now because you need 256 bits for addressing (128 for source + 128 for destination) instead of only 64 bits means that for a given number of IPv6 packets you actually have less data transferred.

I do not believe you have tried this.

It is instantaneous. That is, if you go IPV6 to IPV6. Tunnel it.
if you have comcast and a linksys router you can do it and see for yourself.
Comcast is straight IPV6 ready. Just update the the firmware on the linksys and you are set.

Trust me, I have been working with it now for 7 years. It has always had the same response if you have it hooked up right.
It's why youtube has gone with it starting last Thursday and Google started using it as it's standard since 2006.

geekster wrote: The ONLY benefit for v6 at this point is the increased address space. If it was better technology, network operators would have pulled it into the mainstream 10 years ago. IPv4 address depletion is the only thing that is going to drive v6.

Not quite, it is by far more secure due to a much improved ipsec and NAT.

But these things I have been saying for years and other scientists have known this and are proving it to this day.

It's neither here nor there tho. It's finally here to stay.

Folks will catch on kicking and screaming. It's the way it is.

We should really continue this topic here since I have more up to date info on this there.

geekster · Post by **geekster** » Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:37 am

DVD, it is what I do for a living. The bits move across the wire at the same speed regardless if the packets have an ipv4 header or an ipv6 header surrounding the data. The IP protocol doesn't change the transport layer.

I hope you were being sarcastic and don't actually believe that.

It is like saying that red Mustangs go faster than blue Mustangs.

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:09 am

And you are saying I dont do this for a living?

And you are saying one of the lead/senior engineers on the Google panel, the French guy you were just talking about, does not do this for a living?

Just because you have not been successful at it does not mean this not to be true.
Anyhoo, not going to discuss this here.

[youtube][/youtube]

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:15 pm

Just a correction on security:

Security

Security - Built in to IPv6; whereas IPSec is an add-on to IPv4.
Speed of IPv6

Also:

IPv6 will be faster in several ways. Physically, because IPv6 does not fragment the packets as IPv4 does. Logically, because IPv6 will be hierarchical, thus internet routers won't need such large routing tables. In addition, IPv6 headers have been redesigned to speed their path through a router and to create true 'end to end' capability, the result is more efficient network traffic on the internet backbone

Another difference between IPv4 and IPv6 is in the smarter allocation of IPv6 addresses. Rather than first come first served basis as seen with IPv4, IPv6 addresses will be leased on geographic region. Take Europe for example, RIPE (RÃ©seaux IP EuropÃ©ens) has allocated the UK-BT IPv6 addresses beginning with 2001:0618

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:12 pm

[youtube][/youtube]

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:52 pm

Youtube has this posted on their site as a free 1 hour and 14 minute comedy.
Go figure! And it's pretty good!

[youtube][/youtube]

C.f.M. · Post by **C.f.M.** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:45 am

[youtube][/youtube]

"...it's basically like if the aliens from District 9 learned how to make "next level beats," took on human form, started a band, and then moved to Xenia, Ohio, to open up a Gummo/Dubstep Museum."

[youtube][/youtube]

ibdave · Post by **ibdave** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:55 pm

[youtube][/youtube]

geekster · Post by **geekster** » Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:28 am

[youtube][/youtube]

lonestoner916 · Post by **lonestoner916** » Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:06 pm

http://video.adultswim.com/robot-chicke ... esday.html

DVD Burner · Post by **DVD Burner** » Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:30 pm

http://www.tagtele.com/swf/embed5.0.11. ... t/11924/1/

theCryptofishist · Post by **theCryptofishist** » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:59 am

I'm interested in what the people outside of california think.

[youtube][/youtube]

lonestoner916 · Post by **lonestoner916** » Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:15 pm

[youtube][/youtube]

Ugly Dougly · Post by **Ugly Dougly** » Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:09 pm

I can't believe you haven't seen this.
[youtube][/youtube]

Ranger Genius · Post by **Ranger Genius** » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:53 am

This is a rough-cut sample of the RiffTrax iRiff of The Karate Kid I helped write and perform.

[youtube][/youtube]

Currently writing one for Star Trek: Voyager S1E16, "Learning Curve."

geekster · Post by **geekster** » Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:15 pm

[youtube][/youtube]

The first 10 minutes of MTV. Now you know the first music video ever played on MTV.

You know you are old if you remember when MTV actually played pretty much nothing but music.

Ugly Dougly · Post by **Ugly Dougly** » Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:53 pm

I'll be exorcising malevolent spirits soon. Wish me luck.

[youtube][/youtube]

MY FAVORITE VIDEO (TODAY) IS...

I Can't Believe This Hasn't Been Posted Here Yet