Genius vs. Brilliance
Genius vs. Brilliance
What distinguishes pure genius from mere brilliance? Give examples of both. For example, the music of Green Day is brilliant in my opinion, but it seems beyond dispute that the music of The Clash is genius.
It ain't the hanging, it's the drop.
- cowboyangel
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 10:32 pm
- cowboyangel
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 10:32 pm
- JezebelinHell
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 3:29 am
- Location: Reno
- cowboyangel
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 10:32 pm
I wouldn't be so quick to embrace the IQ measurement standard Jez. There's been alot of studies on it as not being able to quantify true intelligence and extraordinary ability. I 'd rather focus on results and achievment of individuals mentioned in this thread
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believe is false."- William Casey, CIA Director 1981
- JezebelinHell
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 3:29 am
- Location: Reno
- cowboyangel
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 10:32 pm
- JezebelinHell
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 3:29 am
- Location: Reno
-
Simply Joel
- Posts: 3483
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:08 am
- Location: Land of Lincoln
- Contact:
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
Yup. Now go over and say that on Rex's thread.cowboyangel wrote:I wouldn't be so quick to embrace the IQ measurement standard Jez. There's been alot of studies on it as not being able to quantify true intelligence and extraordinary ability. I 'd rather focus on results and achievment of individuals mentioned in this thread
- cowboyangel
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 10:32 pm
- cowboyangel
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 10:32 pm
-
Simply Joel
- Posts: 3483
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:08 am
- Location: Land of Lincoln
- Contact:
- cowboyangel
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 10:32 pm
-
Simply Joel
- Posts: 3483
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:08 am
- Location: Land of Lincoln
- Contact:
From some of the responses, I'd say maybe there are different values accorded to the terms, and definition is in order.
Do some think it "better" to be brilliant than genius.
Is not brilliant occaionally so, genius inherently/always so?
Main Entry: 1bril·liant
Pronunciation: 'bril-y&nt
Function: adjective
Etymology: French brillant, present participle of briller to shine, from Italian brillare
1 : very bright : GLITTERING <a brilliant light>
2 a : STRIKING, DISTINCTIVE <a brilliant example> b : distinguished by unusual mental keenness or alertness
synonym see BRIGHT
Main Entry: ge·nius
Pronunciation: 'jEn-y&s, 'jE-nE-&s
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural ge·nius·es or ge·nii /-nE-"I/
Etymology: Latin, tutelary spirit, natural inclinations, from gignere to beget
1 a plural genii : an attendant spirit of a person or place b plural usually genii : a person who influences another for good or bad
2 : a strong leaning or inclination : PENCHANT
3 a : a peculiar, distinctive, or identifying character or spirit b : the associations and traditions of a place c : a personification or embodiment especially of a quality or condition
4 plural usually genii : SPIRIT, JINNI
5 plural usually geniuses a : a single strongly marked capacity or aptitude <had a genius for getting along with boys -- Mary Ross> b : extraordinary intellectual power especially as manifested in creative activity c : a person endowed with transcendent mental superiority; especially : a person with a very high intelligence quotient
synonym see GIFT
Do some think it "better" to be brilliant than genius.
Is not brilliant occaionally so, genius inherently/always so?
Main Entry: 1bril·liant
Pronunciation: 'bril-y&nt
Function: adjective
Etymology: French brillant, present participle of briller to shine, from Italian brillare
1 : very bright : GLITTERING <a brilliant light>
2 a : STRIKING, DISTINCTIVE <a brilliant example> b : distinguished by unusual mental keenness or alertness
synonym see BRIGHT
Main Entry: ge·nius
Pronunciation: 'jEn-y&s, 'jE-nE-&s
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural ge·nius·es or ge·nii /-nE-"I/
Etymology: Latin, tutelary spirit, natural inclinations, from gignere to beget
1 a plural genii : an attendant spirit of a person or place b plural usually genii : a person who influences another for good or bad
2 : a strong leaning or inclination : PENCHANT
3 a : a peculiar, distinctive, or identifying character or spirit b : the associations and traditions of a place c : a personification or embodiment especially of a quality or condition
4 plural usually genii : SPIRIT, JINNI
5 plural usually geniuses a : a single strongly marked capacity or aptitude <had a genius for getting along with boys -- Mary Ross> b : extraordinary intellectual power especially as manifested in creative activity c : a person endowed with transcendent mental superiority; especially : a person with a very high intelligence quotient
synonym see GIFT
- cowboyangel
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 10:32 pm
- Rob the Wop
- Posts: 1814
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 4:06 pm
- Location: Furbackistan, OR
- Contact:
-
Simply Joel
- Posts: 3483
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:08 am
- Location: Land of Lincoln
- Contact:
- Lilly Flower
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 3:33 am
Oh my, I agree.Simply Joel wrote:i prefer not to make such comparisons because it might provide insight to what i value and/or don't value.
There is no such thing as a Genius. What people call a "Genius" are just indivisuals put on a pedastal by most that dont understand that who they are worshiping is just good or perhaps brilliant at what they do.
Goodness.
You are watching too much TV.
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
- Rob the Wop
- Posts: 1814
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 4:06 pm
- Location: Furbackistan, OR
- Contact:
I'd make a fair claim on my example.Rob the Wop wrote:Brilliant = Michaelangelo Buonarrata
Genius = Leonardo Da Vinci
Michaelangelo was incredibley talented, but fairly one-dimensionable. His art was incredbile, showing talents far beyond the norm.
But Leonardo was incredibley talented in many fields. Some of his engineering work wasn't even feasible until centuries later. He pioneered the field of realistic art.
But I'm kinda biased in these respects.
[b]The other, other white meat.[/b]