Gmail Invites...
Gmail Invites...
I was looking for one yesterday, and got bombarded! I have one or two I could part with... Need one?
1gb of free storage (yes 1 GIG), it organizes your emails into conversations (berry cool), and you have a search bar just like google that goes through your email... no more searching for old emails.
I've had mine one day, and i love it.
Once you sign up random people get more invites, maybe you could post em here... I'm sure more than 2 of you could use an account.
*just a thought*
Brooke
1gb of free storage (yes 1 GIG), it organizes your emails into conversations (berry cool), and you have a search bar just like google that goes through your email... no more searching for old emails.
I've had mine one day, and i love it.
Once you sign up random people get more invites, maybe you could post em here... I'm sure more than 2 of you could use an account.
*just a thought*
Brooke
=(*o*)=(^-^)=(º0º)=(*.*)=(^_^)=(*_*)=
- midgetsonparade
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 2:13 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca
- Contact:
- Lydia Love
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 8:01 pm
- Location: Seattle
- buckethead alien
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 8:07 am
- Burning Since: 1997
- Location: Wrong Island
LL et. al., I have at my disposal unlimited POP e-mail accounts with 50MB limits that I am willing to give to good homes. They are on my @burningsquid.com account, which is all paid up, and it only seems fair to share. PM me if you want to talk about getting one. No strings attached. No data mining, etc... These are not webmail accounts, so you'll need to have an ISP that will allow you to use outside domain names.Lydia Love wrote:hey! I wouldn't mind being hooked up!
I'm with RebA on the creepy factor at gmail. Fight the powah.
Buckethead, Buckethead you are like an Alien
Buckethead, Buckethead your head is like a dish
Buckethead, Buckethead sometimes you wear the Maybelline
Buckethead, Buckethead sometimes you're full of fish
Buckethead, Buckethead your head is like a dish
Buckethead, Buckethead sometimes you wear the Maybelline
Buckethead, Buckethead sometimes you're full of fish
- buckethead alien
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 8:07 am
- Burning Since: 1997
- Location: Wrong Island
http://news.com.com/Scammers+use+Gmail+ ... 67986.htmlRebA! wrote:http://gmail-is-too-creepy.com/
Scammers use Gmail invite as phishing hook
Published: September 15, 2004, 9:41 AM PDT
By Jo Best
Special to CNET News.com
Scammers have caught on to the allure of Gmail and are using the Google e-mail service for a "phishing" scam to harvest e-mail addresses and passwords.
For the fashion-conscious techie, a Gmail account seems to be a must-have status symbol. The free service, which is not yet widely available, has even provoked people to try to sell their Gmail addresses on eBay.
Phishing schemes commonly involve e-mail requests for information that seem to be from trusted sources such as eBay or Citibank. In this case, the scammers send the phishing e-mail to existing holders of Gmail accounts, offering them the opportunity to invite three or six of their friends to join Gmail. The body of the e-mail reads "I found this e-mail very weird." .....
Buckethead, Buckethead you are like an Alien
Buckethead, Buckethead your head is like a dish
Buckethead, Buckethead sometimes you wear the Maybelline
Buckethead, Buckethead sometimes you're full of fish
Buckethead, Buckethead your head is like a dish
Buckethead, Buckethead sometimes you wear the Maybelline
Buckethead, Buckethead sometimes you're full of fish
- theCryptofishist
- Posts: 40312
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Burning Since: 2017
- Location: In Exile
I also have 6 available. I think they are making a new push to get the accounts out there. I had to wait for a long time before I was given any invites, now some of the people that I gave invites to suddenly have invites to give away themselves.dman wrote:Hmm, I thought everyone who wanted one already had one; a quick check says I have 6 available, first come first served.
Icepack
[email protected]
[email protected]
- aforceforgood
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 8:49 pm
- Markov Chaney
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 10:30 pm
- Location: Somewhere on the high seas
- DangerMouse
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:27 am
- Burning Since: 2004
- Camp Name: Bacon Lube - The 8th Food Group
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Markov Chaney
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 10:30 pm
- Location: Somewhere on the high seas
- emily sparkle
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 4:50 am
- Location: the happy valley, ma
i have several too
PM me if you would like one from me.
:) emily sparkle
eplaya administrator
___
mobilize, energize, motivate, INSPIRE ordinary people to do things to improve their quality of life.
- nobel peace prize winner, wangari maathai
eplaya administrator
___
mobilize, energize, motivate, INSPIRE ordinary people to do things to improve their quality of life.
- nobel peace prize winner, wangari maathai
I think we will all eventually sacrifice our desire for privacy as we see that it brings less value to our lives than the speed and convenience with which we can do things, if we are willing to give up some privacy.
I studied privacy law, such as it is, in law school, and it's not a topic I take lightly. But think: what is it that we most want privacy for? We want privacy to protect stigmatized behavior. If our culture changes so that fewer behaviors are stigmatized, we will need less privacy.
(I'm not talking about governmental privacy issues here, only corporate, such as the situation with google.)
I am happy to be able to do things more quickly and more efficiently using gmail, and I don't care if they scan my emails for adwords, because I don't believe google is in league with the feds or any other law-enforcement agency, and I don't think google data could be acquired by LE agents without a search warrant.
We shouldn't resist data collection, or any other technological change, just because some aspect of it could be used for nefarious purposes. Instead, we should develop the technology but figure out how to contain the bad parts. Otherwise we are never going to get anywhere toward improving the pathetic state of affairs we find ourselves in today on this planet.
Having said all that, I still can't get to my fucking mail because gmail has been down for over a day now.
I studied privacy law, such as it is, in law school, and it's not a topic I take lightly. But think: what is it that we most want privacy for? We want privacy to protect stigmatized behavior. If our culture changes so that fewer behaviors are stigmatized, we will need less privacy.
(I'm not talking about governmental privacy issues here, only corporate, such as the situation with google.)
I am happy to be able to do things more quickly and more efficiently using gmail, and I don't care if they scan my emails for adwords, because I don't believe google is in league with the feds or any other law-enforcement agency, and I don't think google data could be acquired by LE agents without a search warrant.
We shouldn't resist data collection, or any other technological change, just because some aspect of it could be used for nefarious purposes. Instead, we should develop the technology but figure out how to contain the bad parts. Otherwise we are never going to get anywhere toward improving the pathetic state of affairs we find ourselves in today on this planet.
Having said all that, I still can't get to my fucking mail because gmail has been down for over a day now.
Really? Maybe you should check into that. I haven't had any trouble with Gmail at all. Did have trouble with one of my Yahoo accounts, but after about a week finally got it straightened out.zzberlin wrote:I think we will all eventually sacrifice our desire for privacy as we see that it brings less value to our lives than the speed and convenience with which we can do things, if we are willing to give up some privacy.
I studied privacy law, such as it is, in law school, and it's not a topic I take lightly. But think: what is it that we most want privacy for? We want privacy to protect stigmatized behavior. If our culture changes so that fewer behaviors are stigmatized, we will need less privacy.
(I'm not talking about governmental privacy issues here, only corporate, such as the situation with google.)
I am happy to be able to do things more quickly and more efficiently using gmail, and I don't care if they scan my emails for adwords, because I don't believe google is in league with the feds or any other law-enforcement agency, and I don't think google data could be acquired by LE agents without a search warrant.
We shouldn't resist data collection, or any other technological change, just because some aspect of it could be used for nefarious purposes. Instead, we should develop the technology but figure out how to contain the bad parts. Otherwise we are never going to get anywhere toward improving the pathetic state of affairs we find ourselves in today on this planet.
Having said all that, I still can't get to my fucking mail because gmail has been down for over a day now.
Icepack
[email protected]
[email protected]
- aforceforgood
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 8:49 pm
Thanks!
Yeah. max attachment size is 10mb, 9 or so plus encoding really, so I guess some stuff I'll still have to split up, there's a very cool splitter called hjsplit that is free, hjsplit.com or email me and I'll send you a copy, it's only 216kb and is so stupid-simple that your grandma could use it if only she weren't afraid that clicking the wrong thing might make the computer explode.
As for the privacy thing, since your email (and everything else on the net) has never been all that secure anyway, I'll take the more efficient and larger sized tool and just continue on with the assumption that everything I write/read on the net is an open book.
I mean really, the internet was developed by the military, do you really believe they don't monitor everything as a matter of course?
This incredible tool, a cornucopia of information, applicable to national defense, buying patterns, financial markets, etc.,etc.,etc., and they just gave it away to the public and never looked at it again?
uh, right.
Oh, you did? I'm sorry then, I didn't mean to wake you from your dream, yes, everything's ok, go back to sleep...
Yeah. max attachment size is 10mb, 9 or so plus encoding really, so I guess some stuff I'll still have to split up, there's a very cool splitter called hjsplit that is free, hjsplit.com or email me and I'll send you a copy, it's only 216kb and is so stupid-simple that your grandma could use it if only she weren't afraid that clicking the wrong thing might make the computer explode.
As for the privacy thing, since your email (and everything else on the net) has never been all that secure anyway, I'll take the more efficient and larger sized tool and just continue on with the assumption that everything I write/read on the net is an open book.
I mean really, the internet was developed by the military, do you really believe they don't monitor everything as a matter of course?
This incredible tool, a cornucopia of information, applicable to national defense, buying patterns, financial markets, etc.,etc.,etc., and they just gave it away to the public and never looked at it again?
uh, right.
Oh, you did? I'm sorry then, I didn't mean to wake you from your dream, yes, everything's ok, go back to sleep...
Be the dime you seek.
Ah. glad to have helped. I usually use Mozilla Firebird (similar to Netscape I guess). I have occasionally found that changing browsers does help with email.zzberlin wrote:Turns out it's a browser issue. I have no problems connecting to gmail using Safari, but using Netscape 7.1 on OSX will not connect.
And that's all the thought I'm going to give it for now.
Thanks again IceP!!!!
Once at work I was trying to send an email with an attachment with Netscape, and it was taking a long, long time (like 20 minutes or more). I kept retrying it and retrying it. Finally I booted up Explorer and the thing went through in seconds like it was supposed to. No idea why, but was glad to finally get the work done and get out of there.
Sounds like you are running a Mac. I may be headed down that road soon myself at work. Good to know that Safari works better than Netscape. Thank you for the headsup on that one.
Icepack
[email protected]
[email protected]
- aforceforgood
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 8:49 pm
-
talking_sausage
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:08 pm
- Location: Santa Barbara
privacy . data mining
I fling my wooden shoes into any machine that searches my emails by randomly including suspicious words in all my emails and postings
small pox martyr strontium 90
If a carnivore program has a full belly
meth lab fissile mass
It won't be out hunting
aerial dispersal
I suggest you do the same
pez made of cocaine
small pox martyr strontium 90
If a carnivore program has a full belly
meth lab fissile mass
It won't be out hunting
aerial dispersal
I suggest you do the same
pez made of cocaine