I just read an article about someone's wifi/satellite phone booth at the event... http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/0 ... =193&tid=1
Unfortunately the poster couldn't just mention the project in question, they had to bring up the fact that there are photos of naked people... doing their part to give Burning Man a reputation it doesn't deserve and potentially attracting the type of undesirables often discussed on this forum.
Way to go.
BM Tech on Slashdot
- Papa Bear
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 9:36 pm
- Burning Since: 2003
- Camp Name: Astral Headwash. Not the Placer.
- Location: Berthoud, Colorado
- Contact:
Re: BM Tech on Slashdot
With all due respect, I think you're wildly overreacting.b00m3rang wrote:
Unfortunately the poster couldn't just mention the project in question, they had to bring up the fact that there are photos of naked people... doing their part to give Burning Man a reputation it doesn't deserve and potentially attracting the type of undesirables often discussed on this forum.
The "includes non-gratuitous pictures of naked people" reference Brad Templeton included in that post was entirely appropriate -- not only did it poke fun at the people who would visit the page in the hope of seeing some skin, it also acted as a warning that the contents were potentially not "work-safe" viewing.
Burning Man has been in the public eye for years, and there are plenty of other mass-media references with much wider reach that focus on sex & drugs. Accusing Brad of attracting "undesirables" is just silly.
Papa Bear
Re: BM Tech on Slashdot
Possible, it just seems that every time I see the event in mass media, it's usually, "Look at all the naked people on drugs in the desert." It said "non gratuitous", but then said "that ought to test my server", which made it sound to me like they were just trying to drum up traffic.Papa Bear wrote:With all due respect, I think you're wildly overreacting.
Anyway, I hope you're right.
- DVD Burner
- Posts: 11031
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:09 am
- Burning Since: 1986
- Camp Name: White Trash Camp
- Contact:
- playasnake
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:32 pm
Re: BM Tech on Slashdot
Yes, thats quite a fabrication... not everyone on drugs is naked, and not everyone who is naked is on drugs...b00m3rang wrote:Possible, it just seems that every time I see the event in mass media, it's usually, "Look at all the naked people on drugs in the desert."
e pluribus unimog
Re: BM Tech on Slashdot
slashdot.org is a popular web site. A _huge_ number of people go to the sites that slashdot refers to.b00m3rang wrote:Papa Bear wrote: It said "non gratuitous", but then said "that ought to test my server", which made it sound to me like they were just trying to drum up traffic.
A _huge_ number.
This is called 'the slashdot effect,' and often causes servers to crash because of too much traffic.
As for your actual point...well, in what way does Burning Man _not_ deserve the reputation as a place where people go around naked?
Am I missing something, or isn't Burning Man about the largest clothing optional event in the country?